Official Statement of the ADDU- CEAP-International Conference on Mining, 26-27 January, 2012

 AWARE of the current state of the mining industry in the Philippines driven by corporate greed and the existing policy framework promoted by the administration of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and inherited by President Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III,

AWARE of the confession of the government that ‘there is no standard resource and environment valuation’ and institutional issues need to be addressed to ensure sustainability of the country’s fragile environment and natural resources’ (Philippine Development Plan 2011-2016, pp. 310, 320-322),

AWARE that harsh effects of mining on water systems, biodiversity, air, land and island ecosystems lead to environmental destructions and disasters aggravating the impacts of hydro-meteorological hazards and threatening agriculture and food security,

AWARE that the Philippines is the most vulnerable to typhoons in the world; ranked third in disaster risk and natural hazards; and sixth considered in extreme risk due to climate change,

AWARE that the mining industry’s available economic data on value added, employment, exports and revenue contributions are aggregated, thus not helpful in economic analysis; and revenue shares of national and local government amounting to only 0.91% average contribution to Gross Domestic Product,

AWARE that mining companies in collaboration with concerned government agencies have been grossly violating human rights of communities and advocates through threats, extra-judicial killings, Investment Defense Force, mining militias, fabricating ‘free, prior and informed consents (FPIC)’, dividing and exploiting indigenous peoples communities and perpetuating other acts degrading human dignity,

AWARE that small-scale miners and workers have been blamed for various environmental disasters by the Chamber of Mines in favor of large mining companies, however, further aware that the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) and other agencies failed to fulfill its mandate to provide technical and, when displaced, extend immediate sustainable economic assistance,

AWARE that the number of local government units who are standing up to oppose mining in their respective jurisdictions is increasing, however, not recognized by the national government and mining companies,

AWARE of the aforesaid REALITIES,

We, therefore, call for the promotion of sustainable, responsible and equitable management and utilization of our natural resources, toward the conservation and protection of the environment and rehabilitation of mined areas.

We call for the REPEAL OF THE MINING ACT OF 1995 (RA 7942) and REVOCATION OF ARROYO’S REVITALIZATION OF THE MINING INDUSTRY (EO 270 and 270-A), which are ANTI-FILIPINO, ANTI-ENVIRONMENT AND VIOLATIVE OF HUMAN RIGHTS,

We call for the ENACTMENT OF THE CONSOLIDATED ALTERNATIVE MINERALS MANAGEMENT BILL pending in the House of Representatives,

We further call for an IMMEDIATE MINING MORATORIUM and suspension and cancellation, if applicable, of all mining operations, licenses and applications, while the relevant mining policies are being reviewed; and concerned government agencies be held accountable.

With this declaration, we therefore INVOKE

OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A BALANCED AND HEALTHFUL ECOLOGY IN THE SPIRIT OF PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND INTER-GENERATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

Reiterating the words of our brother MACLIING DULAG, an environmental martyr of the Cordilleras:

“Such arrogance to speak of owning the land, when you shall be owned by it. How can you own that which will outlive you?”

LET THIS DECLARATION RECLAIM THIS LAND FOUGHT FOR BY THE HEROES AND MARTYRS OF THE FILIPINO PEOPLE.

ALL THESE FOR TRUTH, COUNTRY, AND THE COMMON GOOD.

Source: www.ecoteneo.org

2 responses to “[From the web] MINDANAO DECLARATION: Defending The Dignity Of Life, Securing Our Future- www.ecoteneo.org”

  1. you have cellphones… you have the internet… laptops, desktop pcs, tablets, iphones, tvs, cemented homes, aircons, cars, jeepneys, tricycles, motorcycles, coins, paper (made from machineries), toothpaste, diamond rings, necklaces, earrings, spoons and forks, plates, clothes, watches, toys… buildings, projectors, projector screens, laser pointers, chalk, eraser boards…. all are directly or indirectly by-products of mining… so wHy? i am not saying we should not protect the environment… but if you really really think about it… our whole existence is a threat to it…. so by all this, do you mean to say we sacrifice our development over the environment?

    also, large-scale mining is opted over small scale is for one: (1) they can and will be able to take responsibility for their area (2) better mining practices (3) do mine site rehabs

    can we not find ways to compromise? at this point in time, we are pretty much dependent on mining. you know this, we know this, so again WHY? is this the sole solution to all those corruption, human rights violation, etc? will it really end with mining being banned?

    Like

    1. The declaration is not against mining, but against the way mining companies operate. It says so right there: We call for the suspension or cancellation of mining activities, WHILE the relevant mining policies are being REVIEWED; and concerned government agencies be held ACCOUNTABLE.

      The existing law makes it to easy for the foreign mining companies. There are not so many rules they have to follow, and if there arem they find a way around them. That’s why the declaration is for the Repeal of the Mining Act of 1995 (RA 7942) and the revocation of Arroyo’s revitalization of the mining industry. The Enactment of the Consolidated Alternative Minerals Management Bill recognizes the importance of mining for the Philippine economy. If it is done well, the country can get a self-reliant, strong and progressive domestic economy to get out of underdevelopment. But with the way thinks are now, with foreign companies taking all what is to be gained, this will not happen.

      So of course, they are against the way mining is taking place right now. People are being killed over mining. Directly by the mining companies if they dare to portest against a mine comming in their area. Or indirectly, by the choices mining companies make. For example proposing a new mine, while knowing it will effect the environment and the lakes and rivers, and thus the agriculture, fishery, drinking water, etc. By doing this, they already violate human rights; the right to food, the right to water and the right to sustainable lifelyhood.

      Yes, computers, cellphones, cars, buildings are very handy, and it would be hard to live without it. But can you eat a cellphone? Can you drink a building? It will be even harder to live without food and water.

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Discover more from Human Rights Online Philippines

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading