Tag Archives: Rizal Park

[Event] Mass and Procession for TRUTH and JUSTICE on Sep13-AMRSP

Mass and Procession for TRUTH and JUSTICE

AMRSP Sep 13

amrsp

Dear Fathers, Brothers, Sisters,

Greetings of peace from AMRSP!

Attached you will find our invitation for this coming September 13 activity. We explained in the flier the rationale of the said activity.

We are following with much interest the events that are unfolding now in our beloved country. Issue after issue, problems after problems preoccupied the news. In all that is going on, our prophetic responsibility compel all of us to make our voice be heard by all concerns. We cannot be idle with what are happening around us.

We are aware that as Church we have so many concerns to address too. Yet as an Association we set our priorities for campaign. The issue on Truth and corruption is one of the many concerns that we have to give our attention to. The activity for September 13 is one of the many activities lined up by many sectors including us to pressure the government to heed the call of the people for the total abolition of the Pork Barrel, may it be Congressional or Presidential.

Please come on September 13. Join us as we pray for our country. The mass will be held in San Agustin Church, Intramuros, Manila at exactly 2:00 in the afternoon. After the mass, we shall march in procession to join and interfaith service and program at the Luneta. Our Protestant brothers and sisters will join us in the procession to Luneta.
Be there and be counted!

Sincerely yours,

Fr. Marlon Lacal, O.Carm
AMRSP Co-Executive Secretary

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Statement] Fund People’s Protection against Poverty and Inequality -KAMP

Fund People’s Protection against Poverty and Inequality

KAMP

President Benigno Aquino III’s pronouncement scrapping the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) could have been an affirmation of government’s subservience to people’s sovereignty, but the president chose to hoodwink the people and cheat on his own “matuwid na daan”.

He announced the abolition of the annual Php25 billion lump-sum appropriation and its removal from the discretion of lawmakers, but in the same breath offered it again as a multi-purpose fund for legislators. What makes this more suspicious is the president’s continued silence on his own and Vice-President Jejomar Binay’s discretionary funds of P450 billion and P200 million, respectively. Aside from the 7.8 % exclusionary GDP growth, this is another sign of PNoy’s misplaced priorities.

The Kampanya para sa Makataong Pamumuhay (KAMP) denounces the president’s cheap tricks. People’s taxes are people’s funds and must be used for the benefit of the people.

Prioritize public spending on people’s protection against poverty and inequality

Official statistics show the country’s glaring poverty incidence and gross disparity in terms of access to resources and essential services. Measures should be implemented to ensure income and wealth redistribution, and protect the people already reeling from the financial crisis that threatens to get worse. PNoy should go beyond the confines of his current fragmented, temporary and palliative social assistance and institute a comprehensive and universal social protection program provisioning for a life of dignity for all. This includes:
Universal health care based on the primary health care principle that ensures the well-being of the citizenry and not limited interventions in times of illness;
Generation, not merely facilitation, of employment with living wages and of livelihoods protected against unfair competition and monopoly by big capitalists;
Guaranteed and quality education;
Living pension or subsidy for the elderly and the differently abled;
Socialized housing programs that guarantee adequate and humane shelter for all;
Access to and availability of basic services such as water, power and transportation.

Review budget laws and processes and ensure equitable sharing of national revenues

KAMP does not buy the line that only Senators and members of the House of Representatives know what development projects to propose and approve and how much of the people’s money should go to their favored districts and sectors. This lame excuse for patronage politics, in effect, continues to distort national economic planning and undermines development programs. Provided there are clear national priorities and responsive development plans, local development and resource allocations are best left to the local government units. This is based on the assumption that the pork barrel system is eliminated from the national down to the local level, and people’s participation is accepted as part of the political process.

Lump-sum funds or lawmaker-sponsored projects only foster increased reliance on favors from the president and the legislators. The question of ensuring that territorial and political subdivisions get equitable share of national revenues immediately calls for a review of the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) formula and criteria to check if these are still relevant to the current needs of localities.

The pork barrel scandals involving public officials also point to the need to fix loopholes in budget laws and processes starting with the review and amendment of the Administrative Act of 1987. The national budget exercise has been corrupted to an extent that the “power of the purse” which used to be exercised by Congress to check and balance the president’s fiscal powers has been surrendered by legislators more concerned with getting a substantive slice of public funds.

Strengthen mechanisms for people’s participation; Pass FOI bill

PNoy administration’s bottom-up planning and budgeting approach is a welcome effort to encourage people’s involvement in determining projects responsive to their needs. The process, however, should be more inclusive of the wide range of civil society formations. Moreover, bottom-up planning and budgeting requires strong people’s movements and participation.

P-Noy’s statement on the PDAF seems to focus more on the Napoles P10 billion pork barrel scam by banning the NGOs from receiving public funds. Yet this is just the tip of the iceberg. What has scandalized the people to outrage are the extent and thoroughness of budget scams that have defrauded them of vital social services and protection, and the involvement of the executive and legislative officials, the bureaucracy, NGOs and even religious leaders. Implicated too is the judiciary by turning a blind eye to the scams. More than ever, the need to pass the Freedom of Information bill becomes more urgent, and tests the administration’s and legislators’ sincerity in addressing the web of corruption that has engulfed the entire political system.

Transparent and Thorough Investigation

All transactions related to the misuse and abuse of all discretionary funds, not just PDAF, must be investigated by the newly formed Inter-Agency Anti-Graft Coordinating Council (IAAGCC). This includes appropriations and disbursements done under the administration of PNoy.

IAGCC’s investigation must not result only in punishing the guilty and in recovering stolen assets. The council’s work must also aid in strengthening laws and processes on the utilization of public funds and point out the accountability—the sins of commission and omission—of concerned public officials in the performance of their duties. The list of robbers in government includes all those who feign public interest for personal gain and disregard the people’s will. PNoy joined this list when he attempted to cheat the people out of their victory over corruption.

Let the Million People March to Luneta and Mendiola on Monday, 26 August 2013, be a reminder to the president and all public officials that this government exists to serve the interest of the people and not the other way around.

Fund Social Protection Against Poverty and Inequality!
Life of Dignity for All!

KAMP is a broad, multi-sectoral and inclusive network that is focused on pushing for universal and transformative social protection towards attaining social justice. It pushes for a five-point agenda: employment guarantee, universal health care services, adequate food, humane housing, and social insurance particularly universal pension for the elderly and differently-abled, and agricultural insurance.

[Press Release] Solons, top officials asked to lower pay to minimum wage -PM

Solons, top officials asked to lower pay to minimum wage

pmLogo1

The Partido ng Manggagawa (PM) challenged senators, congressional representatives and top executive government officials to lower their pay to the level of a minimum wage earner. “If our peak legislative and executive officials are in position for public service and not to wallow in pork then they should be amenable to a radical pay cut. Besides they can better craft law and policies beneficial to the masses once they experience the life of the ordinary worker,” asserted Renato Magtubo, PM chair.

The labor group issued this call as people mobilized today for the anti-pork barrel protest in Luneta and other key cities in the country. PM’s chapters in Metro Manila and Southern Tagalog are joining the Luneta rally this morning while its members in Cebu, Bacolod, Iloilo and Iligan are also participating in similar activities in the provinces.

PM is advocating an “Apat na Dapat” set of demands to address the pork barrel scandal. First, the abolition of all forms of pork barrel, principally the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF), the Presidential Social Fund (PSF) and the special purpose funds. Second, the realignment of pork to fund universal social protection from Philhealth coverage to public employment. Third, people’s participation in the budget process from identification of programs and projects to evaluation. And last, the passage of the Freedom of Information bill to enhance transparency and accountability in government spending.

Magtubo said that workers are interested in the protest against pork barrel since through the system of withholding taxes, employed people are taxed on time and pay fully. “Even the informal sector of the working class—the urban and rural poor—pay more than their fair share of taxes since every good and service they buy has value-added tax,” he added.

“But workers do not just want to curb corruption by abolishing the pork barrel. We also want to curtail patronage by removing the discretion of politicians in the delivery of social services. Public services must be accessible to all Filipinos as a right without the need to beg for the indulgence of politicians.” Magtubo explained.

“Just to cite an example, realigning the proposed P25.2 billion PDAF in 2014 can pay Philhealth premiums for a year to 14 million Filipinos, a third of the adult population. The PSF and other presidential pork like the Malampaya funds can cover the Philhealth coverage of the rest of the population to ensure universal health insurance in one stroke,” Magtubo ended.

Press Release
August 26, 2013
Partido ng Manggagawa
Contact Renato Magtubo @ 09178532905

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Press Release] Workers ask Luneta marchers: Demand realignment of pork to social services -PM

Workers ask Luneta marchers: Demand realignment of pork to social services

pmLogo1

The workers group Partido ng Manggagawa (PM) called on the people who will be joining tomorrow’s rally at Luneta to demand the realignment of the pork barrel to a fund for universal social services. The group also praised the organizers of the Luneta march in its determination to push through and demand the abolition of the pork barrel.

“Workers salute Luneta protest organizer Peachy Rallonza-Bretana for refusing to be placated by President Benigno Aquino III’s proposed pork barrel reform. We however ask them to also demand a new fund distribution system wherein social services will not be based on the discretion of politicians but will be accessible as a matter of right,” Renato Magtubo, PM chair explained.

PM is joining the rally in Luneta tomorrow that will call for the abolition of pork barrel and the prosecution of those involved in the scam. The group’s chapters in Cebu, Bacolod, Iloilo and Iligan are also participating in similar activities in the provinces.

The labor group is advocating the realignment of the pork barrel into a fund for universal social protection. “The Priority Development Assistance Fund, the Presidential Social Fund and other incarnations of the pork barrel must be directly allotted to social services that will be accessible to all Filipinos and not be subject to discretion of political patrons. In this way, the evil of patronage and corruption is removed from the delivery of necessary social services such as Philhealth coverage, socialized housing, scholarships, farmers’ subsidies and public employment” explained Magtubo.

He added that “Only the politically naïve will swallow PNoy’s alibi that pork barrel is necessary to deliver social services to the grassroots. The pork barrel is a political not a development tool. On the part of the national government, the pork barrel is a carrot to buy the support of Congress. While on the part of solons, pork barrel is indispensable to sustain the dependency relations with ward leaders and ordinary voters.”

PM asserted that the reforms declared by the President about the congressional pork barrel are not enough. “At best the reforms may curb rampant corruption but PNoy’s insistence in maintaining the pork barrel means he is strengthening it as an instrument of patronage,” Magtubo averred.

Press Release
August 25, 2013

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Press Release] Teachers join Luneta protest to leave legacy for children -TDC

TEACHERS JOIN LUNETA PROTEST TO LEAVE LEGACY FOR CHILDREN

logo TDC

Teachers under the banner of Teachers’ Dignity Coalition (TDC) call on their fellow educators to join the massive protest against the pork barrel system and the rampant corruption in government on Monday, August 26 at the Luneta Park in Mnaila. This despite the pronouncement made by President Aquino last Friday that he will soon abolish the PDAF.

“The pronouncement is just a ploy to weaken the growing unity and anger of the people against corruption in government. The crooks in the bureaucracy should be punished, regardless of their party affiliation, whether in Senate, HoR or the executive branch.” Benjo Basas the chairperson of the TDC said in a statement.

Teachers were enraged by the report that the JLN Corporation headed by the alleged pork barrel scam queen Janet Lim-Napoles paid less amount of taxes than the average public school teacher in the years 2009-20011.

“The people who keep the state operating thru their shares of taxes should be the recipients of the services from the government. Public funds should not be used for patronage politics and lavish lifestyle of the elected officials and their cohorts.” Basas explained. “Corruption-free governance would mean a better spending for basic social services like education, health, public transpiration, housing and environmental care among others.” He added.

The group called on the teachers and the people in general to remain vigilant and to denounce the corruption in all branches of the government at all levels.

“By marching on the streets on Monday, we could leave a legacy for our students and our own children that they will grow-up in a country free of corruption and thievery and would make them proud as Filipino people.” Basas ended.

The group’s central slogan is “Scrap the Pork, Jail the Crooks, Fund our Schools!” #
Reference: Benjo Basas, National Chairperson 0920-5740241/3853437

ADVISORY: Teachers’ Preparation for Rally

Tomorrow, Sunday starting 10:00AM, TDC members will prepare the materials needed for the rally on Monday- banners, placards, sound system, printed t-shirts and cultural presentation. Some leaders from Metro Manila are expected to come to their office to bring plain white t-shirts for printing.

White would be their color motif in solidarity with the protest movement in Luneta whose participants are expected to wear white shirts to symbolize purity and political neutrality. In Luneta, the group along with their respective families will share their “baon” for a symbolic picnic. However, TDC will bring their group banners for they will be joining the initial program of various groups in Liwasang Bonifacio at 9:00AM then they will march and join the “colorless” Luneta crowd before noon and will also join the march to Mendiola after the Luneta gathering.

Attached are the poster and the t-shirt design that will be used by the TDC in the protest.

Anti-PDAF tshirtTeachers Honest Taxpayers5 PINK white box

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Featured Event] Million people march to Luneta August 26: sa araw ng mga bayani. Protesta ng bayan!!!

MILLION PEOPLE MARCH TO LUNETA AUGUST 26: SA ARAW NG MGA BAYANI. PROTESTA ng BAYAN!!!
By Power ng Pinoy

1 million march to luneta

— LATEST ANNOUNCEMENT !!! —-
1. Tuloy ang Million People March
Sa Luneta Grandstand, 9am-2pm
2. We were heard but we want him to listen.
We have more to say.
– ABOLISH PORK BARREL
– WE DEMAND TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY

———————————————-

TARA LET’S DO THE MILLION PEOPLE MARCH TO LUNETA! AUGUST 26, ARAW NG MGA BAYANI

WE, THE TAXPAYERS, WANT:
1. THE PORK BARREL SCRAPPED.
2. THE SENATORS AND CONGRESSMEN IN THE PORK BARREL FUND SCAM INVESTIGATED AND CHARGED ACCORDINGLY, WITH FULL MEDIA COVERAGE FOR THE PEOPLE TO SEE.

HOW: With a massive “pocket picnic” get together

WHEN: 26 August 2013, 9am

WHERE: In front of the LUNETA Grandstand

COLOR: ANY COLOR YOU CHOOSE, NOT DICTATED BY ANYONE OR ANY GROUP.

STATUS/MEME/TWEET: I am *NAME* PINOY ako. I pay my taxes, on-time & in-full. YOU, my government, owe me a full explanation. @ProtestaNgBayan

HASHTAG:#TayoAngBoss #OnePinoy #MillionPeopleMarch #ProtestaNgBayan

No group banners. No political colors. No Speeches.
Just ALL OF US ordinary, tax-paying people showing GOV’T THEY ANSWER TO US. TAYO ANG BOSS DITO.

We need this outrage, anger to reach critical mass. SPREAD THE WORD. REPOST.”

‘Yan ang Power ng Pinoy!

“PASINTABI na po , pasasalamat, at pahiram sa kung sinoman po ang nagdisenyo ng KAMAO na unang ginamit sa “Pass the RH Bill” Campaign. Angkop-angkop po lamang para sa protesta kaya naglakas-loob na po kaming gamitin. SALAMAT PO NG MARAMI.”

Read more @https://www.facebook.com/events/406846762761075/410222192423532/?notif_t=plan_mall_activity

Iboto ang iyong #HRPinduterosChoice para sa HR EVENTS.

Ang botohan ay magsisimula ngayon hanggang sa 11:59 ng Nov 15, 2013.

Ikaw para kanino ka pipindot? Simple lang bumoto:
• i-LIKE ang thumbnail/s ng iyong mga ibinoboto sa HRonlinePH facebook, i-share at
ikampanya.
• Bisitahin ang post sa HRonlinePH.com (links sa bawat thumbnail) at pindutin ang button sa
poll sa ilalim ng bawat nominadong post.
• Most number of the combined likes sa FB at sa poll buttons ang magiging 3rd HR Pinduteros
Choice na kikilalanin sa 2013 HR week celebration.

Makiisa sa pagpapalaganap ng impormasyon hinggil sa karapatang pantao. Pindot na!

WHAT IS 3RD HR PINDUTEROS CHOICE AWARDS? https://hronlineph.com/2013/10/01/3rd-human-rights-
pinduteros-choice-awards/

Iboto ang iyong #HRPinduterosChoice para sa HR CAMPAIGN.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Statement] Ibasura ang Pork Barrel! Pondo ng Bayan, Direktang Ilaan sa Serbisyo at Kabuhayan -KAMP

KAMP on Pork Barrel

Ibasura ang Pork Barrel!
Pondo ng Bayan, Direktang Ilaan sa Serbisyo at Kabuhayan

Kahindik-hindik para sa Kampanya para sa Makataong Pamumuhay (KAMP) ang patuloy na pagkiling at pagtatanggol ng Pangulong Noynoy Aquino sa taunang alokasyon ng 25 bilyong pisong pondo ng bayan para sa Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) o mas kilala sa tawag na “pork barrel” sa kabila ng umaalingasaw na anomalyang kinasasangkutan dito ng maraming mga mambabatas, kasama na ang mga kaalyado ng kasalukuyang administrasyon.

Malaking insulto sa mamamayan na hindi malaman ni PNoy kung paano at saan ilalaan ang pondo sakaling tanggalin ito sa kamay ng mga nagpapasasang konggresista’t senador. Nakapagtatakang may nakikita pa siyang kabutihang naidulot ng PDAF samantalang malinaw na hanggang ngayon ay nananatiling tatlo sa bawat sampung Pilipino o 27.9 porsyento ng kabuoang populasyon ng kanyang mga “boss” ay naghihikahos at nadagdagan ng 600,000 ang dami ng mga nakaranas ng gutom mula Enero hanggang Marso 2013.

Nasaan ang pakinabang at sino ang nakikinabang sa buwis ng sambayanan? Kapos na kapos ang serbisyong nararapat para sa mamamayan. Sa halip na gamitin ang pondo para sa pangkalahatang proteksyong panlipunang magtitiyak ng wastong pamamahagi ng kita at kayamanan ng bansa tungo sa makataong pamumuhay para sa lahat, pilit na pinanatili ni PNoy ang kalakarang nakasalalay sa personal na pagpapasya ng iilan kung paano gagastahin ang kaban ng bayan.

Wala raw pondo para sa pangunahing karapatang pantao

Noong Marso 2013, ibinasura ni PNoy ang mungkahing batas, Magna Carta of the Poor, na magtataguyod ng limang pangunahing karapatang-pantao: wasto at sapat na pagkain, disente at abot-kayang pabahay, trabaho at kabuhayan, de-kalidad na edukasyon at serbisyong pangkalusugan. Ang dahilan: walang pondo at hindi nailagay sa dokumento ang katagang “progressive realization” o papa-unlad na pagsasakatuparan ng mga karapatang ito.

Ang taunang 25 bilyong pisong alokasyon sa PDAF ay katumbas ng pabahay para sa 62,500 pamilyang informal settler (P400,000 bawat isa). Halos 30 porsyento ng 92 milyong Pilipino ay informal settler. Tatlong taon nang naghihintay ang 104,000 pamilyang mahihirap na nakatira sa mga peligrosong lugar sa Metro Manila para sa katuparan ng P50 bilyong pabahay. Pautang pa ito ni PNoy samantalang ang PDAF ay libreng ipinamimigay!

Sa 25 bilyong piso, halos 14 milyong Pilipino na ang libreng maisasali sa programa ng PhilHealth gaano man kakapos ang serbisyong ibinibigay nito. Kahit paano’y maiibsan sana ang mahigit 50 porsyentong gastusin sa serbisyong pangkalusugan na direktang nanggagaling sa bulsa ng mamamamayan (Philippine National Health Accounts 2011).

Marami pang katumbas ang perang ito. Labas pa ito sa pondong nakalaan para sa mga programang nakatakda na sa ilalim ng mga ahensya ng pamahalaan at sa mismong pork barrel ng presidente.
Buwis, i-direkta sa Serbisyo, hindi sa bulsa ng sira-ulo
Tama si PNoy nang sabihin niya sa panayam ng mamamahayag na si Maki Pulido na kung sira-ulo ang magmamaneho ng kotse, pwedeng managasa. Pero alam na nga niyang sira-ulo, bakit bibigyan pa ng kotse? Unang-una, bakit ka mamimigay ng kotse na hindi naman sa iyo?

Malinaw na hindi buung-buong napapakinabangan ng mamamayang Pilipino ang PDAF. Panahon pa ng namayapang konggresistang si Romeo Candazo, ibinulaga na niya ang karumal-dumal na kalakaran sa paggasta sa pera ng mamamayan. May “kick-back” ang mga konggresista na umaabot sa mahigit kalahati ng presyo ng bawat proyektong pinopondohan ng pork barrel.

Tama at napapanahon na alisin na ang pork barrel. Tama at makatwiran na imbestigahan si Janet Lim-Napoles upang mapalutang ang mga senador at konggresistang kasabwat nito sa karumaldumal na krimen sa taumbayan. Ngunit, mas makakamit ang tunay na hustisya kung ang PDAF ay direktang pakikinabangan ng mga mamamayan.

Nararapat na ito ay ilaan sa proteksyon ng mamamayan laban sa lumalalang kahirapan at inekwalidad. Pondohan ang pagpapalawig sa serbisyong pangkalusugan, makataong programang pabahay lalo na sa mga maralita, paglikha ng trabaho, insurance para sa mga nawalan at hindi makakuha ng hanapbuhay, nakabubuhay na pension at suporta para sa mga matatanda at specially o differently abled, tiyak at de-kalidad na edukasyon para sa mga kabataan.

Alokasyon at Paggasta ng PDAF, walang Partisipasyon ang Mamamayan. Desisyon ng presidente ang alokasyon ng PDAF. Personal na diskresyon naman ng konggresista o senador kung paano gagastahin ang pondo.

Sa kalakhan, walang mahigpit na koordinasyon ang administrasyong Aquino sa mga civil society organizations kaya nakalusot ang mga pekeng NGO na naging kasabwat pa ng ilang mambabatas sa korupsyon sa pork barrel. Tama lang na maging mahigpit ang mga patakaran para sa mga grupong tumatanggap ng anumang tulong na gagamit ng mga pag-aari ng publiko.

Pagdating sa mga konsultasyon, kalimitang isinasali ng administrasyong PNoy ay mga kaalyadong organisasyon. Kung mapasama man ang mas malawak na pormasyon, puro mabilisang pagpupulong lang at madalas ay isinasantabi ang mga mungkahi ng mga ito sa kadahilanang walang “accreditation”. Suwertehin man na maimbita sa mga limitadong konsultasyon, wala pa ring saysay ang partisipasyon kung walang pagkilala ng mga ahensya ng pamahalaan.

Maraming paraan, hindi lang sa pamamagitan ng pork barrel, upang tiyaking ang buwis ng taumbayan ay direktang magsisilbi sa interes ng sambayanan. Ang mahalaga, paigtingin ng gobyerno ang mga mekanismo para sa malawak at makabuluhang partisipasyon ng mga mamamayan mula sa pagbubuo ng plano hanggang sa implementasyon at pagsubaybay dito. Ang kagyat na pagsasabatas ng Freedom of Information Bill ay isang kritikal na hakbang upang matiyak na sinusunod ng gobyerno ang mga prinsipyo ng accountability, transparency at partisipasyon ng publiko sa mga desisyon at gawain ng pamahalaan.

Honor ng mga Aquino: puro pagbabayad ng ilehitimong utang?

“Honor all debts” ang isang pamosong slogan ng ina ni PNoy, ang namayapang Presidente Cory Aquino. Dahil dito naisakripisyo ang serbisyong panlipunan para relihiyosong bayaran ang mga utang ng Pilipinas na karamihan ay hindi pinakinabangan. Nangutang pa ang gobyerno para bayaran ang mga ilehitimong utang na pinagpasasaan lang ng pamilyang Marcos at mga crony nito.

Ngayon, “honor all political debts” yata ang nasa likod ng katigasan ng sampalataya ni PNoy sa PDAF—isang paraan upang patuloy siyang suportahan ng mga pinagkaka-utangan niya ng kanyang tagumpay sa eleksyon at mapasunod o makontrol ang mga mambabatas. At kung ang batas na kaniyang sinusunod ay tulad ng Automatic Appropriations Law on Debt Servicing na awtomatikong nagtatakda ng budget sa pambayad-utang nang walang konsultasyon sa mamamayang pumapasan nito, delikado ang sambayanan.

Sa ganitong klaseng kalakaran, walang ibang natitirang sasandalan ang taumbayan kundi ang sarili niyang lakas at kapangyarihang singilin at sipain ang mga tila nagpapanggap na lingkod-bayan.

Sa ika-26 ng Agosto, aangkinin ng mamamayang Pilipino ang lakas at kapangyarihang ito: Isang milyong martsa sa Luneta at Mendiola. ###

Ibasura ang Pork Barrel!
Makataong Pamumuhay Para sa Lahat!

Kampanya para sa Makataong Pamumuhay (KAMP)
Ika-21 ng Agosto 2013

Iboto ang iyong #HRPinduterosChoice para sa HR NETWORKS POST.

Ang botohan ay magsisimula ngayon hanggang sa 11:59 ng Nov 15, 2013.

Ikaw para kanino ka pipindot? Simple lang bumoto:
• i-LIKE ang thumbnail/s ng iyong mga ibinoboto sa HRonlinePH facebook, i-share at
ikampanya.
• Bisitahin ang post sa HRonlinePH.com (links sa bawat thumbnail) at pindutin ang button sa
poll sa ilalim ng bawat nominadong post.
• Most number of the combined likes sa FB at sa poll buttons ang magiging 3rd HR Pinduteros
Choice na kikilalanin sa 2013 HR week celebration.

Makiisa sa pagpapalaganap ng impormasyon hinggil sa karapatang pantao. Pindot na!

WHAT IS 3RD HR PINDUTEROS CHOICE AWARDS? https://hronlineph.com/2013/10/01/3rd-human-rights-
pinduteros-choice-awards/

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Press Release] Teachers, families join picnic on the last day of vacation -TDC

 

Teachers, families join picnic on the last day of vacation

logo TDC

 

As a final farewell to vacation, some 50 teachers from Metro Manila, Cavite and Bulacan gather today in Luneta Park, Manila for a family day picnic organized by the Teachers’ Dignity Coalition (TDC). Teachers are expected to come with their families and bring their own food and picnic mats.

The activity aims to highlight the sacrifices of the Filipino teachers, who, despite low salaries and heavy workloads amidst the continuing shortages in public school resources and low education budget, selflessly offer themselves for the benefit of the Filipino children and the nation as a whole.

Thus, the teachers call on the government to prioritize their welfare especially their salaries so they would not need to seek for other sources of income and could focus on their school tasks and give more time for their families.

Benjo Basas, the group’s national chairperson said that while teachers find the government’s treatment on the sector wanting, they are still willing to commit themselves for to teach the Filipino children.

“It is because of these shortages and the low salaries of teachers that push us to take odd jobs on the side just to make ends meet, sometimes giving-up our quality time to prepare lessons and even the quality time for our very own families.” Basas explained.

Teachers ask President Aquino to increase education budget in order to hire more teachers, build more classrooms and purchase education materials for public schools. For their salary, teachers ask for a P9000.00 across the board increase for state education workers, which is a pending bill in both houses of Congress.

Lastly, they are also asking the Department of Education (DepEd) for the immediate release of the performance-based bonus (PBB) which supposedly due on the first quarter of this year. #

Reference:
Benjo Basas, TDC National Chairperson, 0920-5740241

Cases for interviews:
1. Marcelina Dumaging, a teacher of Potrero ES in Malabon City. A mother of 3, two are in college and the youngest is an incoming grade 8. Her husband is a driver. Ma’am Cely is a grade level leader, works 6 hours in classroom and tasked to perform other duties. She also accepts tutorials and offers Boardwalk and Avon products. (0939-3940141)

2. Emelenado Arevalo, a Mathematics master teacher of Bagong Barrio NHS in Calocan City. He has 3, two sons are in college while the youngest child is in grade 6. His wife is a field researcher who often comes home late. Sir Meng is currently taking his PhD for better opportunities. He is having a tutorial job for additional income. He is tasked to do household chores after school and tutorial works. (0928-2006828)

NEWS RELEASE
June 2, 2013

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

sign petiton2 smallPhoto by TFDPcat alert icon copy

[Event] Teachers’ Family Day Picnic -TDC

Teachers’ Dignity Coalition
“Unity of Teachers to Regain the Dignity of Teaching Profession”
SEC Registration Number: CN 2007-10645
117-C Matatag St., Bgy. Central, Quezon City
Hotline: (02)3853437 • Telefax (02)4350036 • Mobile: 0920-5740241/ 0920-4142614
Email: teachersdignity@yahoo.com.ph • Website: http://www.teachersdignity.com/

ADVISORY
June 1, 2013

Activity: Teachers’ Family Day Picnic
Date: June 2, 2013, Sunday, 8:30AM at Lapu-lapu Monument area, Luneta Park, Manila

logo TDC
Details:

  • Some 60 families of teachers from Metro Manila, Cavite and Bulacan will join the Family Day Picnic at Luneta Park organized by the Teachers’ Dignity Coalition (TDC). Teachers are expected to come with their families and bring their own food and picnic mats.
  • The activity aims to highlight the sacrifices of the Filipino teachers, who, despite low salaries and heavy workloads amidst the continuing shortages in public school resources and low education budget, selflessly offers themselves for the benefit of the Filipino children and the nation as a whole
  • Thus, the teachers call on the government to prioritize their welfare especially their salaries so they would not need to seek for other sources of income and could focus on their school tasks and could give more time for their families
  • Teachers ask President Aquino to increase education budget in order to hire more teachers, build more classrooms and purchase education materials for public schools. For their salary, teachers ask for a P9000.00 across the board increase for state education workers, which is a pending bill in both houses of Congress.
  • Lastly, they are also asking the Department of Education (DepEd) for the immediate release of the performance-based bonus (PBB) which supposedly due on the first quarter of this year

Reference:
Benjo Basas, TDC National Chairperson, 0920-5740241

Cases for interviews:
1. Marcelina Dumaging, a teacher of Potrero ES in Malabon City. A mother of 3, two are in college and the youngest is in an incoming grade 8. Her husband is a jeepney driver. Ma’am Cely is a grade level leader, works 6 hours in classroom and tasked to perform other duties. She also accepts tutorials and offers Boardwalk and Avon products.
(0939-3940141)

2. Emelenado Arevalo, a Mathematics master teacher of Bagong Barrio NHS in Calocan City. He has 3, two sons are in college while the youngest child is in grade 6. His wife is a field researcher who often comes home late. Sir Meng is currently taking his PhD for better opportunities. He is having a tutorial job for additional income. He is tasked to do household chores after school and tutorial works.
(0928-2006828)

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

sign petiton2 smallPhoto by TFDP

[Appeal] Vendors face forced eviction and food insecurity -AHRC

Asian Human Rights Commission

PHILIPPINES: Vendors face forced eviction and food insecurity
February 22, 2013

ISSUES: Right to food; inhuman and degrading treatment; hunger, starvation, corruption; impunity; rule of law
Dear friends,

Asian Human Rights CommissionThe Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information from Defend Job Philippines about an eviction notice served on the vendors of Luneta Park (also called Rizal Park) in Manila. The proposed eviction will not merely leave the vendors jobless but also jeopardize their food security. It would also render many of them who stay inside their carts in the park homeless as they have nowhere else to go.
Ironically, it is not the National Parks Development Committee but the Police that has served the notice ‘informing’ the vendors that they would assist the NPDC in clearing operations.

CASE NARRATIVE:

Continuing the persecution of vendors of the Luneto Park, the Manila Police has served a notice of eviction on them through the Ermita Police Station. The notice informs them about the imminent eviction of them from all areas of the Luneto Park on 22 February while also telling them that the police would assist the National Parks Development Authority in the endeavour.

Most of the vendors have been living and vending their wares in the park for more than 15 years while some have spent even 30 years in park. Organised under the People’s Democratic Hawkers’ and Vendors’ Alliance (PDHVA), the vendors have approached the authorities innumerable times for getting their legitimate rights. The authorities, however, have been relentless in their persecution especially in the Phase 2, 3 and 4 inside the Park. Many of the vendors even live inside the park and sleep in their carts as their meager incomes do not allow them to afford renting a house and commute to the park daily. Forced eviction will force them into destitution.

The vendors has been hounded and arrested in the past at the behest of the NPDC. The situation remained unchanged even after 2004 when the Department of Tourism has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the vendors’ representatives and granted them the rights selling their wares inside the park while continuing with the negotiations. The vendors were also given a moving cart in exchange for them agreeing to keep the Park clean and orderly. The organised livelihood programme would have contributed to maintain the historical and cultural heritage of the Park but it was revoked unilaterally by the new NPDC director Juliet Vegas when she took charge. She ordered eviction of the vendors and demolition of their carts inside the park and led to huge chaos. Many vendors had to flee the Park.

The vendors led by PDHVA successfully resisted the assault and forced the NPDC to revoke a demolition order in first quarter of 2011. Further negotiations between the authorities and the vendors resulted in NPDC promising them better place in exchange for their former vending places while also asserting that it did not want the Park to look like a market. The authorities, however, surprised the vendors by going back on its promise and setting up tents in their former vending places for rent every Friday and Monday.

The director of NPDC issued another verbal order with no statutory backing ordering the vendors to pay a rent of 300 Pesos in phase 4 and 200 Pesos in phase 2. NPDC rationalized its order by arguing that they wanted to recover their expenses in setting up tents which they had rented out to big business including Retail Chains. The coming of these stores in the Park adversely affected the already dwindling income of the vendors who were now also forced to pay the unaffordable rents.

The NPDC delivered another blow to the vendors in Feburary 2012 by going back on its promise of giving them alternative space and asserted that it wanted to turn Luneta Park into a Zero Vending Zone. The vendors then approached the Department of Tourism which asked the NPDC to resolve the problem of the vendors but NPDC Director Juliet Villegas ignored the recommendation.

NPDC, instead of following the recommendation, upped the ante against the vendors and has been harassing and threatening them ever since. It forcibly evicted 15 vendors on February 6, 2012 inside the Halamanang Pilipino followed by another eviction of vendors and confiscation of their goods and personal belongings on February 15, 2012. The authorities launched another attack on the vendors on March 27, 2012 when more than 20 security person confiscated all the goods and personal belongings of the vendors while also physically assaulting them. They reportedly punched a pregnant vendor and brutally attacked the others.
The illegality of the attack is betrayed by the fact that vendors approached city mayor and got their confiscated goods released.

To assuage the vendors, officials of the Department of Social Welfare and Development approached them and asked them to fill up forms to work as street sweepers and immediately vacate their vending spaces. The employment offered, however was just for 3 months, leaving the vendors, dependent on daily earnings, with no choice other than refusing to accept it. The current assault continues the cycle of violence and intimidation against them and exposes them to hunger.

SUGGESTED ACTION:
Please write to the authorities mentioned below demanding immediate intervention in Ms. Sarathi Mondal’s case. You may also demand an inquiry into why she was not provided with ration card and benefit of other welfare schemes that she is entitled to.
The AHRC is writing separate letters to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food and Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing asking for their intervention in the case.

SAMPLE LETTER:

Dear __________,

PHILIPPINES: Vendors face forced eviction and food insecurity

Name of the victims: Vendors of the Luneta Park,
Place of incident: Manila, Philippines.

I want to draw your kind attention to eviction notice served on the vendors inside the Luneta Park. Continuing the persecution of vendors of the Luneta Park, the Manila Police has served a notice of eviction on them through the Ermita Police Station. The notice informs them about the imminent eviction of them from all areas of the Luneta Park on 22 February while also telling them that the police would assist the National Parks Development Authority in the endeavour.

Most of the vendors have been living and vending their wares in the park for more than 15 years while some have spent even 30 years in park. Organised under the People’s Democratic Hawkers’ and Vendors’ Alliance (PDHVA), the vendors have approached the authorities innumerable times for getting their legitimate rights. The authorities, however, have been relentless in their persecution especially in the Phase 2, 3 and 4 inside the Park. Many of the vendors even live inside the park and sleep in their carts as their meager incomes do not allow them to afford renting a house and commute to the park daily. Forced eviction will force them into destitution.

The vendors has been hounded and arrested in the past at the behest of the NPDC. The situation remained unchanged even after 2004 when the Department of Tourism has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the vendors’ representatives and granted them the rights selling their wares inside the park while continuing with the negotiations. The vendors were also given a moving cart in exchange for them agreeing to keep the Park clean and orderly. The organised livelihood programme would have contributed to maintain the historical and cultural heritage of the Park but it was revoked unilaterally by the new NPDC director Juliet Vegas when she took charge. She ordered eviction of the vendors and demolition of their carts inside the park and led to huge chaos. Many vendors had to flee the Park.

The vendors led by PDHVA successfully resisted the assault and forced the NPDC to revoke a demolition order in first quarter of 2011. Further negotiations between the authorities and the vendors resulted in NPDC promising them better place in exchange for their former vending places while also asserting that it did not want the Park to look like a market. The authorities, however, surprised the vendors by going back on its promise and setting up tents in their former vending places for rent every Friday and Monday.

The director of NPDC issued another verbal order with no statutory backing ordering the vendors to pay a rent of 300 Pesos in phase 4 and 200 Pesos in phase 2. NPDC rationalized its order by arguing that they wanted to recover their expenses in setting up tents which they had rented out to big business including Retail Chains. The coming of these stores in the Park adversely affected the already dwindling income of the vendors who were now also forced to pay the unaffordable rents.

The NPDC delivered another blow to the vendors in Feburary 2012 by going back on its promise of giving them alternative space and asserted that it wanted to turn Luneta Park into a Zero Vending Zone. The vendors then approached the Department of Tourism which asked the NPDC to resolve the problem of the vendors but NPDC Director Juliet Villegas ignored the recommendation.

NPDC, instead of following the recommendation, upped the ante against the vendors and has been harassing and threatening them ever since. It forcibly evicted 15 vendors on February 6, 2012 inside the Halamanang Pilipino followed by another eviction of vendors and confiscation of their goods and personal belongings on February 15, 2012. The authorities launched another attack on the vendors on March 27, 2012 when more than 20 security person confiscated all the goods and personal belongings of the vendors while also physically assaulting them. They reportedly punched a pregnant vendor and brutally attacked the others.
The illegality of the attack is betrayed by the fact that vendors approached city mayor and got their confiscated goods released.

To assuage the vendors, officials of the Department of Social Welfare and Development approached them and asked them to fill up forms to work as street sweepers and immediately vacate their vending spaces. The employment offered, however was just for 3 months, leaving the vendors, dependent on daily earnings, with no choice other than refusing to accept it. The current assault continues the cycle of violence and intimidation against them and exposes them to hunger.

I, therefore, urge you to

1. Immediately revoke the eviction orders against vendors in the Luneta Park,
2. Ensure that zero vending policy and the continued harassment of vendors under the same is stooped,
3. Ensure the reinstating of the stalls and the vending spaces to the vendors,
4. Ensure than genuine livelihood project for the vendors and their families is devised in consultation with their representatives,
5. Prosecute those guilty of the violations of the human rights of the vendors.

Sincerely,
_______

PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:

1. Mr. Benigno Aquino III
President
Republic of the Philippines
Malacanang Palace
JP Laurel Street, San Miguel
Manila 1005
PHILIPPINES
Fax: +63 2 736 1010
Tel: +63 2 735 6201 / 564 1451 to 80

2. Ms. Loretta Ann Rosales
Commission on Human Rights
SAAC Bldg., Commonwealth Avenue
U.P. Complex, Diliman
Quezon City
PHILIPPINES
Fax: +63 2 929 0102
Tel: +63 2 928 5655 / 926 6188
E-mail: chair.rosales.chr@gmail.com

3. Corazon Juliano-Soliman
Secretary, Department of Social, Welfare and Development
Constitution Hills, Batasan Pambansa Complex,
Quezon City
PHILIPPINES
Tel/Fax: +63 (2) 931-81-91

4. Sec. Joel Rocamora
Lead Convener
National Anti-Poverty Commission
3rd Floor, Agricultural Training Institute Building
Elliptical Road, Diliman
Quezon City
PHILIPPINES
Fax: +63 2 927 9796 / 426 5249
Email: napc.gov@gmail.com

5. Director
National Parks Development Committee
NPDC Compound
T. M Kalaw St, Rizal Park, Ermita
Manila
PHILIPPINES
Fax: +633027119
Email: info@nationalparks.ph

6. Secretary,
Department of Tourism
T.F. Valencia Circle
T.M. Kalaw St., Rizal Park
Manila.
PHILIPPINES
Email: webmaster@tourism.gov.ph

7. Mr. Jean Zeigler
UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food
Attn: Mr. Carlos Villan Duran
C/o OHCHR-UNOG
1211 Geneva 10,
SWITZERLAND
Tel: +41 22 917 9300
Fax: +41 22 9179010
Email: sect.hchr@unog.ch

8. Ms. Raquel ROLNIK
UN Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing
Attn: Ms. Cecilia Moller
Room 4-066/010
C/o UNOG-OHCHR
1211 Geneva 10
SWITZERLAND
Tel: +41 22 917 9265
Fax: +41 22 917 9010 (ATTENTION: SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ADEQUATE HOUSING)
Email: urgent-action@ohchr.org

Thank you

Hunger Alerts Programme
Right to Food Programme (foodjustice@ahrc.asia)
Asian Human Rights Commission (ua@ahrc.asia)

Visit our new website with more features at http://www.humanrights.asia.

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION – HUNGER ALERT PROGRAMME
Hunger Alert Case: AHRC-HAC-004-2013
22 February 2013

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[In the news] Diggings photos of SM Baguio spark protest among environmentalists | Sun.Star

Diggings photos of SM Baguio spark protest among environmentalists | Sun.Star.

March 30, 2012

PHOTOS of diggings inside the property of retail giant SM recently caused uproar among protesters and environmentalists opposing its planned mall expansion which will endanger 182 pine and alnus trees at Luneta Hill.

This prompted the Save 182 movement to come up with Earth Hour protests to jumpstart its call for a nationwide boycott of the popular mall chain.

Dubbed as Boycott SM Day, heeding the call of the BaguioBenguet bishop to boycott the mall until it reconsiders its expansion project, the group planned to coincide the activity with the annual observance of Earth Hour.

Karlo Altomonte of the Save 182 Movement said aside from switching off the lights for an hour on March 31, the group will show it cares enough about the planet and the children’s future by not patronizing SM.

Read full article @ www.sunstar.com.ph

[In the news] Environment suit singles outs SM, says mall’s defense lawyer | Sun.Star

Environment suit singles outs SM, says mall’s defense lawyer | Sun.Star.

By JM Agreda
March 16, 2012

“THIS is a suit that clearly singles out SM,” said Sigfrid Fortun, defense lawyer of SM Investments Corporation, while calling for the denial of a Temporary Environmental Protection Order against the mall giant.

In his response to the complaint filed by the Save 182 movement against the SM redevelopment, Fortun, in an interview Thursday, said the cause for action of the complainants is baseless.

Plaintiffs now oppose the balling and relocation of pine and alnus trees in the subject property without showing how that planned action was approved and authorized by the other defendants, namely DENR (Department of Environment and Natural Resources) and the city, will be deleterious to the environment as to cause plaintiffs material injury,” Fortun said in their answer to the court.

Citing photographs they acquired of the old Pines Hotel, Luneta Hill and the Central Business District showing a grassy plateau, Fortun said this is contrary to claims of complainants that the trees which will be affected are more than 100 years old.

“Luneta Hill does not have a forest cover. Because the entire Baguio then was grassland owned then by Mateo Cariño. If you take a look at these materials, all of these trees you see right now are not old growth pine trees but are new growth pine trees,” Fortun said.

Read full article @ www.sunstar.com.ph

[In the news] Ifugao lawmaker Teodoro Baguilat opposes cutting and earth-balling of pine trees in Baguio City | Sun.Star

Ifugao lawmaker Teodoro Baguilat opposes cutting and earth-balling of pine trees in Baguio City | Sun.Star.

By JM Agreda
February 7, 2012

IFUGAO Representative Teodoro Baguilat Jr. joined groups opposing the planned cutting and earth-balling of pines trees along the Luneta Hill in Baguio City to give way to the SM Baguio mall expansion.

Baguilat, chair of the House of Representatives national cultural communities committee, said the planned uprooting of some 182 alnus and pine trees is almost criminal.

Have something to report? Tell us in text, photos or videos.

He stressed the removal of the pine trees should not be allowed as they help make Baguio City unique among the cities in the Philippines.

“It is ironic that Baguio is named the City of Pines and yet developers from outside the city and the Cordillera are now there to remove them and are being allowed to do so,” he said.

He urged local officials to reflect on what kind of development they really want. “Do they want a city with greenery and pine trees or a city of malls and blocks of concrete and steel?”

The lawmaker also expressed fear that allowing one developer to uproot so many trees will open the floodgates for other developers to do the same or at an even grander scale.

“If we allow SM to do this to the trees, sooner or later, other developers would follow. People should realize aside from the cool weather and the Cordillera culture, the pine trees also define Baguio. To lose them would mean losing Baguio’s identity,” he said in a statement.

Kabataan Party-list Representative Raymond Palatino recently filed House Resolution 2069, which directs the House committees on natural resources and ecology to conduct a joint inquiry, in aid of legislation, on the legality and propriety of the permit granted by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) allowing the cutting and earth-balling of trees.

Read full article @ www.sunstar.com.ph

[In the news] Protest vs SM Baguio taps Twitter power – RAPPLER

Protest vs SM Baguio taps Twitter power – RAPPLER – Philippine News | Multimedia | Citizen Journalism | Social Media.

BY RAPPLER.COM

January 20, 2012

 MANILA, Philippines – Thousands protested against plans to redevelop and take down more than a hundred trees on Luneta Hill – to make way for a new SM City Baguio parking lot and entertainment plaza.

Multisectoral groups joined the protest even as a petition to stop a Department of Environment and Natural Resources permit that allows SM Development Corp to cut, ball or prune trees went online.

Protesters invaded Session Road and marched all the way to People’s Park. Likewise, close to 5,000 signed the petition and registered at least 10,000 recommendations.

Read full article @ www.rappler.com

[In the news] Protest action vs SM Baguio set on Friday – InterAksyon.com

Protest action vs SM Baguio set on Friday
by Likha Cuevas-Miel, InterAksyon.com
January 16, 2012

 MANILA, Philippines — A rally protesting SM City Baguio’s move to cut trees and uproot hundreds more will be held on Friday this week.

Non-government organizations and concerned citizens have called on Baguio City residents to join the protest rally on January 20, 2011 at 2 pm that would start along Governor Pack Rd. and end at People’s Park.

In a message dubbed as “Occupy SM: Cut your corporate greed, not the trees”, concerned citizens alleged that the Philippines largest mall owner and operator intends to cut 43 trees and uproot 139 more at Luneta Hill to make way for SM Çity Baguio’s new parking lot.

Read full article @ interaksyon.com

[In the news] ‘Real devotion should be reflective of true faith’ – InterAksyon.com

‘Real devotion should be reflective of true faith’
by Fr. Christian B. Buenafe, O. Carm, Commissary General, InterAksyon.com
January 14, 2012

 Some friends asked about my reflections on the Quiapo fiesta celebration where the traslacion (passage or procession) finally ended after 22 hours of procession, the longest traslacion in history as they say.

The feast of the Black Nazarene is commemorated every January 9 of the year. For Catholics, the highlight of the fiesta is the Eucharistic celebration being the apex of Christian liturgy. The traslacion is just a part of the entire fiesta event. However, through the years, people became more enthusiastic about the traslacion and considered it the central activity of the fiesta. Traslacion is the procession where the Poon Nazareno (image of Jesus, the Black Nazarene) is brought back to Quiapo Church after having stayed overnight at the Quirino Grandstand in Luneta. The traslacion starts immediately after the fiesta Mass is celebrated in the early morning of January 9.

This is not phenomenal or something that happens rarely because this is one of the most popular devotions of Filipino Catholics. It is not just a traditional practice by people but also a devotional expression and practice of their beliefs. The celebration doesn’t only take place in Quiapo but also in other churches in the different parts of the country where there are devotees of the Black Nazarene.

However, we have read and heard a lot of commentaries and varying opinions on the conduct of the Poon devotees in the traslacion.

The devotion to the Poon Nazareno is so powerful and can be seen in the ocean of people from all walks of life—young and old, men and women from all over the country moving like synchronized waves on the streets and corners of Manila. People will do anything just to go near the Poon. People wave their handkerchiefs or towels in white or maroon and throw that piece of cloth towards the Poon; the men surrounding and guarding the Poon (who are called hijos de Nazareno) wipe the cloth on the Poon and throw it back to its owner. At the same time, during the procession, some people hold on to ropes as they join the crowd’s movements, saying their prayers and singing songs of mercy to the Poon.

Read full article @ interaksyon.com

[In the news] Killing of defender of gays called a ‘hate crime’

Killing of defender of gays called a ‘hate crime
CARMELA G. LAPEÑA, GMA News
January 3, 2012

 As colorful fireworks lit up the Manila sky, 18-year-old Fernando Mendoza Jr. was on a jeepney with his friends and cousins early Sunday morning. They were headed to Rizal Park to celebrate the New Year.

Friends of Mendoza describe him as a quiet guy, but also one who would have the mettle to stop a fight. On this particular occasion, Mendoza came to the defense of a couple of gay passengers, who were being taunted by a group of ruffians. “Sabi ng bakla, ‘Huwag niyo kaming anuhin, kasi mabait kami,'” one of Fernando’s cousins narrated. “Tapos sabi ng pinsan ko, ‘Eh huwag niyo na nga anuhin, kasi mabait nga sila.’”

Mendoza’s intervention triggered a reaction that would end his life.

“Bigla niya pong sinuntok ‘yung pinsan ko, tapos gumanti po ‘yung pinsan ko isang beses. Tapos nag-away na po sa loob ng jeep,” said Mendoza’s cousin, whose identify is being withheld for her security.

Outnumbered, Mendoza jumped off the jeep and a chase ensued along crowded Avenida Rizal, before he stumbled in the middle of the street in front of Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center.

There to report on fireworks-related injuries, a GMA News team was waiting outside the emergency room when they heard the commotion. “Trobol, trobol,” people muttered as they rushed out in time to witness five men smashing bottles on Mendoza and kicking his head.

In video captured by GMA News, a man in a white sleeveless shirt is seen rushing toward the youth. The man shoots Mendoza with an improvised shotgun, or sumpak, as bystanders stand back in shock. After firing his weapon, the man and four others continue to beat the defenseless teen.

The suspects fled before anyone could stop them. A bystander approaches the boy and checks his pulse. “Buhay pa, buhay pa,” he cries out, and the teen-ager is rushed inside the hospital.

But it was too late. With six bullet fragments in the heart, he was pronounced dead at 2 a.m. on New Year’s Day.

http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/243357/news/metromanila/killing-of-defender-of-gays-called-a-hate-crime

[From the web] PHILIPPINES: Torture victims speaks out–“I still suffer from trauma after two decades” Interview 2

Source: www.humanrights.asia

An interview with torture victim Romeo Luneta published by the Asian Human Rights Commission

PHILIPPINES: Torture victims speaks out–“I still suffer from trauma after two decades” Interview 2

SPECIAL REPORT
Torture in the Philippines & the unfulfilled promise of the 1987 Constitution

OVERVIEW: In the second part of the interview, Romeo Luneta speaks about his experience during Martial Law. Years after the incident, he could still describe vividly and in detail his experience of torture. He has not obtained any form of psychological and trauma counselling treatment, only medicine to help relieve pain and alleviate hearing loss.

Self introduction: I’d like you to know that I am Romeo Luneta, Romeo E. Luneta, 69 years old, Filipino, widower, a victim of Martial Law. I was a victim of torture during the Martial Law Regime of Ferdinand Marcos.

I was detained under the pretext ‘cup of coffee’ by the military. I was offered, they say ‘a cup of coffee’ (when they arrested me for questioning) as they speak to me. And then as soon, I was made to board on a military jeep to their camp. I was told to first (disclose) my (personal) history. I did not. They force me to confess using force intimidation and all sorts of actions to make me comply with what they wanted.

First when I did not comply to their requirements to (disclose) my personal history they use dos por dos (a length of wood measuring 2×2), they beat my back, head and arm. It was dos por dos (that they used in assaulting me). For every question, whether (my reply was) right or not they hit me.

So I decided not to talk anymore because they were asking about the history of my brothers and sisters. I was the first amongst our siblings who was apprehended by the military at that time. We are nine siblings (in our family). I was the first person to be arrested. I was not able to elude the arrest so they got me. I was made to undress. They apply electricity on my penis, my testicles and when they would not accept any answer except for whatever thing I say they always hit me with the dos por dos. And a military instrument thing that later I came to know called kaburata.

Q: What is kaburata?

Victim: It looks like an eggplant. It is quite long. If it is used to inflict damage (pain) on a person’s body, it will not leave any torture marks (wound). The injured part would only swell and inflame. I was place under this interrogation from time to time. I could not tell the time because I was inside the (detention) cell. It was a cemented cell with iron bars. I would not know the time. I am just awakened by their siren. I did not know what particular time of the day (it was). Their siren awoke me and the light inside my cell was coloured red. (The lights) turns off, then on, then off, then on; and here comes my interrogator. I was asked questions sometimes. I was asked to drink liquid. They told me “it’s ok” and it was only a coffee.

Perhaps I was so hungry and thirsty. I just kept on drinking. Whatever the true nature of that liquid, I could not tell but I know it tastes bitter. So, I could not tell how long they had interrogated me. What I only know is that, every time they awaken me, they kept on asking about my siblings.

At first, they were asking whether I am my brother, Jose Luneta. They are forcing me to admit that I am my brother, Jose Luneta. What I thought, for me not to suffer any longer, why don’t I just admit it. So, I said yes. For some time they really believed that I was my brother, Jose. But by the day, obviously I was lying. They came to know that I was lying that I am not my brother. But for those people who knew me, I’m told that I really looked like my brother.

But later, again, they refused to believe that I was not Jose, they tortured me again. They forced me to admit that I know where Pepe (nickname of his brother Jose) is now. But I knew nothing about it. In fact, our siblings were separated from each other. We do not know where each one lives and had gone to.

Q: When you were adducted, could you still remember how old you were, what organisation you were part of and what organisation are you actively involved in at that time?

Victim: Kabataang Makabayan (KM). (It is a) youth organization. Actually, there were three of us who were told to organize the youth in the ST (Southern Tagalog) region. We complied with it because we were obedient youths. We were able to organise (the youth) in some provinces. There were many of us who were involved in organizing. Perhaps, KM was very popular at the time, there were so many of us.

It was because of the youth’s discontent (of Martial Rule), the organisation was so popular, they were looking for us like ‘like bees to honey’ (pulot sa pukyutan).

Q: When you were abducted, were you inside a house or in school?

Victim: I was with my girlfriend in their house. I was taken while I was at the house of my girlfriend because I (was ignorantly) went with the soldiers for ‘cup of coffee’. I rode on a military jeep.

Q: How many were they?

Victim: Three. But I did not know that there were others, wearing plain clothes, riding on another vehicle, following us. I came to know about it much later. I could say that because that is what I was told, too. But for those who were inside the military jeep, there were four of us. I could not know whether they took me (to the camp) right away or whatever. But once I boarded the jeep, they blindfolded me telling me that it was to prevent the dust from going into my eyes.

But soon after blindfolding me, they started asking me questions and I also started ridiculing them. You know, youth usually ridicules when they respond. But I do feel that there was something, and I started to feel concern. Of course! It was the military who arrested me. They started assaulting me. The one asking question was behind my back. So, every time he dislikes my reply to his question, he hit me. I started lying. All of what I have said was trying draw their attention to something else, that ‘I do not know anything’.

Q: What was that they were using to hit you? And which part of your body were you beaten?

Victim: (It was) Kaburata. Usually, they hit me in the nape of my neck, sometimes in my shoulders.

Q: Until you reach to the camp?

Victim: I do not know whether it was a camp or not. What I know, even after reaching to the place, they did not remove my blindfold. They dragged me inside the cemented detention cell. I heard the thud of my shoes. At that time, wearing boots was fashionable. I was wearing boots at that time, so I could hear the sound. I came to know that it was a cemented detention cell only after they threw me in and I heard the thud of my shoes. And every time they open the structure, you could hear a sound that you could hear probably made of steel. They pushed me in so I fell to the ground.

Afterwards, I was made to sit. When they started questioning me, I was still blindfolded. Then they slapped my face, they stopped hitting my head and face.

Q: How long were you held in military custody?

Victim: I could not tell whether it was daytime or nigh time. All I know is that I was there. I do not know whether my interrogator was a homosexual because he always kept on playing with my sex organ.

Q: While you are being questioned?

A: He was playing and sometimes hitting my sex organ. Perhaps that person had sexual aberration. They hit me, they ask me questions, but there is nothing that I can tell them. Even if I knew something, I will never tell them. Usually, even me, I had to tell a ‘story telling a lie’. I was held in military custody for six months.

Q: Did you know when were you surfaced?

Victim: I was surfaced because Amnesty International came to know that I was there. There was someone who made a report (of my detention), perhaps it was TFD (Task Force Detainees of the Philippines). It was TFD who told me that I was close to dying when they saw me. I was hardly given any food at that time. And even if I was given food, they only give me coffee and sometimes my interrogators spat in it. And when I taste it, it was already salty. I was presuming that perhaps sometimes, they peed on it.

Shortly after, they electrocuted me. They electrocuted my sex organ and my testicles.

Q: Do you mean in six months, the electrocution on you did not stop?

Victim: Sometimes, for a period of time none. I would know when they were about to electrocute me because I could hear the siren before they do it.

Q: Do you also mean that you were on blindfold for six months? Were your hands tied also?

Victim: I was blindfolded and my handcuffs were attached to my bed made of iron. And should they want to electrocute me, they could just pour water on me so it would be easy for them to apply electric current on my body.

Q: How about food, were you able to eat three times a day?

Victim: Very irregular. Even if I was fed three times a day; however, what they give me is a coffee like substance. They also fed me with, what they told me, pandesal (small piece of bread) very rarely. Perhaps, my interrogators fed me only when they could remember that they needed to feed me.

When I saw myself after I was release, I was so thin and my stomach looks like it doesn’t have anything in it. And since I have no food to eat, I just eat whatever they give me. I was so hungry. I did not bother anymore whether the food that they gave me had drugs on it. I just ate and ate. I had to eat. I also drank that liquid substance that told me coffee even though it tasted very salty.

Q: What do you think was the motive why you were invited for ‘cup of coffee’?

Victim: At first, I know that it was a military arrest, but about what they would do to me, I had no idea at all. I do not know what will happen to me. It was my first time to have been arrested and have problems like that.

Q: At that time, did you think of not going with the military?

Victim: What can I do? If I refuse to come, they will make trouble at the house of my girlfriend. I notice that her mother was already frightened. She was frightened that her daughter, my girlfriend, would also be taken. I told her she need not to worry because she has nothing to do with my problem

Q: Do you mean, when you were held by the military, you were not visited?

Victim: No. I had no visitors. Nobody knows except the military that I was held in detention at their camp.

Q: Was it only after six months that you were able to see you family again?

Victim: I did not see my family first. It was a friend, who was asked by my family, who came to see me first.

Q: What did the military say about your case? Did you have a case at all?

Victim: Nothing. When I was surfaced after I disappeared (in the military custody) for six months, they told me: “It is your fault because you are a member of Kabataang Makabayan (ikaw kasi eh miyembro ka ng KM kaya)”. I’m told that it was the reason of my arrest and that I was also involved in recruiting youth who would be member of KM.

Q: So, meaning there was no clear case at all?

Victim: I was told by Amnesty International that there was no charge on me. There was nothing.

Q: I would like to ask you about the Anti-Torture Law, now (unlike during Martial Law) that we already have a law against torture, what do you think of this?

Victim: All of what has been written as prohibited under the Anti-Torture Law has been done to me. I am not sure whether that ‘truth telling substance’ (sodium pentothal — truth serum), have been given to me as well. They fed me so many things that I could not tell whether it would be detrimental to myself. What I know is that I kept on talking every time I drank that bitter liquid substance that they gave me.

Q: What was reason why you were not release immediately since there were no charges on you?

Victim: They told me, they were waiting for my siblings to be arrested; and that they would also question them. But what I thought that after four years (of detention after I was surfaced), my siblings have already been arrested so perhaps they loosen on me. Perhaps, they had known also that my involvement (with the KM) was not that deep as they thought as I do.

(After I was released) nobody would like to talk to me. Everybody was so afraid. In our place, all of my friends have also been arrested. Some of them have disappeared.

Q: For four years after you were release, what was the effect of torture and the electrocution on you?

Victim: It took me a long time before I fully recovered. My children told me that sometimes they hear me shouting after I awake from sleep. Up to know, I continue to experience this. When I wake up, I was heavily sweating. I (feel) that the way I speak seems I am frightened. It took me a long time to be integrated because in our time there were no welfare components (in terms of assistance) for ex-political prisoners.

So, I drifted along by going to one organization to another organization looking for something to keep me by hoping that they could help me to stay alive. I feel that my fear usually emerges during night time, and I feel the weakening of my lungs, could be one of the effects of torture–maybe because (during my detention) my back was exposed to cement floor since there was no cover on it when I lie down to sleep. I feel that my lungs are weakened. I still feel pain on my head, particularly the part where they it was beaten. I feel that my being grumpy is also the effect of torture. I was not like this before and I should not be like this.

The feeling of being angry at persons, every time I hear a person raising his voice in speaking to me, I felt this type of person is my enemy. But I am not sure whether this is one of the effect of torture.

Q: So, how many months or years before you were able to recover?

A: I could not completely get over from it. On many occasions, I still feel terror and fear. I fear when I see military uniform and vehicles. Although I could overcome it, recently I thought to myself that I could control it, but the tendency of me (of feeling terror and fear) is too high.

Q: Are you still frightened when you see a military uniform and jeep?

A: Anything associated with the military (I feel frightened).

Q: Have you undergone post trauma therapy?

Victim: That is what is unfortunate. Nothing. The MAG (Medical Action Group), they only give me medicines when I get sick. My eardrum was ruptured and I had hearing loss due to interrogation. I was only given medicine to alleviate my hearing loss.

Q: When you were released, did you go with them (family members)? Were you not able to go home immediately?

Victim: I do not know. Although I was told that my father had also been detained for two weeks and the rest of the adult members of our family, but I did not know that. I came to know about this only after my family visited me after my release from jail.

Q: What do you think of the Anti Torture Law? Do you think this would be effective?

A: Ok (sign of approval to the law). This all depends on who would implement this law and also with the vigilance of the victims; however, even if there is already a law on torture, some of those in the military could still get away with it by torturing a person to death. We have a documented case wherein the victim disappeared and could no longer be located. He was abducted in open view of the public and they also know where he was taken, but they do not know whether he is still alive or dead.

Q: Had there been a law on torture during Martial Law, would you use the law to prosecute the perpetrators?

Victim: Yes. In fact, I also filed charges (against the perpetrators) but I do not know where it was filed. I know victims/detainees must not be tortured. We were victims (of torture) before, but we remain victims now because we were delisted (from the list of beneficiaries of claimants for compensation who are victims of Martial Law). But it is still OK. I still have my children to pursue my case. I will be very cautious not to be arrested, again. But I will still continue the work that I do for our fellow countrymen, for the Filipino masses, because I know that what I do is what is right.

Q: Do you have any message to other victims of torture?

Victim: They should remain strong because they know the risk of what they are into. This (torture) can never be acceptable in the International Law. If they will not hear us inside our country, we should unite with others who are working for the interest of the political prisoners.

Q: Do you have a message to the government, particularly on the implementation of the Anti-Torture Law?

Victim: (They should) make good the implementation of this Anti-Torture Law and all the other instruments against Human Rights Violation. This is the benchmark of being a civilized society.

——————–

The views shared in this interview do not necessarily reflect those of the AHRC, and the AHRC takes no responsibility for them.