Category Archives: Finalists for 3rd HR Pinduteros Choice for HR BLOG POST

[Blog] THE SABAH ISSUE: The Betrayal to the Republic of the Philippines of Mr. Aquino by Jose Mario De Vega

THE SABAH ISSUE: The Betrayal to the Republic of the Philippines of Mr. Aquino

Mario De VegaI concur with the statement of the Anonymous Philippines (February 28th) that President Aquino‘s February 26, 2013 statement on Sabah issue is problematic.

In fact, I will even argue that the pronouncement of Mr. Aquino is unpatriotic and treasonous. Whatever little respect I have in him is completely gone the very moment I heard him uttered those traitorous words!


Where can you find a president whose allegiance is not with his people but with another state?

I also agree with candidate Dick Gordon that Mr. Aquino is courting an impeachment case against him for not “executing faithfully the laws of the land”. In failing to do so, he is betraying the “public trust and the public and patrimonial interest of the nation.

It is beyond dispute that “the context of this action by the Sultan of Sulu and his followers is beyond question. It is not a power-grab. Neither is it a land-grab. It is a reassertion of their historic, legal and moral right to be in Sabah, the vast track of land in Northern Borneo controlled by the Federation of Malaysia. It was for them the pursuit of a noble cause.”

Anyone can check all the available sources that they can find, whether it is an encyclopedia, atlas, almanac, Wikipedia, history books, etc. In all of them, Sabah can never ever be separated with the Philippines, specifically the Sultanate of Sulu.

Consider the words of Mr. Aquino:

“You are a leader of your clan, and every leader seeks the well-being of his constituents. These times require you to use your influence to prevail on our countrymen to desist from this hopeless cause.”

I wonder who the hell is his adviser on Sabah? Whoever the hell is that creature, he/she should be immediately shot on the spot. I also wonder why it is that this so-called President appears to be ignorant and blur on the whole issue?

Are those words quoted above, the words you want to hear from your so-called Chief Executive?


Following the line of his ‘reasoning’, if one can imagine or construe, what kind of ‘argument’ is that: why is he egging our people to stand up and fight and not be intimidated by giant and bullish China? Yet, when it comes to the Malaysians, he seems to be soft and apathetic?

This is a clear contradiction!

If the question of the ownership of Sabah is a hopeless cause then, how about our cause against China? Is that not a hopeless case, too? Again, that is following Mr. Aquino’s ‘mental mechanism’.

If our cause against China is not hopeless, then how come our cause against Malaysia is dormant?

The aberrant position of Mr. Aquino defies logic and mock reason!

Further, I would like to ask: what is the distinction in our Sabah dispute with regard to our conflict with China? Why in the latter, he is so eager to stand up with the giant (to the point that a newspaper in China and even here went to the point of tagging and calling him/us as a “trouble maker”) yet he is so cautious and soft with regard to the former?

I see no distinction by virtue of the fact that Sabah and
Scarborough Shoal, etc are both our properties and territories.
Why he is not afraid to irritate China, yet he appears to be uneasy to offend Malaysia?

Indeed, there is no shadow of doubt that “it must have been a totally disappointing and devastating feeling for Sultan Kiram and his followers to hear that their noble cause is, for the President of the Philippines, “a hopeless cause.””

Sad but true!

It is my considered view that Mr. Aquino’s call to the followers of Sultan Kiram: “To desist from this hopeless cause” is not merely an impeachable offense but undeniably treasonous and the heights of unpatriotism!

I am ashamed that he is the president of this country.

The duty of a true and valiant president is to be the first one to recognize the claim of the Sultanate of Sulu that “Malaysia has no ownership rights over Sabah and that such ownership rights belong to the Sultanate of Sulu over Sabah which is rightfully within Philippine territory. The position of the Sultanate of Sulu is, in fact and in law, exactly the international claim of the Philippines on Sabah against Malaysia.”

This argument is in conformity with Ambassador Lauro L. Baja, Jr. (A veteran Philippine diplomat. He was the Philippine Permament Representative to the United Nations (May 2003- Feb.2007). Prior to that, he was Foreign Affairs Undersecretary for Policy) in his article ‘Don’t play into Malaysia’s hand’, VERA Files, February 27th, when we categorically state that:

Mr. Aquino’s “statements and actions give the unintended consequence of leaning on our own nationals over a foreign power. We may be playing into Malaysia’s hands who have been adopting a studied but cavalier attitude over the standoff. They are exercising acts of “effectivités” over Sabah during this standoff by their actions and even by their silence over our naive pronouncements.”

The “wisdom of doing it in public” (the President’s act of appearing on TV appealing and at the same time chastising and criticizing the Sultan of Sulu over the stand-off in Sabah) has clearly shows that he has no concern with our Sabah claim and that instead of taking the cudgel of our Filipino Muslim brothers, he let them down, worst he even appears to be the Malaysian spokesperson.

The whole thing exploded to his very face!

I strongly doubt if he could still recover the trust and confidence of the people and the public as a whole!

The reaction of the people is swift. Check the Yahoo online survey.

The latest is that Mr. Aquino is viewed by a greater number of our countrymen as pro-Malaysia. What a shame!

The so-called ‘president’ of daang matuwid became the pang-gulo ng kalsadang baluktot!

As Ambassador Baja said:

“The Sabah standoff should rouse the Philippine Rip van Winkle attitude towards our claim to the area. It provides the country with a unique but sensitive opportunity to revisit our claim. If the Philippines can deal with the situation with some diplomatic imagination and finesse it can correct some missteps of the past which led to the current state of helplessness insofar as the issue is concerned…

“The solid legal foundation of our claim still exists.

“In the transfer of sovereignty document which the Sultan of Sulu signed with the Philippine government, it was expressly provided that the transfer shall be deemed voided if the Philippines shall fail to pursue the claim. The sultan understandably feels he is now free to pursue the claim himself.”

Why? Because this President does not give a damn about them, hence I concur that the Sultan had no choice but to pursue their historic claim by themselves.

Indeed, “it is a sad commentary on the Philippines if our own nationals should run to the UN because their government cannot protect their rights. This is not the spectacle our country wants to portray to the international community.”

Professor Randy David is in point where he stated in his article, “The Real Sovereign”, Philippine Daily Inquirer, March 7th that:

The Sultan can very well file his private claims before a Malaysian or international court; he does not need the Philippine government’s consent to do this. Since the Philippine government has not actively pursued its sovereign claim over Sabah, the Sultan is free to seek help elsewhere.

One thing he cannot do is force the Philippine state to go to war for him.


My suggestion is for the United Nations to intervene on this issue and assume jurisdiction.

I welcome their call this Thursday (finally, after weeks of silence) for the parties to stop from killing and wiping out each other.

I also call upon the Organization of Islamic State (OIC) to mediate between the followers of the Sultan of Sulu and Malaysia to engage in a dialogue.

Further, I certainly believe that the intervention of the Sultan of Brunei, as the original historical owner carries some moral and persuasive effect to the contending parties.

The Sabah “invasion”

How could be the act of the followers of the Sultan of Sulu be considered as an “intrusion” or invasion” when said land subject of the dispute is their land?

If Malaysia owned the land, as they are claiming then why the hell up to now they are paying rent, no matter how nominal and small the amount to the Sultan of Sulu?

The use of excessive force

I concur overwhelmingly with Professor Harry L. Roque, Director, Institute of International Legal Studies of the University of the Philippines Law Center that:

“The use of modern fighter jets and air strikes against the followers of the Sultanate of Sulu is illegal. Under human rights law, the use of force in police operations should be absolutely necessary and strictly proportional to the threat posed by the Filipinos in Sabah. Moreover, Respect for the right to life of a police suspect requires that the nature and degree of force used be proportionate to the threat posed by the suspect to the safety and security of the police officers, other individuals and society as a whole. Malaysian Law enforcement officials should, as far as possible, apply non-violent means before resorting to force, and in particular, the resort to airstrikes.

“Since the use of force against the Filipinos involved in the standoff is illegal, Malaysia has committed an internationally wrongful act. Accordingly, the Philippine government, in addition to espousing the rights of its nationals, should also demand that the international community should ask Malaysia to cease and desist from further breaching human rights law. It should later be asked to pay compensation to the victims of its use of disproportionate use of force.”

According to the Malaysian authorities, they have already defeated the ‘militants’, yet even their senior police officer is doubting that that is the case. Further, the so-called “mopping operations” have yet to produce the dead bodies of the “intruders”. Hence, what ‘victory’ is this?

The barbarity of war

I condemn Malaysia for using excessive force, in the same vein that I also condemn to the highest degree the acts of the followers of the Sultan of Sulu (if the reports are true) that they engaged in torturing and beheading the police and/or soldiers that they caught!

This is a shame!

Both sides are wrong on this score!

Yes, there is an on-going conflict, but as the American philosopher William James said, there should be a certain degree of morality, even in war.

Why? Because if both sides will engaged in acts of barbarism, then there would be no distinction between the two and the two of them would be no different from animals and scoundrels.

The Cyberwar

It saddens me that the on-going stand-off in Sabah has already spilled to the cyber world!

According to the reports, Malaysian hackers hacked the site of Globe; thereupon in an immediate retaliation, the Anonymous Philippines Cyber Army also hit back and hacked numerous Malaysian sites!

This pierces my heart profusely!

On this juncture, I would like to thank and commend the Anonymous International in their intervention and call for both the Filipino and Malaysian hackers to stop this unnecessary cyberwar.

As they said in an official statement:

“Let us help both The Philippines and Malaysia unite, not find a reason to fight…”

We all have to find a way to stop this fiasco before, a more bigger and much sinister development happen!

According further to the reports, the ‘war-front’ that begun as a single area has now spread to other areas. Now, the front-lines of battle are on three different locations.

So, now how will the Malaysian authorities conduct the so-called mopping operation, if the delineation of the battle-fields is not clear?

I do not know whether the Malaysian authorities are aware of the consequences of its actions!

They claimed that the so-called ‘militants’ and/or ‘intruders’ are numbering from 100 to 300; then why not send 1, 000 to 2, 000 marines or soldiers to subdue them? Why bring in the tanks and the fighter jets?

Are they afraid to fight in a mortal combat those so-called ‘invaders’?

It was also reported that one Malaysian fighter jet instead of hitting the position of the ‘militants’ rather wrongly bomb their own soldiers. Is this a case of a ‘friendly-fire’ or due to some human error or can we attribute this to the stupidity of the pilot?

Yes, they can wipe out and kill all of those ‘intruders’, yet I doubt if that would be the end of the problem!

Do they not know that the sons and daughters and the heirs of those ‘militants’, ‘invaders’, ‘intruders’ will not cease from continuing what their ancestors have struggled for!

The heirs of those ‘martyrs’ will not stop from fighting what they believe righteously belongs to them…

The ‘war’ will not end and this is because of the fault both of the governments of Malaysia and the Philippines…


Jose Mario Dolor De Vega
March 8, 2013

College of Arts and Letters
Department of Humanities and Philosophy
Polytechnic University of the Philippines

Institute of Arts and Sciences
Department of Humanities, Literature and Philosophy
Far Eastern University

The writer has a Master’s degree in Philosophy, a law degree and a degree in AB Political Science. He was previously teaching Philosophy, Ethics and Anthropology at an institution of higher education in Nilai University College at Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

As of the moment, he is preparing to publish his first book entitled “Dissidente”. It is a collection of his articles, commentaries and op-ed published by various newspapers in Southeast Asia, including the Philippine Daily Inquirer

Iboto ang iyong #HRPinduterosChoice para sa HR BLOGGERS POST.

Ang botohan ay magsisimula ngayon hanggang sa 11:59 ng Nov 15, 2013.

Ikaw para kanino ka pipindot? Simple lang bumoto:
• i-LIKE ang thumbnail/s ng iyong mga ibinoboto sa HRonlinePH facebook, i-share at
• Bisitahin ang post sa (links sa bawat thumbnail) at pindutin ang button sa
poll sa ilalim ng bawat nominadong post.
• Most number of the combined likes sa FB at sa poll buttons ang magiging 3rd HR Pinduteros
Choice na kikilalanin sa 2013 HR week celebration.

Makiisa sa pagpapalaganap ng impormasyon hinggil sa karapatang pantao. Pindot na!


All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Tula] Patula ng Pandaigdigang Pahayag ng Karapatang Pantao ni Greg Bituin

ni Gregorio V. Bituin Jr.

UDHR Patula


Sa ikasampu ng Disyembre ng taon
Labingsiyam, apatnapu’t walo noon

Nang yaong pangkalahatang asambliya
Ng Nagkakaisang Bansa’y magkaisa

Nang pinagtibay nila’t ipinahayag
Ang inakdang Pandaigdigang Pahayag

Ng Karapatang Pantao sa daigdig
Upang tao’y di basta-basta malupig.

Kasunod ng makasaysayang pahayag
Sa mga kasaping bansa’y tumatawag

Na ilathala ang nilalaman nito
At mapabasa sa mas maraming tao

Makita, maipaliwanag din naman
Sa eskwelahan at iba pang aralan

Nang walang distingsyon batay sa estado
Pulitikal ng bansa o teritoryo.

Mga kababayan, halina’t tunghayan
Ang pagkakasalin ko’t ang panulaan

Hinggil sa Pandaigdigang Karapatan
Ng bawat tao sa alinmang lipunan.


Yayamang pagkilala sa karangalan
Pantay, di maikait na karapatan

Ng lahat ng pamilya ng tao’t bayan
Ang siyang saligan nitong kalayaan

Sa pagkamit ng lahat ng katarungan
At sa kaganapan sa sandaigdigan.

Yayamang yaong pagwawalang-bahala
Pag-aalipusta’t pagbabalewala

Sa karapatang pantao’y nagbunga man
Ng gawang malupit na lumapastangan

Sa budhi ng bayan at sangkatauhan
At ang pagtatamasa ng kalayaan

Sa pagpahayag at paniwala nila
At kalayaan din mula sa pangamba

At pagnanasa ay ipinahayag na
Bilang matayog na hangarin ng masa.

Yayamang kung wala nang pagpipilian
At kailangan bilang huling takbuhan

Ang maghimagsik laban sa pang-aapi
Kaysa naman magsisi sa bandang huli

Upang tuluyan nang maipagsanggalang
Ang ating angking pantaong karapatan.

Yayamang dapat at kinakailangang
Itaguyod ang pagsulong ng ugnayang

Pakikipagkaibigan sa pagitan
Ng iba’t ibang bansa’t ng mamamayan.

Yayamang mamamayan ng bawat bansa
Ay nagkasundo’t may pagsampalataya

Sa pangunahing karapatang pantao
Sa dangal at halaga ng bawat tao

At sa pagkakapantay ng karapatan
Ng kalalakihan at kababaihan

Nagpasyang itaguyod ang panlipunang
Pag-unlad at mas magandang pamantayan

Ng buhay sa mundong sadyang mas malaya
Sa lahat ng tao sa lahat ng bansa.

Mga kasaping Estado’y namanata
Na tutulong sa Nagkakaisang Bansa

Itaguyod ang daigdigang paggalang,
Karapatan, at batayang kalayaan.

Yayamang itong pagkakaunawaan
Ng lahat ng karapatan, kalayaan

Ay may napakalaking kahalagahan
Upang panata’y maisakatuparan

At itong Pangkalahatang Kapulungan
Ay nagpapahayag ng Pandaigdigang

Pahayag nitong Pantaong Karapatan
Bilang isa nang ganap na pamantayan

Ng lahat na ng kahanga-hangang bagay
Para sa tao’t bayang nagkakaugnay

Na sa huli, ang bawat tao’t lipunan
Na pinananatili sa kaisipan

Ang Pahayag na ito ay magsumikap
Sa pagtuturo’t pag-aaral ng ganap

Upang itaguyod itong karapatan
Pati kalayaan sa pamamagitan

Ng maunlad na hakbang, sa pambansa man
Maging ito rin nama’y pandaigdigan

At kilalanin ng kasaping Estado
At ng tao sa kanilang teritoryo

Itong lahat ng karapatang pantao
Na dapat tamasahin ng buong mundo.


Lahat ng tao’y malayang isinilang
Na may pantay na dangal at karapatan

Pinagkalooban ng budhi’t katwiran
Nang makitungo sa diwang kapatiran


Lahat ng angkop sa Pahayag na ito
Ng walang kaibhan sa anumang tipo

Lahi, kasarian, relihiyon, wika
Kulay ng balat o ibang pang-unawa

Pambansa o panlipunang pinagmulan
Pag-aari o anumang kalagayan

Walang pagkakaibang dapat malikha
Sa pulitikal, kalagayan ng bansa

O sa kinabibilangang teritoryo
O ng anumang pagtatakda ng tao.


Ang lahat ng tao ay may karapatan
Sa buhay, kalayaan at kaligtasan.


Walang sinumang dapat ipailalim
Sa pambubusabos at pang-aalipin

Ang pang-aalipin at pangangalakal
Ng alipin ay dapat nang ipagbawal

Sa lahat ng anupamang anyo nito
Pagkat sila’y mga kapwa natin tao


Sinuma’y di dapat dumanas ng hirap
O ng kalupitang di katanggap-tanggap

O ng anupamang mapang-aping trato
At pagpaparusang hindi makatao.


Sa harap ng batas ay dapat kilanlin
Lahat bilang taos aanman nanggaling.


Ang lahat ay pantay sa harap ng batas
Merong karapatan at lahat ay patas

Ng walang anupamang diskriminasyon
At sa batas ay may pantay na proteksyon.


Karapat-dapat na pambansang hukuman
Ay dapat tumulong sa pangkabuuan

Sa batayang karapatang ibinigay
Ng konstitusyon o ng batas na taglay

Laban sa mga kilos na lumalabag
Sa mga karapatang di dapat hungkag


Di dapat pailalim ang sinupaman
Sa mga pagdakip na di makatwiran

At sa pagkakulong o pagkakapiit
Na sa makaranas ay sadyang masakit.


Ang lahat ay may karapatang madinig
Ang kanyang sasabihin at kanyang panig

At matalakay anumang kanyang tindig
Sa isang patas at hayagang pagdinig

Nitong isang independyenteng hukuman
Na tinitingnang walang kinikilingan

Sa pagpapasya sa mga karapatan
At tungkuling sa balikat pinapasan

Ng taumbayan o kaya’y ng sinumang
May kasong kriminal na sa kanya’y laban.


Dapat ituring na walang kasalanan
Ang maysala umano at kinasuhan

Hanggang ang sala niya’y mapatunayan
Sa batas at paglilitis na hayagan

Kung saan ang kailangang garantiya
Ay nasa kanya na para sa depensa.

Walang sinuman yaong may kasalanan
Sa pagkakasalang mapaparusahan

Kung ang pagkakasala nila’y nagawa
Noong ang batas para doon ay wala

O ipatupad parusang mas matindi
Kaysa nang magawa ang salang nasabi.


Di dapat ipailalim ang sinuman
Sa hindi makatwirang pakikialam

Sa kanyang pribadong buhay, sa tahanan
Sa pamilya, sa pakikipaglihaman

Maging sa pagbatikos sa karangalan
Lalo na sa iniingatang pangalan.

Sa proteksyon ng batas, may karapatan
Lahat laban sa mga pakikialam.


Ang sinumang tao ay may karapatan
Anumang bansa ang kinaroroonan

Sa malayang pagkilos at pananahan
Sa loob ng hangganan ng bawat bayan.

Maging sa paglisan sa anumang bansa
Umalis, bumalik sa sariling bansa.


Ang lahat din naman ay may karapatan
Maghanap, magtamasa sa ibang bayan

At sa iba pang bahagi ng daigdig
Na magpaampon mula sa pag-uusig.

Ngunit di maipapakiusap ito
Kung ang pag-uusig ay hinggil sa kaso

Ng mga krimeng di-pulitikal mula
O sa mga gawaing salungat kaya

Sa marangal na simulaing dakila
At hangarin ng Nagkakaisang Bansa.


Ang nasyonalidad din ay karapatan
Ng sinumang tao sa lahat ng bayan

At walang sinumang di makatarungang
Kanyang nasyonalidad ay tatanggalan

O kaya’y pagkaitan ng karapatang
Nasyonalidad niya’y kanyang palitan.


Lalaki’t babaeng may sapat na gulang
Ang kaibhan man nila’y di dapat hadlang

Ay may karapatang makapag-asawa
At magkaroon ng sariling pamilya

Naaangkop sa pantay na karapatan
Ang kanilang mga pag-aasawahan

Habang sila’y may relasyong mag-asawa
O kaya’y hanggang paghihiwalay nila.

Dapat lang pasukin ang pag-aasawa
Kung may malaya’t ganap na pagpapasya

At pagsang-ayon ng mapapangasawa
Sa pagsasama’t pagbuo ng pamilya.

Likas at batayang pangkat ng lipunan
Ang pamilya kaya dapat protektahan.


May karapatang mag-ari ang sinuman
Para sa sarili’t kasama’y iba man.

Walang sinuman ang di-makatarungang
Aalisan ng kanyang ari-arian.


May karapatan lahat sa kalayaang
Mag-isip, sa budhi, o relihiyon man

Kahit sa pagpapalit ng relihiyon
O anumang paniwala niya’t layon

Kalayaang ito’y maging sarili lang
Maging pampubliko o pampribado man

Relihiyon ay malayang ipahayag
Sa turo, buhay, pagsamba’t pagdiriwang.


Malayang pananaw at pagpapahayag
Ay karapatan ng bawat mamamayan

Kasama anumang pananaw na tangan
Ng walang sinuman ang nakikialam

Maghanap, tumanggap at magbahagi man
Ng mga impormasyon at kaisipan

Sa anumang media, at wala rin namang
Mga hangganang isasaalang-alang.


May karapatan lahat sa kalayaan
Sa mapayapang asambliya’t samahan

Di nararapat pilitin ang sinuman
Na maging kasapi ng isang samahan.


May karapatan lahat maging bahagi
Sa pamahalaan, direkta ma’t hindi

Sa kaparaanang malayang pagpili
Ng kinatawan, anupaman ang lahi.

Lahat sa kanyang bansa’y may karapatan
Pampublikong serbisyo’y pantay na kamtan

Kalooban ng tao’y dapat batayan
Ng kapangyarihan ng pamahalaan

Na dapat maipahayag ng tuluyan
Sa pana-panahon, tunay na halalan

Na sa pamamagitan ng daigdigan
Pantay na karapatang maghalal naman

Sa kaparaanang lihim na pagboto
O sa kaparehong patakaran nito.


Dapat na may seguridad panlipunan
Na naaangkop na isakatuparan

Sa pamamagitan ng pag-uugnayan
Pambansa man ito o pandaigdigan

Ayon sa organisasyon at rekurso
Na siyang kaya nitong bawat Estado

Karapatan mang ito’y pang-ekonomya
Maging panlipunan man o pangkultura

Na kailangan sa dangal nitong tao
At sa pag-unlad ng kanyang pagkatao.


Sa trabaho, lahat ay may karapatan
Sa pagpili ng kanyang tatrabahuhan

Makatarungan, maiging kalagayan
Proteksyon kung sa trabaho’y may kawalan

Mga nagtatrabaho’y may karapatan
Sa makatarungan nilang kabayaran

Pantay na sweldo sa pantay na trabaho
At trabahong pantay sa dangal ng tao

Karapatan nilang magbuo ng unyon
Para ang interes nila’y may proteksyon.


Dapat may pahinga’t oras na malaya
Makatwirang takda ng oras-paggawa

May karapatan din na pana-panahon
Ay magkaroon ng bayád na bakasyon.


May karapatan sa isang pamantayan
Ng pamumuhay na sagot sa sinuman

Para sa kalusugan at kagalingan
Ng isang tao’t ng kanyang pamilya man

Kasama ang pagkain at pananamit
Paninirahan at di pagkakasakit

Kasama rin ang panlipunang serbisyo
Seguridad sa nawalan ng trabaho

Nagkasakit, nabalo’t may kapansanan
Pagtanda’t nagkulang sa pangkabuhayan

Pagkat ito’y pawang mga kalagayang
Di nila hawak, di nila mapigilan.

Karapatan ng mga ina at bata
Ang di-pangkaraniwang pangangalaga

Lahat ng bata’y dapat nang matamasa
Nararapat na proteksyon sa kanila

Mga batang iyon man ay iniluwal
Sa loob at maging sa labas ng kasal.


Edukasyon ay karapatan ng lahat
At nararapat na ito’y walang bayad

Kahit man lang ito’y sa elementarya
At maging sa pangunahing antas nila

Elementarya’y dapat kunin ng lahat
Ito’y edukasyong dapat prayoridad

Edukasyong teknikal at propesyunal
Ay dapat kunin ng mga nag-aaral

Maging ng sinuman sa pangkalahatan
Edukasyo’y dapat pantay na makamtan

Ang edukasyon ay dapat umaakay
Sa ganap na pag-unlad ng pagkamalay

At sa pagpapatibay din ng paggalang
Sa karapata’t batayang kalayaan.

Itaguyod ang pagkakaunawaan
Pagpapaubaya, pagkakaibigan

Anupaman ang kanilang pinagmulan
Upang manatili ang kapayapaan.

Ang magulang ang may karapatang una
Sa edukasyong nais sa anak nila.


Ang buhay pangkultura sa pamayanan
Ay malayang lahukan ng taumbayan

Mga sining ay matamasang tuluyan
Maging bahagi ng pagsulong ng agham

May proteksyon din sa kapakanang moral
Pati na sa pakinabang na materyal.

Na ibinunga’y anumang kanyang akda
Sa agham, sining o panitikang likha.


Tao’y may karapatan sa panlipunan
Maging sa pandaigdigang kaayusan

Na mga karapatan at kalayaang
Nasaad dito’y naisakatuparan.


Lahat ay may tungkulin sa pamayanan
Na pag-unlad ng tao’y may kaganapan

Anumang karapatan at kalayaan
Ay may limitasyong sumasakop naman

Nang matiyak ang kaukulang paggalang
At pagkilala sa mga karapatan.

At kalayaan ng iba hanggang kamtan
Ang nararapat na pangangailangan

Sa moral at pampublikong kaayusan
At pati pangkalahatang kagalingan.

Kung salungat sa layunin at prinsipyo
Ng Nagkakaisang Bansa ang gawa nyo

Di dapat gamitin, nasasaad dito
Na karapatan at kalayaang ito.


Walang anumang sa Pahayag na ito
Dapat magkaroon ng kaibang kuro

O pahiwatig sa anumang Estado
Pati anumang mga pangkat o tao

Ng anumang karapatang magsagawa
Ng anumang pagkilos na maggigiba

Sa karapata’t kalayaang narito
At nakaukit sa Pahayag na ito.

Iboto ang iyong #HRPinduterosChoice para sa HR BLOGGERS POST.

Ang botohan ay magsisimula ngayon hanggang sa 11:59 ng Nov 15, 2013.

Ikaw para kanino ka pipindot? Simple lang bumoto:
• i-LIKE ang thumbnail/s ng iyong mga ibinoboto sa HRonlinePH facebook, i-share at
• Bisitahin ang post sa (links sa bawat thumbnail) at pindutin ang button sa
poll sa ilalim ng bawat nominadong post.
• Most number of the combined likes sa FB at sa poll buttons ang magiging 3rd HR Pinduteros
Choice na kikilalanin sa 2013 HR week celebration.

Makiisa sa pagpapalaganap ng impormasyon hinggil sa karapatang pantao. Pindot na!


All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.