[Statement] The Marcos’ Legacy of Fraudulent and Illegitimate Debts -FDC
The Marcos’ Legacy of Fraudulent and Illegitimate Debts
As the nation remembers today the declaration of Martial Law and the imposition of the Marcos fascist dictatorship 40 years ago—we recall not only the crimes and abuses , but the valiant struggles of our people to end the tyrannical regime.
Today is a day of remembering, so that we will not forget this dark chapter in our nation’s history and will not allow it to happen again.
Today is a day of reckoning, as we continue to pursue justice and redress for countless victims of Martial Law abuses, including crimes and legacies that continue to hound and harm our nation and people.
One of these criminal legacies, is the regime’s fraudulent and illegitimate debts that were riddled with corruption and hardly benefited the people. In 1986, the dictator fled the country and left our economy in shambles, burdened with $28 B foreign debt, from $1B, at the start of the Marcos’ presidency. Reports have it that 33% of Marcos regime’s loans , equivalent to $8B went to Marcos and his cronies pockets. Estimates of the Marcos’ ill-gotten wealth ranged from a low $5B to as high as $30B. The plunder of our economy plunged the people into mass poverty. In 1975, 57% of the Filipino families reportedly lived below the poverty line, while Marcos, his wife and their cronies indulged in extravagance and opulence. Today, Filipino taxpayers continue to bear the cost of the regime’s foreign debts, until 2025.
Successive post-martial law governments starting from the Cory Aquino government, not only failed to deliver economic justice to the people, but honored and paid from the people’s money, the Marcos regime’s fraudulent and illegitimate debts. They continued, repackaged and even enhanced the same discredited, flawed and ill-fated economic policies and strategies of the dictatorship that deny development and dignity to the many while ensuring the benefits of the few and the powerful as well as of their foreign partners and backers.
The Aquino government affirmed the Marcos practice of automatic appropriations for debt servicing, at the expense of the health, education and basic social services that the government is duty-bound to provide for the people. This policy contributed to a perennial and seemingly vicious cycle of budget shortfalls and fiscal crises, continued debt and interest payments, increased tax burdens, increased debt burdens and severe reduction , if not criminal neglect of the welfare needs, economic and social services for the people.
The Aquino regime and successive governments, often used the budget and the debt crisis they inherited from Marcos as reasons to allow the imposition of neoliberal policies by the multinational and international financial institutions such as the IMF-World Bank and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in exchange for more loans and other measures to ride out of their fiscal problems. They embarked for instance on privatization and deregulation of essential public services like water and power, the cheap sale of government assets and properties and the imposition of regressive tax measures such as the 10% Value-Added Tax (VAT) which was later increased and expanded to the detriment of the majority poor consumers. In 1992, when the Aquino presidency ended, the country’s total foreign debt increased by $2B more, to $30B. Under Aquino’s term, the economy was weighed down by 17% inflation rate, 10% unemployment and 65% of Filipinos who considered themselves poor.
The governments’ stubborn policy of debt repayments and their inability to spend and invest have consigned our country not only to debt burden and debt trap, but also economic stagnation, relative to its ASEAN neighbors. Between 1990-2005 for instance, the Philippines’ average annual GDP growth rate was the lowest in the region, according to former FDC President Walden Belo. Between 1986-1991 the country reportedly averaged a negative $1.5 B transfer of resources to the creditor countries each year.
New loans were also being contracted by post-EDSA governments increasingly from financial markets. These new dimensions of indebtedness, render our economy more vulnerable to the complexities and vagaries of the global financial system.
Today, under the Noynoy Aquino government, with its “Matuwid Na Daan and Inclusive Growth” policies, the country’s foreign debt stands at a whopping $62.4 B. In its 2013 budget, the P-noy government has earmarked at least P333.9 billion in interest payments alone, for the government’s debt.
The continuing failure of the Pnoy government to prioritize the people’s needs and welfare over debt servicing, is not only a failure to rectify the Marcos misdeeds. It is also a continuing economic injustice to the Filipino people perpetrated by the subsequent post-Martial law regimes to this day. Every hard-earned peso of every Filipino taxpayer paid to service the country’s debt, means every peso of unfulfilled obligation of the government to its citizens and people .This social debt to the people by successive governments must be repaid! In 2008, FDC reported that each Filipino, from the new-born to the dying owed P43,487 in public debt and is forced to pay P7,012 annually to service the debt. The Philippine government is spending P1.1 million per minute of the people’s money for debt servicing.
Today, under Pnoy’s term at least 23.1 million Filipinos consider themselves poor, with the bottom 30% of our people subsisting on a meager P173/day.
Today, as Martial Law victims and survivors continue to demand justice and compensation for their sufferings, we at the Freedom from Debt Coalition (FDC) join hands in calling for economic justice and freedom from debt bondage and burden for the Filipino people. No to automatic debt servicing at the expense of people’s rights and welfare! Yes to repayment of social debt to the people!
Freedom from Debt Coalition (FDC)
September 21, 2012
All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.
Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.