Tag Archives: Bataan Nuclear Power Plant

[Statement] Nuke is the Past, Renewable is the Future! -NFBM

Nuke is the Past, Renewable is the Future!

Let us not retrogress by embracing nuclear power plants when most nations are turning their backs on this technology and have since embraced renewable solutions since the meltdown of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in 2011.

File photo from NFBM FB page

Let us remember that scientists have still to provide a suitable solution to the radiated water leaking onto the Pacific from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Fukushima prefecture, Japan. It is estimated that more than 3 million irradiated or contaminated water has found its way to the Pacific Ocean from the Fukushima Nuclear Plant.

Let us not invite trouble to befall our nation in putting up our own nuclear power plant, whether they be located on land or floating over water like the Russian model.

Nuclear Free Bataan Movement urges Philippine Energy Secretary Cusi to put the 200,000 MW renewable energy potential (combined wind, solar, hydro, biomass, and geothermal capacity) of the country into fruition. We need to learn from other countries’ experiences like Japan (Fukushima), Russia (Chernobyl), the US (Three Mile Island), and our historic stance as a people that resulted in the mothballing of the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant.

We believe the need for new power plants, especially a nuclear power plant, is being bloated. It is business interests and not public interest that drives this development– same with the expansion of coal plants in the province of Bataan, regardless of its impact on health, economic sustenance of affected communities, not the general public that will benefit with the expansion of coal plants in Bataan despite adverse health and economic impact onto the general public.

Our current energy strategies are short-sighted and not even taking into account that the world has less than 12 years before we reach a critical point regarding climate change.

We believe that the current government is banking on blindsiding the Filipino people by fast-tracking its push to go nuclear, relying on its heavy-handed and punitive reprimand of critics to silence any opposing voices.

We echo the words of former Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan that nuclear power is unsafe and too expensive to build anywhere in the world.

The International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale classifies the Fukushima Daiichi incident and Chernobyl (1986) as major nuclear accidents. These are events that involve the major release of radioactive material with widespread health and environmental effects requiring the implementation of planned and extended countermeasures.

We can only imagine the extent of devastation if a similar event occurs in the Philippines. No amount of technical expertise can enable us to cope with this worst case scenario.

October 2, 2020
Reference: Francisco Honra
Secretary General, NFBM

Submit your contribution online through HRonlinePH@gmail.com
Include your full name, e-mail address, and contact number.

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos, etc

[Statement] A Statement of Concern from the people of Bataan -NFBM

A Statement of Concern from the people of Bataan

NFBMThe Nuclear-Free Bataan Movement stands firm in its opposition to the rehabilitation of the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP) located in Morong, Bataan in particular and the reliance on nuclear energy in general as this energy still remains the deadliest energy source ever invented by man.
This threat to man and environment has been further underscored by the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant which has been continuously leaking contaminated water into the Pacific Ocean.

This despite measures to chemically-treat the surrounding soil, to serve as barrier to the water tainted with dangerous radioactive materials, according to nuclear watchdog, Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority.

The nuclear nightmare which has gripped Japan since 2011, should serve as a living reminder to countries like the Philippines and other Asian neighbors who are toying with the idea of building and operating nuclear plants. Simply put, the risks are not worth it and it should never be.

This is why we see no reason to revive the BNPP as we have a vast source of renewable energy from geothermal, wind, solar and hydro resources that are yet not sufficiently tapped.

The idea that nuclear energy is ‘too cheap to meter’ has been proven a fallacy since the first nuclear plant was built. In reality, nuclear power plants end up costlier to maintain, the sheer size of the project makes it vulnerable for corruption and shady deals. Most probably, like the first BNPP deal which was valued at USD600Million but ballooned to USD 2.3Billion.

We may find ourselves replacing oil dependency with nuclear dependency as we would need to import uranium in order to make our reactors work.

We appeal to DOE and Duterte’s good sense and sound judgment not to rehabilitate the BNPP. It is the same plant, already proven to be riddled with defects, more than three decades older and still unacceptable.

It is Deadly: It sits on Mt. Natib, a caldera-forming volcano like Mt. Pinatubo and Mt. Mariveles, which makes up the whole northern Bataan Peninsula and is very near to active fault lines such as Manila Trench-Luzon Trough.

We have not forgotten. We are Bataenos and Filipinos who view with concern and alarm the proposal to rehabilitate the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant.

Thus, we re-affirm our stand that Now, is NOT the time and there should never ever be any attempt to gamble with the high risk nuclear technology which has been proven fundamentally dangerous and unsafe. Instead, it’s time to permanently close the mothballed BNPP and cease from pursuing nuclear energy program. We reiterate our call that a safe world is a nuclear-free world.

November 14, 2016

References: Francisco Honra, Secretary General
Atty. Dante Ilaya, Co-Chairperson
Nuclear-Free Bataan Movement

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally
published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or
change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and
original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the
tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc

[Statement] Power Crisis Solution Should Exclude Nukes, Coal – NFBM

Power Crisis Solution Should Exclude Nukes, Coal – NFBM

For some years, we used to be second to the US in producing geothermal energy, globally. But our combined renewable energy potential (wind, solar, hydro, biomass and geothermal) around 200,000 MW, is set aside in favor of carbon-intensive energy plants like coal and even the worrisome revival of the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP).

NFBM

The Department of Energy and former Rep. Mark Cojuangco are at it again.

Using the issue of the imminent power crisis as an excuse, they are once again trying to influence and shape a pro-nuke stance from among the people of Morong and Bagac during its public forum held last July 25, 2014 in Bagac, Bataan.

President Aquino’s recent State of the Nation Address last Monday alluded to his administration’s determination to address the power crisis.

As members of Nuclear Free Bataan Movement (NFBM), we want to tell him that the solutions should veer away from the coal dependency exhibited by his Philippine Energy Plan (PEP), especially in the light of real climate change implications.

The World Bank and the International Energy Agency, in March 2012, warned that at least 80 per cent of known reserves of fossil fuels must be left untapped if the world is to avoid a catastrophic temperature rise.

Yet, here we are constructing 24 new coal power  plants contributing 52.8 million tonnes/year more of carbon dioxide emissions and an additional 20 more proposed in the next  2-5 years , not to mention entertaining the idea of rehabilitating the BNPP as if the continuing tragedy in Fukushima has not shown how devastating a nuclear disaster could be.

These plants will not be for the 2.7 M Filipino who are without electricity; rather these plants are geared for business, mining operations and economic enclaves like in our case here in Bataan.

Indeed, the Philippines is ‘ more open for business’ but on the other hand, it will leave our people in the dark as electricity supply remains private and expensive,  as high as in Japan.

Now is NOT the time to gamble with the risk of nuclear technology which has been proven fundamentally dangerous and unsafe.   Instead, it’s time to shut down the (nuclear) program permanently.  Thus, we reiterate our call that a safe world is a nuclear-free world.

PRESS STATEMENT
July 30, 2014

References:
Rev. Msgr. Antonio Dumaual, NFBM Chairperson – 09178679242
Francisco Honra –  Secretary General – 09188974643

[Press Release] Fukushima Ocean Leak, An Indictment to BNPP Re-activation- NFBM

Fukushima Ocean Leak, An Indictment to BNPP Re-activation- NFBM

NFBM

We are Nuclear Free Bataan Movement (NFBM), a broad-based network that is opposed to the re-activation of the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant found in Morong, Bataan in particular and the continued reliance to nuclear power in general. NFBM is opposed to the revival of the BNPP as nuclear energy still remains the deadliest energy source ever invented by man.

This threat to man and environment is further underscored with recent news that the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, has been found leaking contaminated water into the Pacific Ocean.

This leak continues despite measures to chemically-treat the surrounding soil, to serve as barrier to the water tainted with dangerous radioactive materials, according to nuclear watchdog, Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority.

NFBM condemns the plant operator, Tokyo Electric Power Co. or TEPCO for being slow to own up to its shortcomings and quickly address the issue of the leak, two years after the Fukushima plant was shutdown following the typhoon and tsunami in March 2011.

According to reports, ‘highly radioactive water’ from the Fukushima plant is pouring out at a rate of 300 tonnes a day.

“ There must be no foot-dragging, when public safety is at stake, especially since the level of contamination in the sea has yet to be determined, even according to Japanese scientists,” said NFBM chairperson Msgr. Antonio Dumaual.

“ With radioactive chemicals leaking into the sea, fishermen are faced with a radioactive nightmare, as there have been reports that TEPCO found fish contaminated with high levels of radiation inside a port of the plant as early as January of this year,” added Dumaual.

“The nuclear nightmare which has gripped Japan since 2011, should serve as a living reminder to countries like the Philippines and other Asian neighbors who are still toying with the idea of building and operating nuclear plants. Simply put, the risks are not worth it. and it never would be,” averred Dumaual.

He urged the Japanese government to compel TEPCO to clean up its mess, already adversely affecting not only the present but will affect even the next generation, especially since the clean up is expected to drag on for (40) forty years and cost at least 11 billion US dollars.

References:
Monsignor Antonio Dumaual, NFBM Chairperson – 09178679242
Atty. Dante Ilaya, NFBM Co-chair – 09175232683

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[People] The Power Mess: How We Got into It and How to Get Out By Walden Bello

The Power Mess: How We Got into It and How to Get Out
By Walden Bello
INQUIRER.net
April 23, 2012

With the electricity rates in Luzon now among the highest in the world and Mindanao plagued by daily brownouts, the power situation in the Philippines can only be described as a mess. How did we work ourselves into this jam?

Well, there are several landmarks on the road to our current power crisis.

Three Landmarks on the Road to Crisis

The first was the decision, during the Marcos period, to build the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP). BNPP, a 620-Megawatt (MW) facility, was supposed to fill the additional demand for electricity in Luzon from the 1980’s on. The only problem—and a big one—was that the technology was unsafe and the plant was situated in a seismically active area and on the slope of a volcano–Mt. Natib–that could not be certified as dead.

BNPP had to be cancelled, and the Fukushima tragedy of 2011 proved in retrospect how correct that decision was. But not surprisingly, with the main power project designed to fill growing demand in Luzon sidelined, rolling brownouts hit the country in the early 1990’s. The administration of President Fidel Ramos then committed the second big blunder, which was to hurriedly contract independent power producers (IPP’s) to fill the power gap. With their notorious “take-or-pay” provision–meaning distributors had to pay for a specified amount of power whether they used it all up or not–IPP contracts pushed up the cost of electricity tremendously. The power retailers like Meralco were not about ready to absorb the added cost, so they passed it on to the consumer.

The third milestone was the privatization of the National Power Corporation (NPC or Napocor) in 2001 via the so-called EPIRA law.

The Faulty Assumptions of EPIRA

EPIRA was informed by two heroic assumptions. The first was that the sale of government energy facilities would result in proceeds that would pay off Napocor’s massive debt, which reached P943 billion by 2001. As President Aquino described it at the 1st Mindanao Power Summit over a week ago, “The idea behind it [EPIRA] was: NAPOCOR would sell its power plants to private investors, and use the proceeds to pay its debt. This was supposed to put an end to the never-ending, increasing debt.”

The second assumption was that privatization would make the generation and delivery of electricity more efficient and thus bring down the cost of power. Private is better than public; the market is more efficient than the state: This was the neoliberal faith that was so enthusiastically embraced by Philippine technocrats in the 1990’s. This was the mindset that saw not only the surrender of NPC assets to the private sector but also the sale of the highly profitable Petron oil refining corporation to foreign interests and the ceding of the provision of water in the Metro-Manila area to the Ayalas and the Lopezes by the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS).

The reality that followed differed from the assumptions behind EPIRA.

First of all, the anticipated revenue did not materialize since NPC facilities were disposed off at fire sale terms. For instance, according to a report by the renewable energy group MinCARED , the Masinloc Geothermal Plant in Zambales, valued at $390 million, was sold to private investors who made an initial down payment of only 40 per cent, with the balance to be paid in seven years at $80 million yearly—an amount that is actually the average yearly income of the plant itself! Similarly, the National Grid Corporation of the Philippines (NGCP) put in an initial payment of $987.5 million, or 25 per cent to acquire TRANSCO, NPC’s transmission facility. The remaining $2.92 billion or 148 billion pesos will be paid in 15 years. TRANSCO is earning an average of 15 billion a year, which is more than enough to cover NGCP’s yearly installment payment. In other words, as the analysis put it, “NGCP has only minimal investment in its acquisition of a highly profitable jewel of our country.”

Not surprisingly, the sale of NPC assets at extremely disadvantageous terms to the private sector has produced a situation in which NPC debt has not diminished but instead climbed from P943 billion in 2001 to P1.24 trillion in 2009.

The assumption that market forces would result in cheaper electricity owing to greater efficiency likewise did not pan out. The cross-ownership of power producers and electricity distributors allowed by EPIRA did not lead to greater competition but to what economist Edna Espos described as “institutionalized oligopoly …where the market is dominated by a small number of players who are able to collectively exert control over supply and market prices.” A key institution that EPIRA set up was the Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM). Originally designed to be a mechanism for identifying and setting prices based on quantities of electricity transacted between many power generators and retailers, WESM’s prices actually came to reflect the dynamics of the collusive oligopoly that replaced the state monopoly.

Not surprisingly, the rates of Meralco, the country’s biggest power distributor, jumped by 112 percent over 10 years, while the rates charged by NPC went up by 95 per cent. Instead of dispersal of ownership, only a handful of groups – San Miguel Corp., the Aboitizes, the Lopezes, and “Manny Pangilinan Inc.”– control 52 percent of power generation. As Rep. Ben Evardone put it in a privilege speech in January of this year, “The EPIRA has obviously only harnessed the domination of only a few corporations in both the generation and distribution of power to the detriment of the Filipino power consumers. This can be attributed to the watered-down safeguards against monopoly in the electricity sector.”

Derailing Renewable Energy

Even as EPIRA floundered, the methods of power generation based on fossil fuels came under criticism for environmental reasons, including their contribution to global warming, of which the Philippines was a prime victim. The result of the widely felt need for a new direction in energy policy was the Renewable Energy Act of 2008, which sought to transform the country’s energy mix to one that was predominantly reliant on renewable sources like hydropower, solar, wind, and biomass. However, half-hearted commitment on the part of the Executive and resistance from business, which said renewable energy (RE) development would make power even more expensive, stalemated any move in the direction of RE. Instead, business interests, notably the Aboitizes, took advantage of projections of electricity demand to promote coal, the dirtiest energy source–both in terms of its impact on health and climate change–as the answer to the power crisis. From less than 10 per cent in 1991, coal plants now generate over 30 per cent of the country’s power. There are currently 11 coal-fired plants in the country, and plans are being accelerated to set up more. Most controversial is the Aboitiz project in the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority which is projected to produce some 400 to 600 MW to “stave off brownouts in Luzon by 2014,” according to Energy Secretary Rene Almendras. Equally controversial is the Department of Energy’s plan for Mindanao, which envisions the installation of 1000 MW of coal-powered energy capacity in the next few years. Almendras, a former Aboitiz executive, has become the high priest of coal, though it is probably technocratic belief in the efficacy of coal rather than ties to the company that drives his advocacy.

Mindanao: Battle Ground of Energy Paradigms

Mindanao has now become the site of the battle between pro-RE groups and pro-coal forces brandishing the argument that that energy source is the only way to meet that region’s rising demand. Currently, Mindanao has the most RE-friendly energy mix, with hydro, geothermal, and other renewable sources accounting for 60 per cent of energy generating capacity, in contrast to 42 per cent in the Visayas and a mere 32 per cent in Luzon, according to UP Professor Clodualdo del Mundo. Central to the energy complex of the region are the Agus-Pulangui dams, which generate 52 per cent of the region’s power supply. Mindanao’s largely hydro-based system also enjoys the lowest generation charge among the country’s regions, coming to 2.8 pesos per kilowatt hour–compared to 4.3 pesos in Luzon and 4.0 pesos in the Visayas, where the generation cost is tied to the international price of oil and coal on which power generation is dependent. Yet, owing to the deterioriation of the Agus-Pulangui dams, supply has become erratic, especially during the dry season. Rehabilitation of the two dams is badly needed. Also, siltation of the Agus River in Lanao and the Pulangui River in Bukidnon has deprived the dams of the amount of water needed for them to function at full capacity. As a consequence, the electricity provided by the hydropower plants has been reduced by about a third from its former level, according to a report in the Manila Times.

Given their central importance to Mindanao, the deteriorating condition of the Agus-Pulangui complex strikes some observers as suspicious. As the Freedom from Debt Coalition put it in its Open Letter to President Aquino, “There are indications that vested cartels are positioning themselves to corner a huge share of the electricity market by allowing the intentional decay of said power plants,” a development that “will also virtually guarantee long-term high electricity prices, since contracts will be pegged to the volatile oil market and the ever increasing international price of coal.”

Distrust is also being sown by DOE’s plan to add 1000 MW worth of capacity whereas its estimate of Mindanao’s current shortfall is only 100 MW. Pro-RE advocates suspect that the agency is preparing a major expansion of coal plants not only to support rising residential and industrial demand but also respond to the projected demand from the mining operations, including coal mining. Their suspicions have been further stoked by Almendras’ publicly proclaimed goal of making the Philippines’ self sufficient in coal and his plan of exploring “30 coal areas” in the country.

The Way Out of the Mess

So how do Mindanao and the country as a whole fight their way out of the power conundrum? The following plan, consisting of immediate, medium-term, and long-term components, is distilled from the proposal of a number of groups, such as Freedom from Debt Coalition, the Mindanao Congress of Advocates for Renewable Energy and Rural Electrification and Development (MinCARED), and Akbayan.

First of all, say RE advocates, there must be a multipronged effort to address the immediate crisis. Secretary Almendras must rescind his recent order to electric coops to fill surplus demand by buying electricity from private power plants and barges at 14 pesos per kilowatt hour.

Two, the four power barges still under government control, each of which can generate 32 MW, must be deployed to Mindanao, to produce electricity that can be sold to consumers price based on the generating cost of 2.8 or 2.9 pesos per kilowatt hour. Power from these barges, along with power from the Agus-Pulangui, should meet most of current demand, with the remainder of the shortfall filled by energy conservation efforts devised by LGU’s in cooperation with electric cooperatives.

Three, the NPC must immediately upgrade the Agus-Pulangui hydro units, rehabilitating equipment, dredging the silt from the Agus and Pulangui Rivers, and undertaking watershed reforestation to promote sustained water flow.

Moving to the medium term, under the terms of EPIRA, Mindanao has been given a brief reprieve, meaning NPC’s assets there have not yet been sold to the private sector. This reprieve must be made permanent. Instead of turning over Agus-Pulangui to the private sector, a body could be set up along the lines of Rep. Maria Isabel Climaco’s proposal for a “Mindanao Power Company,” which would be a government-owned-and-controlled corporation, but with a multisectoral board, that would own, operate and control the Agus-Pulangui hydro power complexes. The idea, says Climaco, “is to have Mindanaoans be responsible for powering Mindanao.” Part of the financing of company could come from Mindanao’s 26 provincial governments.

In the long term, both for the sake of Mindanao and the whole country, EPIRA must be repealed. More than a decade after it was enacted, EPIRA has delivered the opposite of what it promised: higher electricity rates, an energy sector unable to cope with growing demand, inefficient provision of electricity, and a greedy oligopoly.

There must also be a decisive reversal of the trend to setting up more coal plants. While the expansion of coal is being justified as a temporary step as renewable energy projects are waiting to come on stream, the reality is that it will set up a massive fossil-fuel base energy infrastructure that is permanent, with all the damaging consequences for the environment and public health. The RE Act must, in short, be implemented, immediately. The feed-in tariff and other investment incentives must be deployed, and the latest innovations in solar, wind, biomass, and min-hydropower from Europe and China must be adapted to local conditions. While some RE projects have high start-up costs, in the long run these will fall and make RE equally if not more efficient than fossil fuels, and without the latter’s high environmental costs.

Also important is the institutionalization of citizen and consumer participation at all levels of energy planning to ensure accountability and transparency. The kind of brazen undermining of the Renewable Energy Act by the DOE in its promoting the expansion of the coal option must never be allowed to happen again.

Financing the Transition

Putting this energy plan into effect will take money. Where can this be sourced? Currently, the government is allocating over 20 per cent of the P1.8 trillion budget to creditors, many of whom have been paid many times for loans—including energy sector loans like the BNPP–that were given at crushingly high interest rates over the last four decades. A negotiated or unilateral reduction of debt repayments would release the funds much needed for putting in place a renewable energy infrastructure for the 21st century. An initial step might be the cancellation of fraudulent loans. As Lidy Nacpil of Jubilee South has pointed out, this is becoming politically feasible: in 2007, Congress actually approved a general appropriations bill with a provision on suspending debt payments for 17 loans that were found to be fraudulent. From that provision alone the government was expected to save approximately P29.5 billion that it could have devoted to pressing social or energy needs, but the measure was vetoed by then President Arroyo.

Many development economists, among them Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, have increasingly reached the conclusion that countries with massive debt loads will find it very difficult to develop, owing to the channeling of national financial resources to debt repayment. In contrast to the Philippine experience, in Argentina, the late President Nestor Kirchner unilaterally reduced the debt burden of the country to foreign bondholders from 100 cents to the dollar to some 25 cents to the dollar in 2003. The bondhholders howled, but they eventually gave in. The result was an impressive 10 per cent per annum growth rate between 2003 and 2008 as financial resources were rechanneled from debt service to domestic investment.

If our country is to develop, if it is to have a 21st century renewable energy infrastructure, courage like Kirchner’s needs to be displayed by our leaders.

*INQUIRER.net columnist Walden Bello is a member of the House of Representatives representing Akbayan. He was formerly Chairman of the Freedom from Debt Coalition.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[In the news] Pagbuhay ng Bataan Nuclear Power Plant, tinutulan ng isang obispo -GMA News

Pagbuhay ng Bataan Nuclear Power Plant, tinutulan ng isang obispo.

GMA News
April 12, 2012

Mariing tinutulan ng isang obispo ng Simbahang Katoliko ang mungkahing buhayin ang kontrobersiyal na Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP) para mapaghandaan ang posibilidad na krisis sa enerhiya.

Ayon kay Bataan Bishop Ruperto Santos, suportado ng Simbahan ang posisyon ng mga mamamayan ng Bataan na tumutol na buhayin ang BNPP.

Iginiit niya na dapat matuto ng leksiyon ang Pilipinas sa nangyaring krisis sa Japan nang magkaaberya ang kanilang nuke power plant sa Fukushima nang maganap ang malakas na earthquake sa nabanggit na bansa noong nakaraang taon.

Muling nabuhay ang usapin tungkol sa paggamit ng nuclear power plant dahil na rin sa nararanasang krisis sa enerhiya sa Mindanao.

Ngunit iginiit ni Santos na hindi dapat ikompromiso ang kaligtasan at kalusugan ng tao at maging ang kalikasan na maaaring malagay sa panganib kapag nagkaaberya ang BNPP.

Read full article @ www.gmanetwork.com

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[In the news] Almendras: No more nuclear future for Bataan plant – PhilStar.com

Almendras: No more nuclear future for Bataan plant
By Ding Cervantes, The Philippine Star
January 19, 2012

 CLARK FREEPORT, Pampanga, Philippines – The idle Bataan nuclear power plant (BNPP) definitely no longer has any nuclear future and might have to be totally abandoned for other purposes, Energy Secretary Jose Rene Almendras said here.

“A coal-fired power plant is being considered, but the conversion cost seems too high so it might be better to consider a new plant,” Almendras said at a press conference during an “energy forum” held here Tuesday by the Department of Energy.

Almendras, however, said the government has not closed its doors to new nuclear technology developments that would take into consideration the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan as a result of the devastating tsunani triggered by a powerful quake in northeast Japan in March last year.

“Maybe in five to seven years from now, that new technology would be available and these are plants that can withstand risks,” he said, citing proposals to construct smaller nuclear plants producing lesser power.

Almendras also noted previous studies showing that the BNPP is not on an ideal site.”

He was referring to findings that the plant, whose construction started in 1976 during the Marcos administration, was located on an earthquake fault zone and too near Mt. Pinatubo whose eruption in 1991 was said to be one of the most powerful in recent history.

Read full article @ www.philstar.com

[In the news] Aquino: Finish what Ninoy started – sunstar.com.ph

Aquino: Finish what Ninoy started
By Jill Beltran and Jonathan de Santos

MANILA — President Benigno Aquino called on the nation Sunday to make sure his father’s assassination 28 years ago was not for nothing.

Aquino, speaking at the opening of an exhibit of cartoons and photographs commemorating the life of his martyred father, Benigno Aquino Jr., said the country owes it to itself to finish what the elder Aquino started.

Before the President’s speech, videos of his father’s speeches and interviews were shown on a widescreen projector.

Among the issues tackled by the late senator was the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP), which he said was overpriced. He said the contract price for the nuclear reactor at BNPP could have bought four reactors.

Read full article @ www.sunstar.com.ph