Tag Archives: Marcos

[Statement] Kinukundena ng KATAPAT ang pagpapasa ng panukalang batas na nagnanais ipagdiwang ang buhay ni dating pangulong Ferdinand Marcos

OPISYAL NA PAHAYAG NG KABATAANG TAGAPAGTANGGOL NG KARAPATAN (KATAPAT) HINGGIL SA PAG-APRUBA NG KAMARA SA PANUKALANG BATAS NA NAGNANAIS IPAGDIWANG ANG KAARAWAN NI DATING PANGULONG FERDINAND MARCOS BILANG ISANG NON-WORKING HOLIDAY SA ILOCOS NORTE

Mariing kinukundena ng Kabataang Tagapagtanggol ng Karapatan (KATAPAT) ang naging hakbang ng Kamara sa pagpapasa sa ikatlong pagdinig ng isang panukalang batas na nagnanais ipagdiwang ang buhay ni dating pangulong Ferdinand Marcos, isang pasista at diktador, tuwing ika-11 ng Setyembre sa Ilocos Norte.

Ito ay lantarang pagbastos sa dangal, buhay, at sakripisyo ng mga naging biktima ng Batas Militar, ng mga nagmartsa sa lansangan noong 1986 na nauwi sa pagpapatalsik kay Marcos, at ng mga tumindig para sa karapatang pantao at demokrasya sa Pilipinas. Nakakagalit isipin na ang mismong buwan ng paggunita sa buhay at pakikibaka ng ating mga martir ay magiging buwan na rin ng paggunita sa mismong tao na nagpalaganap ng mga pag-aresto at pagpaslang sa mga tagapagtanggol ng karapatan, sa mismong tao na nagmalabis sa kapangyarinhan, sa mismong tao na nagnanakaw sa kaban ng Bayan.

Huwag sanang kalimutan ng 197 na mambabatas na pumabor sa panukalang batas na ‘to na si Marcos mismo ang nagbuwag sa Kongreso upang palitan ito ng Batasang Pambansa na napasailalim sa kanyang kapangyarihan. Hindi bayani si Ferdinand Marcos sapagkat isa siyang taksil at pasista na nagpahirap sa mga mamamayang Pilipino sa loob ng labing-apat na taon.

Tayo ay patuloy na manindigan sa tuwid na naratibo ng ating kasaysayan.

#NotoHistoricalRevisionism
#MarcosIsNotAHero
#DefendDemocracy

Submit your contribution online through HRonlinePH@gmail.com
Include your full name, e-mail address, and contact number.

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos, etc

[Press Release] Rights group uses “Wakanda Forever” sign to protest Marcos Day Bill or H.B. 7137 -TFDP

PRESS RELEASE
September 13, 2020

Rights group uses “Wakanda Forever” sign to protest Marcos Day Bill or H.B. 7137

Human rights group Task Force Detainees of the Philippines (TFDP) uses the movie Black Panther’s “Wakanda forever pose” in their social media campaign “Never Again to Martial Law” to protest House Bill No. 7137 (setting September 11 as President Ferdinand Edralin Marcos Day in Ilocos Norte) and the present authoritarian rule.

TFDP adopts the famous “Wakanda Forever pose” which was originally a symbol of salute to the fictional country Wakanda in the movie, Black Panther. “The crossed-arm or the X sign for this campaign signifies our resistance. We use it to express the call ‘NEVER AGAIN TO MARTIAL LAW’ and to resist any form of dictatorship in the present time,” said Fr. Christian Buenafe, O. Carm, TFDP Chairperson.

The campaign was launched online and can be seen in the group’s official Facebook page @taskforcedetainees (https://www.facebook.com/TaskForceDetainees) and Twitter account @tfdpupdates.

“We hope it would become a platform and a means for people to express their resistance in a popular way. The Thai people uses the “Hunger Games” hand gesture to protest, we will try to popularize the Wakanda forever pose or X sign for our resistance campaign,” TFDP explained.
“We do not extol a dictator. We constantly remind ourselves of his gross violations of human rights and his record-breaking thievery. This act is just a part of the grand scheme of the Marcoses to completely cover up their atrocities. The victims and their families are still on the arduous road to achieving justice, added Fr. Buenafe.

Emmanuel Amistad, TFDP Executive Director, stated that, “The proposed law is just one of the means of the Marcoses to distort history. They have been obviously utilizing all fronts to their advantage, especially since there seems to be a Marcos copycat in Malacanang and Marcos allies in Congress. They have also used the COVID-19 pandemic to limit people’s protest actions.”

“It has been said many times over, and we say it again, declaring the birth of a dictator as a holiday, even only in his birthplace, is an egregious act that is nothing short of disrespectful to the real heroes and martyrs who fought against dictatorship. This is a grave assault on human rights, justice and democracy,” Amistad lamented.

TFDP is living witness to the Marcos atrocities. The group was founded in 1974 by the Association of Major Religious Superiors in the Philippines (AMRSP) as a response to massive illegal arrests and detention, enforced disappearances, torture, massacre, hamletting, and other human rights violations.

TFDP was able to document close to 10,000 victims of human rights violations who eventually won in the Hawaii Class Suit against the Estate of Marcos. Some of the victims were also able to claim compensation under the Human Rights Victims Reparation and Recognition Act of 2013.

Submit your contribution online through HRonlinePH@gmail.com
Include your full name, e-mail address, and contact number.

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos, etc

[In the news] More martial law victims slam OSG: Why block reparation claims? -INQUIRER.net

Another group of former political prisoners during the martial law regime of President Ferdinand Marcos has questioned the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) for blocking what should have been the third payout of reparation claims granted human rights victims by a Hawaii District Court.

In a statement, Samahan ng Ex-Detainees Laban sa Detensyon at Aresto (Selda) described as “questionable” the motives of the OSG in refusing the settlement deal that would have distributed $13.75 million among 6,500 registered claimants in the class suit.

On Wednesday, the OSG, the Department of Justice and the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) said they had agreed on March 11 that the government would no longer enter into the settlement deal “in the best interest of the republic.”

The OSG, headed by Jose Calida, said it found the terms of the deal “grossly disadvantageous to the government and not in accord with existing Philippine laws and jurisprudence.”

Under the settlement agreement, the martial law victims would receive $13.75 million from the sale of four paintings illegally acquired by former first lady Imelda Marcos, with the government getting $4 million.

The remainder would be split between Golden Buddha Corp. and the estate of Roger Roxas, who discovered the so-called Yamashita treasure.

Read more @newsinfo.inquirer.net

Support #KarapatDapat na Agenda campaign! Click the poster to know more.

Submit your contribution online through HRonlinePH@gmail.com
Include your full name, e-mail address and contact number.

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[In the news] Sandigan to start forwarding records of Imelda Marcos’ graft case to SC -GMAnewsOnline

Sandigan to start forwarding records of Imelda Marcos’ graft case to SC

The Sandiganbayan has started the process of forwarding records in the graft case of Ilocos Norte Representative Imelda Marcos to the Supreme Court, where she will challenge her conviction for allegedly creating Swiss foundations to benefit her family.

The Fifth Division confirmed on Tuesday that Marcos’ notice of appeal has been “given due course.”

It said the records are being photocopied for the Sandiganbayan archives, but the original copies will be immediately transmitted to the SC upon completion.

This development comes after the Sandiganbayan granted the motion of Marcos to avail of post-conviction remedies, allowing the 89-year-old widow of former President Ferdinand Marcos to either appeal her conviction at the anti-graft court or raise her case to the SC.

Read full article @www.gmanetwork.com

Submit your contribution online through HRonlinePH@gmail.com
Include your full name, e-mail address and contact number.

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Event] Siklab Bayani Para Sa Katotohanan -CAMB-LNMB

Siklab Bayani Para Sa Katotohanan
Organized by the Coalition Against Marcos Burial in the Libingan ng Mga Bayani (CAMB- LNMB)

siklab-bayani-eventNov 30, 2016 (Wednesday, Bonifacio Day)
4pm to 12 midnight (puwedeng ma extend)
6pm (noise barrage; bring noise-makers) – Mag-ingay para sa hustisya!

Please wear BLACK.

https://web.facebook.com/events/841235039346958/

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally
published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or
change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and
original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the
tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc

[From the web] Never Again, Never Forget -Forum-Asia

Never Again, Never Forget
19 November 2016

ForumAsia LogoThe Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA) strongly condemns the burial of Ferdinand Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani, the cemetery of national heroes, in the Philippines. The burial of Marcos conveys a distressing message, not only to Filipinos but also to people’s movements all over the region that massive state-perpetrated human rights violations are being honoured. FORUM-ASIA extends its solidarity to all Filipinos who refuse to forget the past human rights violations, the plunder of the nation’s coffers, and the destruction of democratic institutions under the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos.

Ferdinand Marcos was the President of the Philippines from 1965 to 1986. He declared Martial Law and ruled the country with an iron fist from 1972 to 1981. Upon the declaration of Martial Law, all fundamental freedoms were curtailed, the Congress was suspended, and media was completely shut down. The opposition leaders and activists were arrested, detained, tortured, and killed. The grave corruption and neoliberalism economic policy under his rule triggered widespread resistance in urban and rural areas.

In 1986, after the snap election, more than two million Filipinos occupied the street of EDSA for three days from 22-25 February. The People Power Revolution was successful in forcing Marcos to step down and restoring democracy in the Philippines.

The Task Force Detainee of the Philippines (TFDP), one of FORUM-ASIA members in the Philippines, documented 101,538 human rights violation cases perpetrated by Ferdinand Marcos under his dictatorship regime.

“The Philippines was considered as one of the most democratic countries in the region since Filipino people ousted Ferdinand Marcos by non-violent resistance in 1986. We are deeply disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision and Rodrigo Duterte’s administration to honour the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos,” says John Samuel, Executive Director of FORUM-ASIA.

Read full article @www.forum-asia.org

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally
published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or
change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and
original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the
tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc

[From the web] Anti-Torture Coalition denounces Marcos burial like a “thief in the night”-UATC

Anti-Torture Coalition denounces Marcos burial like a “thief in the night”

uatc logoA network of civil society organizations which advocate for the eradication of torture and ill treatment in the Philippines has likened the  sudden manner of the burial of the late deposed  dictator Ferdinand Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani (LnmB) today as a “thief in the night.”

The United against Torture Coalition (UATC) said that the swiftness of the Marcos’s internment tend to belie the claim of the dictator’s family and their supporters that there is a popular support for the decision to bury him in the LnmB.

“Once again, the public was caught by surprise just like the time when the entire country was placed by Marcos under martial law. That kind of  stealth is characteristic of a thief who strikes in the dead of night when the victims are unaware,” the UATC spokesperson, Kaloy Anasarias, said.

Read full article @balayph.net

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally
published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or
change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and
original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the
tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc

[Press Release] Painted Women Performed Warrior Dance against Violence -WMW

Painted Women Performed Warrior Dance against Violence

photo-by-joseph-purugananTo mark the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, women with painted faces and bodies performed a warrior dance at noon today in Quezon City. Filling the streets around the World Scout Jamboree roundabout in Timog, the women denounced the violenceof the current administration, and the institutional violence that “kills” 14 women each day they are deprived of reproductive health services by the state.

According to the women, the Duterte administration’s violence include the drug-war killings, the killing of democracy through patronage of the Marcos burial at the heroes’ cemetery and sponsorship of the Marcos’s return to power, promotion of death penalty, criminalization of child delinquents, non-implementation of the Reproductive Health Law, and sexist attacks on women’s dignity.

“The spate of state-sanctioned killings exacerbated the trauma in women already reeling from impoverishment,” said Clarissa Militante, one of the leaders of World March of Women (WMW) and Focus on the Global South. Both groups are members of iDefend, a human rights network calling for a stop to the killings. According to iDefend, the number has reached over 5,000 and victimized are mostly poor families, leaving women widowed and children fatherless. Human rights groups are now overburdened with responding to psycho-social and legal needs of the families of survivors. “The encouragement of the killings by the President himself emboldened the police to directly take lives, as well as persecute women leaders who dare challenge this policy,” added Militante. She noted that the first human rights defender killed under the current administration is a woman environmental rights advocate, Gloria Capitan.

“The state’s facilitation of dictator Marcos’s burial similarly opened wounds in rape and torture victims among women, and those left behind by the disappeared during Martial Law,” according to Nilda Lagman-Sevilla, Co-Chair of the Familiies of Victims of Involuntary Disappearances (FIND). Ka NIlda’s brother, a human rights lawyer who vanished in 1977, is among the 882 desaparecidos under Martial Law. “President Duterte himself should account for this mistake, rectify it, and stop resuscitating a deposed authoritarian power,” she added.

Now, women are being abused online when identified to be protesting against the Marcos burial or critiquing the Duterte administration.  It should be remembered that WMW leaders charged the current President with violation of the Magna Carta of Women and promotion of rape culture. Now, the same sexism is being perpetrated by legislators against Senator Leila De Lima, as well as by Marcos and Duterte followers against protesters, according to Jean Enriquez of the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women (CATW-AP), WMW and iDefend. “Sexual harassment, sexist cyberbullying and rape cases brought to our attention rose in number with the coming to power of Duterte, bringing along Marcos with him,” said Enriquez.However, the women refuse to be cowed.

“We draw strength from our women ancestors who have resisted our subjugation as a people,” stated Nice Coronacion, leader of the youth section of the labour center SENTRO. “We cannot allow the resurgence of a terror state, and we are rising in defiance,” Coronacion added.

“The women vowed to fight for their rights to reproductive freedom, a life of dignity, and a safe and violence-free world for women and their families,” said Ana Maria Nemenzo of WomanHealth.

The women leaders underscored that the recent days after the Marcos burial at the Libingan ng mga Bayani showed that silence and spread of lies which marked the entry to power of Pres. Duterte and re-emergence of the Marcoses, is now being countered by intelligent and truthful narratives, calls for justice and reason from human rights defenders and coming especially from young people in protest actions.

Also leading the symbolic dance as “Pintadas” were women from the Center for Migrant Advocacy, Foundation for Media Alternatives, Lilak (Purple Action for Indigenous Women’s Rights), Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates (PAHRA), Pambansang Koalisyon ngKababaihan sa Kanayunan (PKKK), SARILAYA, WomanHealth, Women’s Legal and Human Rights Bureau (WLB), Idefend, Block Marcos, Coalition Against the Marcos Burial at LNMB (CAMB-LNMB), and individual women who heeded the call for the action online.

Those who were not able to come to the action painted their faces and posted selfies with hashtags #EndVAW, #WomenRising, #StopTheKillingsPh, #BlockMarcos and #Hukayin.

November 25, 2016
Contact Person:  Jean Enriquez 09778105326

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally
published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or
change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and
original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the
tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc

[Campaign] A CALL TO ACTION: BLOCK MARCOS!

A CALL TO ACTION: BLOCK MARCOS!

block-marcosPresident Rodrigo Duterte’s order to bury Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani—an order that has now been affirmed by the Supreme Court—is an attack on us all.

It is an attack on all of us who suffered from the dictatorship because it is a way of telling us: Your parents were murdered or you were tortured by a “hero,” now move on.

It is an attack on us all because it revises history, and denies the future generations of the truth, and of justice.

But it is also an attack on all of us because it is in effect a way of saying that dictatorship is “heroic” and, thus, a way of conditioning people into supporting dictatorship and Marcos’ return to power.

In the face of these attacks, we have a moral duty to fight back and refuse to “move on.”

This is why we, Filipinos from different walks of life, call for continuing protests to put pressure on the Supreme Court—and on President Duterte—to reverse their decision.

Should they refuse to heed our clamor, we call for a National Day of Protest on the day Marcos is to be buried.

In case Marcos is to be transported by land, we call for various kinds of direct actions to block his cortege every step of the way—from Batac to Taguig: for actions along the National Highway or NLEX; for anti-Marcos banners to be unfurled along EDSA; for ‘flash mobs’ at various intersections; and for other kinds of nonviolent disruptive actions

We call for large demonstrations by the gates of the Libingan ng mga Bayani.

Finally, we call for mass nonviolent civil disobedience actions before and on the day itself to block Marcos burial at the Libingan.

FOR MORE INFO
FB Page: Block Marcos
email: haranginangdiktadurya@gmail.com
phone: 09164996481

#BlockMarcos #NotoMarcosBurialLNMB

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally
published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or
change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and
original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the
tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc

[Press Release] Dakila Launches The Digital Museum of Martial Law in the Philippines www.MartialLaw.ph

Dakila Launches The Digital Museum of Martial Law in the Philippines
http://www.MartialLaw.ph

Dakila newOn September 21, 2016, 44 years after the signing of Proclamation No. 1081 that put the Philippines under Martial Law, Dakila, a group of artists working on human rights, launched the Digital Museum of Martial Law in the Philippines.

The Digital Museum of Martial Law in the Philippines is an immersive, critical, and creative platform for historical and cultural education. The museum is a virtual space serving as a living memorial to the Martial Law Era, accessible to Filipinos all over the world.

“It is crucial that Filipinos do not lose sight of this pivotal part of our history,”  says Micheline Rama, Museum Co-Director and Dakila’s Campaigns Director.

Dakila intends for the Museum to become a venue to provoke critical reflection, inclusive learning, and vigilant remembrance through the multi-faceted lens of artistic expression.

“We are aiming for the right balance between Internet memes and long chapters in textbooks,” Rama explains. “We cannot rely on only snippets of information that don’t have any context but we cannot also expect people to read through pages and pages of text. This is where art, creativity, and technology come in.”

Her Museum Co-Director agrees.  “You can explore the exhibits on the site as if it were an actual museum,” states Andrei Venal, who also serves as Dakila’s Creative Director, “Each exhibit is a curated journey using different multimedia elements to make history come alive.”

The Museum’s current exhibits includes “Isang Daan” (“One Hundred/One Road”), “an interactive timeline of 100 moments, mementos, and memories one the paths leading to Martial Law and the People Power Revolution” which features not only news clips, and personal accounts, but also economic data, public works, and even popular songs of the era.

The Museum is also host to as a special limited-time screening of Hector Baretto Calma’s award-winning short film, “Ang Mga Alingawngaw Sa Panahon Ng Pagpapasya” (“Echoes In the Midst of Indecision”) starring Alessandra de Rossi as the matriarch of a family torn apart by the social and political upheavals during the Martial Law Era.

The Museum has already lined up several upcoming exhibits. “ML: TL;DR”, curated by Michael Charleston “Xiao” Chua, is a multimedia primer on Martial Law, and “Sounds of Martial Law” curated by Ralph Eya.

Venal hopes that “whether you are a creative professional, writer, historian, academics or even just a passionate individual, you can submit to us your ideas for digital exhibitions on the topic of Martial Law, People Power, and Revolution. Schools, government bodies and other organizations are also very much welcome.”

Potential partners and collaborators may contact Dakila at at proposals@dakila.org.ph and submit their proposal with “DMMLPh Proposal” as the email subject line.

The Digital Museum of Martial Law in the Philippines is open to the public at http://www.MartialLaw.ph

DAKILA is a group of artists, students, and individuals committed to working together to creatively spark social consciousness formation towards social change.

Learn more at http://dakila.org.ph

Press Contact
Micheline Rama
dakila.media@gmail.com / katipon@dakila.org.ph
+63 915 178 0240

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally
published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or
change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and
original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the
tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc

[Statement] End the Killings. Uphold Human Rights. Defend Democracy -iDEFEND

photo-by-celia-lagman

Photo by Celia Lagman/FIND

End the Killings. Uphold Human Rights. Defend Democracy

1 copyToday is the International Day of Peace.

Development and peace go together, and this is why the United Nations sees as central to the achievement of sustainable development the drastic reduction of all forms of violence, the promotion of the rule of law, and equal access to justice for all.

This day is especially significant for our country since for the last three months, the country has been wracked by seeming government-sponsored violence and lawlessness, by a war the administration has declared, ostensibly against drugs but which has become a war against poor and marginalized Filipinos. Since the election of President Rodrigo Duterte, over 3000 people, practically all of them alleged drug users from the poor sector of Philippine society, have been subjected to extra-judicial execution either by the police or by vigilante groups.  While President Duterte’s subordinates invent ever more complex arguments to exonerate him, he  has made little attempt to conceal his preference for the extra-judicial execution of suspected drug dealers and users and his impatience with due process.  He has also enthusiastically given the green light to vigilantes to shoot pushers and users. And he has made it very clear that he does not believe in rehabilitation, which is the principal policy of all other governments towards users.

Not surprisingly, the president’s approach to the drug problem has earned him widespread notoriety internationally, to which he has responded by cursing his critics, including world leaders, and threatening to take the Philippines out of the United Nations.

While the police and vigilante groups go on a killing spree, his rabid followers intimidate those who stand for human rights and due process, branding them as protectors of drug lords.

Adding to the spreading sense of threat to basic rights among the citizenry is the president’s determination to bury the remains of dictator Ferdinand Marcos in the Libingan ng mga Bayani.  By enshrining the dead dictator as a hero, this move would legitimize his 14-year reign of terror, from 1972 to 1986, with its countless violations of human rights, political rights, and economic and social rights. It would constitute an airbrushing of history.

Democracy is under threat today.

Photo by PhilRights

Photo by PhilRights

In Sept. 4, the President has put the whole country under a State of Emergency due to lawless violence, indefinitely. Recently, we witnessed the most vivid manifestation of the failure of democracy being the Malacanang-directed ouster of Senator de Lima as head of the Justice Committee.  This is the latest move of  the Executive  to gain total control of Congress.  As for the president’s stance toward the Supreme Court, the whole country witnessed how he angrily threatened to declare martial law when the Court asserted its authority in the investigation of judges that Malacanang had linked to drugs.

Forty four years ago today, Marcos declared martial law.  Today, we face a similar  if not a greater threat to our lives, liberties, and democratic rights .  These rights, for which so many of our people fought and died for, are enshrined in our constitution.  We cannot allow anyone to take those rights away from us.

Thus, on this International Day of Peace, we demand that the Duterte administration put an end to extra-judicial killings. We demand that this administration:

·       respect human rights and due process,
·       refrain from subverting the separation of powers,
·       uphold democratic processes instead of curtailing them.

But above all, we call on our fellow citizens to join us in defense of our rights, our liberties, our democracy.  For as the old saying goes, “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is that good women and men should stand by and do nothing.”

(Statement of iDefend Coalition, Sept. 21, 2016)

https://web.facebook.com/notes/i-defend-human-rights-and-dignity-movement/end-the-killings-uphold-human-rights-defend-democracy/1743241059259130

[Statement] Marcos’ Crimes Will Never Be Forgotten -Balay

Marcos’ Crimes Will Never Be Forgotten

balayBalay stands alongside martial law victims and activists against the burial of the late president Ferdinand Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani (LnMB). The LnMB is a national shrine meant to pay tribute to those who sacrificed their lives and brought honor to our country. It is meant to be the final resting place of dignified soldiers, heroes and martyrs. The burial of Ferdinand Marcos will defeat the very essence of LnMB.

President Rodrigo Duterte had stated several times that he will allow Marcos’ burial at the LnMB. He said that Marcos deserves to be buried in the LnMB because he is a former president and a soldier. This was supported by the late dictator’s son Bongbong Marcos saying that the burial will heal the wounds of the past and bring closure to the long been divided nation.

But the premise here fundamentally is that presidents and soldiers have dedicated their lives in the service of the people which Marcos, especially at the height of his Martial Law and dictatorial regime – has not.

Balay believes that the burial will not bring closure but will only open the horror of the past. Marcos might have passed away years ago, but the injustices of his regime and the wounds that it has inflicted to the people are still there.

Balay was born in the height of Martial law. It has long been a witness to the injustices of the regime helping torture victims and political prisoners recover their lives from the trauma of the past. Balay had felt the pain and anguish of the families looking for their disappeared loved ones and not ever finding them again. Balay had stayed in communities were the crimes of the Marcos cronies in the 70’s and 80’s had violated women and children.

Ferdinand Marcos robbed the nation with its wealth. He betrayed and committed crime to the Filipino people he promised to protect. He used his power of authority against the people who elected him.

There can only be healing ang “moving on”, as Pres. Duterte and the Marcoses would also want to have it, if the family of the late dictator will concede that Marcos has indeed been responsible for atrocities, plunder, and suffering during his administration and apologize to the people. Also, their family must be willing to make amends by cooperating in the recovery of ill gotten wealth and in compensation of the victims of human rights violations.

But no amount of money can erase the trauma from the victims and their families during their brutal experience and suffering.

Marcos’ crimes will never be forgotten. It shall never be forgotten. Ferdinand Marcos does not deserve to be buried in the Libingan ng mga Bayani.

We call on to the President-elect Rodrigo Duterte to dismiss the idea of Ferdinand Marcos burial in LnMB.

Let us respect Marcos’ wish to be buried in his hometown in Ilocos next to her mother’s tomb. We believe that more than what the younger Marcos claims, this will be the ultimate closure for the victims and for the nation. Let us grant justice to those who died, sacrificed and fought for freedom in the dark eras of our nation’s history.

Never Forget. No to Marcos Burial at Libingan ng mga Bayani.

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally
published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or
change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and
original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the
tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc

[Blog] Five Reasons why Marcos should not be buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani By Darwin Mendiola

Five Reasons why Marcos should be buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani
By Darwin Mendiola

The commemoration of the 42nd anniversary of the Martial Law Declaration has once again revived the debate over whether former president Ferdinand Marcos should be buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani (Heroes’ Cemetery).

Darwin 2

Although, President Benigno Aquino III has made it clear that the late president would not be laid to rest at the national pantheon under his watch, Sen. Bongbong Marcos, the late president’s son still expressed optimism that PNoy would soon have a change of heart and would finally give his father a state burial.

For those who were lucky not to be born yet during the dictatorial regime of the late president might be puzzled on what this fuss is all about that is seemingly dividing the country once again.

Some who are fortunate to have lived to tell their stories of sufferings during Martial Law are firm in their stand to deny Marcos of a hero’s burial. Others who have had enough of political bickering are now calling for forgiveness and reconciliation in order for the country to move forward.

However, the controversy here lies not on the very act of burying the remains of the late president at the Libingan ng mga Bayani but to be or not to be considered a hero in the context of a possible state burial.
Let me just give you some logical thoughts on this issue. Here are the five reasons why Marcos should not be buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani:

#1 Republic Act No. 289 provides the main reason for the national pantheon as provided in its Section 1 which states that, “to perpetuate the memory of all the Presidents of the Philippines, national heroes and patriots for the inspiration and emulation of this generation and of generation still unborn.”

In short, it is reserved for those whom the nation honors for their service to the country. Marcos as a former President and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces is not automatically qualified for there is also a disqualification clause that says that any personnel who dishonorably separated/reverted/discharged from the service or who were convicted by final judgment of the offense involving moral turpitude will be unentitled to be interred in the national pantheon.

Considering this very intent of the law and given the historical facts of what had transpired during Martial Law and the way the late president and his first family were chased out of Malacanang and out of the country through People Power Revolution, Marcos would hardly consider a hero worth emulating and an inspiration to the Filipinos and to the next generation.

A hero’s burial for the former dictator is desecrating the memories of our Filipino Heroes.
Reference:
http://asianjournalusa.com/marcos-to-be-or-not-to-be-lnmb-p10455-168.htm

If this reason is not enough, we can go to the next one.

#2 Martial Law remains one of the darkest episodes in Philippine history. There were 3,257 victims of extra-judicial killings, 35,000 tortured, and 70,000 incarcerated under Marcos’ dictatorship.

In fact, Republic Act No. 10368 was recently passed by Philippine Congress as recognition for the heroism and sacrifices of all Filipinos who were victims of human rights violations under the Marcos regime.

Even long before that, 9,500 human rights victims who filed class suit against the Marcos already won $2 billion in damages in a Honolulu court which were affirmed by 2011 ruling by a United States Circuit Court in Hawaii.

A hero’s burial for the former dictator is an insult to the thousands of martial law victims.
Reference: http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/54a/062.html

If you are still unconvinced, let us now talk about the economy under the Marcos regime.

#3 The prosperity and progress under the Marcos regime is an illusion. In 1974, the poverty rate was 24%. By 1980 it was 40%. When Marcos assumed the presidency, the country’s foreign debt was US$1 billion. When Marcos fled to Hawaii, the country was heavily in debt with US$25 Billion. The bulk of these borrowed funds, according to sources had been stashed abroad.

Not only that the Marcoses and its associates were accused of plundering an estimated $10 billion from the Philippines, “Imeldific” is now synonymous to extravagant displays of wealth, sometimes to the point of vulgarity because of her lavish shopping trips to New York City with a huge entourage, spending millions on jewelry, clothes, and shoes.

It in noted that as of now, the Presidential Commission on Good Government had recovered 164 billion pesos (about $4 billion) since its creation, including a 150-carat ruby and a diamond tiara, hundreds of millions of dollars hidden in Swiss bank accounts and prime real estate in New York City.

A hero’s burial for the former dictator is a slap in the face of the millions of Filipinos who have suffered in grinding poverty while still paying for the debts of the Marcoses.
Reference:

If that is still not sufficient enough, let’s see if you really know our history.
# 4 Having Marcos buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani would mean rewriting our history. This will require revision of all history textbooks to glorify Marcos and depict the Martial Law as a peaceful and prosperous period in Philippine history.
It is not only a waste of public money but it will make our historians look like a bunch of fools. Filipinos are known to have short memories and are the most forgiving of people – a character that will always allow thieves, liars, scalawags and rascals to take advantage, but it does not mean we should stay ignorant and be naïve in allowing our history to be rewritten for some personal vested interests.
A hero’s burial for the former dictator is a shameless attempt to rewrite history.

Reference:
Rewriting History?

People, it would appear have very short memories and it is this which prompts me to write my blog this morning. It was Edmund Burke, a renowned Irish philosopher …
View on grantleishman.weebl…Preview by Yahoo

If you are still not convinced yet, you are either too slow to get it or you are just simply stupid to understand that this issue is merely a desperate attempt of the Marcoses to reclaim their political power.

#5 Declaring Marcos as a hero, would serve well not only the personal but also the political interest of his family. It will definitely exonerate them from their past crimes.

Senator Bongbong Marcos was quite open with his intention to run for President in 2016. He could very well project himself as THE SON OF A HERO as veteran journalist Ms. Raissa Robles put it in her blog.
That will also lift the burden to Mrs. Marcos for hiding her extravagance – of our money and will be entitled even with a pension as an elected government official as if she direly needed it. Noting that she is the second richest congressperson behind, of course, Manny Pacquiao.

A hero’s burial for the former dictator is a mockery to the intelligence of the Filipino electorate.
Reference:
http://raissarobles.com/2011/04/13/why-the-marcoses-want-ferdinand-buried-a-hero/

I can still give more reasons why Marcos should not be buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani. But it will be a waste of my time if the one reading this post is not smart enough to understand it. Just remember what Edmund Burke once said,

“Those who ignore history are bound to repeat it.”

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Statement] New Compensation Law (RA10368) for victims of human rights violations: right step but not enough to end Marcos impunity -PAHRA

PAHRA STATEMENT:

NEW COMPENSATION LAW, (Republic Act 10368)
FOR VICTIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS:
RIGHT STEP BUT NOT ENOUGH TO END
MARCOS IMPUNITY

pahra logo copyOn January 23, 1977, the newspaper Bulletin Today bannered this headline: “One-sided press reports scored. No violations of human rights – FM”.

Ferdinand Marcos was then vehemently denying the reports of massive and grave human rights violations perpetrated since his seizing a second term presidency by imposing martial law on September 21, 1972. Mainly documented by the Task Force Detainees of the Philippines (TFDP), established by the Association of Religious Superiors in the Philippines (AMRSP) in 1974, these violations reached the international community and the then U.N. Commission on Human Rights. Marcos used the State machinery to produce a coercive environment and to engender a culture of impunity that persist till the present.

After seven and twenty years since the downfall of the Marcos dictatorship, there is finally a law which acknowledges the long-known truth held by people that there were human rights violations, such as arbitrary and illegal arrests, extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances and torture, committed by the martial law regime. It is only correct and just to recognize and memorialize all the heroes and martyrs who fought against repression and who courageously struggled for human and people’s rights.

Signing into law the Bill which compensates the victims of human rights violations during the martial law period is the right step towards ending the Marcos impunity and obtaining both justice and healing.
PAHRA commends both Congress and the Administration of President Benigno S. Aquino III for this legislative act that shatters a Marcosian myth and propaganda that there were no human rights

PAHRA, nonetheless, believes and stands that while the law gives recognition and compensation to the victims of human rights violations, it is not enough to break through and to end the impunity unleashed by Marcos. The U.N. Updated Principles in Combating Impunity enumerate some State obligations still need to be complied with:

The Right to Truth – wherein it ensures the individual’s, as well as, the victim’s families and relatives right to know the circumstances and reasons for the victim’s torture, enforced disappearance or extrajudicial killing. For this end, Benigno S. Aquino III, as Chief Executive and Commander-in-Chief, should order all services of the security forces to de-classify all reports and data related to the martial law period. We recommend strongly here the passage into law of the right to information. The Office of the President should also institutionalize or calendar the President’s public paying of respects to the heroes and martyrs who fought the imposition of martial law and its adverse effects on human rights.

The Right to Justice –means bringing the perpetrators of violations to account – whether in criminal, civil, administrative or disciplinary proceedings – since they are not subject to any inquiry that might lead to their being accused, arrested, tried and, if found guilty, sentenced to appropriate penalties, and to making reparations to their victims.

There will be no closure to the wounds caused by the martial law period if there is no justice.

The State obligations to institute reforms to ensure the non-recurrence of these violations include the passage of legislation criminalizing extra-judicial killings and responding to the plight of internally displaced persons (IDPs). This also means the establishment and operationalization of national monitoring mechanisms.

EDSA people power ended Ferdinand E. Marcos’ one-man, martial law rule but has not completely dealt with and eliminated impunity.

PAHRA calls on and will join all people of good-will to determinedly combat impunity.

Iboto ang iyong #HRPinduterosChoice para sa HR NETWORKS POST.

Ang botohan ay magsisimula ngayon hanggang sa 11:59 ng Nov 15, 2013.

Ikaw para kanino ka pipindot? Simple lang bumoto:
• i-LIKE ang thumbnail/s ng iyong mga ibinoboto sa HRonlinePH facebook, i-share at
ikampanya.
• Bisitahin ang post sa HRonlinePH.com (links sa bawat thumbnail) at pindutin ang button sa
poll sa ilalim ng bawat nominadong post.
• Most number of the combined likes sa FB at sa poll buttons ang magiging 3rd HR Pinduteros
Choice na kikilalanin sa 2013 HR week celebration.

Makiisa sa pagpapalaganap ng impormasyon hinggil sa karapatang pantao. Pindot na!

WHAT IS 3RD HR PINDUTEROS CHOICE AWARDS? https://hronlineph.com/2013/10/01/3rd-human-rights-
pinduteros-choice-awards/

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[In the news] Marcos victims bill mired in debate -INQUIRER.net

Marcos victims bill mired in debate.
By Leila B. Salaverria, Philippine Daily Inquirer
January 14, 2013

inquirerLawmakers crafting the final bicameral version of a bill granting compensation to victims of human rights violations during martial law are debating whether or not to automatically recognize a certain group of claimants for indemnification or to open the fund to all claimants.

Despite this snag, however, they remained optimistic a final version of the measure would be ready for ratification by the Senate and House of Representatives when both houses resume sessions on Jan. 21.

The first bicameral conference committee meeting was held last week and another is scheduled for Wednesday.

The compensation bill seeks to provide tax-free remuneration to victims of human rights violations or their relatives during the dictatorship of the late President Ferdinand Marcos. The funds would be taken from the Marcoses’ ill-gotten wealth that Swiss authorities have returned to the Philippines and which stands at about P10 billion.

Read full article @newsinfo.inquirer.net

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[In the news] PNoy wants ‘further study’ on proposed PCGG abolition -InterAksyon.com

PNoy wants ‘further study’ on proposed PCGG abolition
By Philippine News Agency
January 3, 2013

InterAksyon logo2MANILA, Philippines — President Benigno Aquino III has tasked the Office of the President (OP) to study the proposed abolition of the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG).

Presidential Spokesman Edwin Lacierda, in a press briefing on Thursday, confirmed a meeting was conducted on the proposal, “but the President wanted further study.”

“The OP is still studying that particular recommendation. The President tasked OP to study that particular recommendation and so there are a number of details that need to be vetted,” he said.

Lacierda, however, stressed that the government is bent on pursuing the ill-gotten wealth cases of the Marcoses — assuming that Congress would abolish the PCGG.

“Just to make it clear, the pursuit of ill-gotten wealth will continue even if the recommendation will be acted upon by the President,” he said.

Read full article @interaksyon.com

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[In the news] Rights victims angry at end to Marcos wealth hunt -ABS-CBNnews.com

Rights victims angry at end to Marcos wealth hunt
Agence France-Presse
January 2, 2013

ABS-CBN_News_&_Current_Affairs.pngMANILA – Philippine torture victims under the 20-year regime of Ferdinand Marcos vented their anger Wednesday at a reported government plan to wind down its hunt for the late dictator’s embezzled billions.

The proposal, now under consideration by President Benigno Aquino, would give the signal that people in power can commit crimes with impunity, said the group which calls itself Selda, the local word for a prison cell.

“We cannot just forgive and forget what the Marcoses did to us, nor must the Aquino government stop pursuing justice for martial law victims and the rest of the Filipinos,” the group said in a statement.

The Presidential Commission on Good Government, the agency tasked with recovering the Marcos wealth, said last month that it would soon wind down its operations after almost 30 years.

Read full article @ www.abs-cbnnews.com

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Statement] Birds of the same feather… -KPD

BIRDS OF THE SAME FEATHER…

by KPD

The crowd that attended the book launch of “Juan Ponce Enrile: A Memoir” last October 4, 2012 at the Manila Peninsula were people who have lived in the corridors of power and immensely benefited from the system. As one newspaper reported, “the invitation of Enrile brought together an odd assortment of colorful characters whose careers and personalities have crossed, intersected and clashed on the very public state of Philippine politics”.

Surprisingly, the book launching was also attended by a section of the ruling class that were victims of martial law. The caption “No permanent friends, only permanent interests” with the picture of the launching hugged the headlines, hitting the nail on the head. Let bygones be bygones. The ruling class can live with each other and even forgive one another.

Their overwhelming concern is that the system continually serve their interests and reap benefits for them while the reins of political power shift from one faction to another via an election. Aberrations like the Marcos dictatorship, the revolutionary government of Cory Aquino and the illegitimate rule of Gloria Arroyo are testimonies of the fractiousness of the ruling class on one hand and how their contradictions are being resolved momentarily on the other hand. Those who lose out at any point can always worm back into the seat of political power. The most important thing is that the well-entrenched power remains with them.

Beyond the book launching, the attendance also conclusively reflects the entire ruling class’ support for PNoy’s institutionalization of reforms in the system, making the system more subservient to foreign capital and more misery on people’s lives. Their current unity is best expressed in the claim of the parties out of power that they are not the opposition to PNoy’s administration. In fact, some political parties have coalesced with the ruling Liberal Party in the coming election.

The timing of the book launch of Enrile is revealing. It comes at a time that Enrile enjoys high popularity rating after the Senate impeachment of Corona and a week after the country commemorated the 40th anniversary of martial law. Afterwards, on daily basis, the contents of the memoir are daily being dished out in the newspapers.

There is more than meets the eye. The event reiterates an established fact – that victors always write the history. The crowd at the book launching which was practically an array of the ruling class became a fait accompli in rewriting the real pages of the martial law period.

Looking back, the Marcos dictatorship was not an isolated case. It was part of a period where the US installed and supported dictators within and among its client states – Somoza in Nicaragua, Suharto in Indonesia to name a few. Granting that the “martial law blueprint was spelled out during Marcos inaugural speech on December 30, 1965”, it still needed the go signal and tacit support from the US to declare and implement the martial law.

Enrile “who has held power at its apex for 46 years” was never for people’s democracy. Until now, Enrile is still a rabid apologist for martial law and authoritarianism that resulted in the incarceration of more than 70,000 people, 34,000 tortured, 3,240 killed and 1,000 disappeared. If the plot to oust Marcos had been successful in the first quarter of 1986, they would then install a civilian military junta.

In his last month’s skirmish with Trillanes, he arrogantly announced that as a Senate president, he is answerable to no one.

And still, Enrile had the gall to “re-engineer himself” as the humane face of the dictatorship and in the process portray himself as a hero. In his twilight years, the memoir is Enrile’s serious attempt to carve his lasting positive legacy on the history of the nation. Part of this is sanitizing, nay cosmetizing his role during martial law.

Recently, he claimed that his ambush on that “one fateful night in September 1972” was for real and its staging was not needed to justify the imposition of martial law. This was long after his admission to the public last February 22, 1986 that the ambush was fake.

What version now to believe? The circumstances of the contradictory claims were different. February, 1986 found Enrile among those who holed in Camp Aguinaldo and was under threat of being attacked by the pro-Marcos forces. Yes, it was an admission of a man unsure to live another day. It was like an admission of a dying man.

The reconstruction of stories and tales are also curios . Acts, events, and statements are attributed to individuals that are already dead like Marcos, Ver and even Ninoy Aquino. These people could not tell their own tales to contradict Enrile. For dead men could not tell their own stories.

Why should Enrile wait for the launching of his memoir to peddle these stories? Immediately, after his “transformation” last February, 1986 by admitting that the ambush was fake, he could have made restitutions by spelling out the whole truth about martial law. Then, it would stand scrutiny because the key players then of martial law were still alive. He never did.

Enrile is one of the best and proven defenders of the status quo for almost 50 years. Let us read the book for what its worth – one of the best exposition on how the ruling class writes their own version of distorted history.

Others will also try to write their own version of history. But we know for a fact that it is solely the people who make real history. And with the people, let us write and build our own history. For, it is in righting the wrongs of history that we avoid the condemnation to repeat the horrors of the past.
Kilusan Para sa Pambansang Demokrasya (KPD)
October 1, 2012

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[In the news] Greener on the other side: Deforestation in the wake of Martial Law -GMANews.com

Greener on the other side: Deforestation in the wake of Martial Law
by Shaira Panela,  GMA NEWS

September 21, 2012

Philippine forests were lush before Pres. Ferdinand Marcos declared Martial Law on Sept. 21, 1972.

Forty years after, Philippine forests are still under repair from denudation caused by massive deforestation that started in the Marcos regime:

(See graph @ http://www.gmanetwork.com)
Forest cover is improving, but it still has a long way to go.
Source: Forest Management Bureau

“Alam mo, at that time (1960s to 1974), ang forest cover natin ay even more than 50 percent. Akala natin yung forest resources natin hindi mauubos e…,” said the Department of Environment and Natural Resources‘ Forest Management Bureau (FMB) director Ricardo Calderon in an interview with GMA News Online.

But the country saw rapid deforestation after Martial Law as Marcos changed the rules on logging leases, from one year to 10-year and even 25-year terms, according to the book “The Political Economy of Growth and Impoverishment in the Marcos Era” by James K. Boyce.

Read full article @ www.gmanetwork.com

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[In the news] A family’s—and nation’s—story -INQUIRER.net

A family’s—and nation’s—story.

By Rina Jimenez-David
Philippine Daily Inquirer
April 23, 2012

I think it’s valid to say that not one among us in the graduating class of Maryknoll College High School 1972 would have thought that our classmate, Cristina Pargas, would end up eventually joining the New People’s Army, losing her husband who was an NPA commander, and then taking up the vocation of teaching and advocating for teachers’ rights.

I remember her as a slight bespectacled girl with unexpected reserves of humor that surfaced at the oddest times. Because she was usually quiet, she belonged to the category of “good” girls, as opposed to “bad” or “semi-bad” girls who were often scolded for wearing skirts that were too short (made even shorter after classes by the simple expedient of folding them at the waist), for smoking in the stairwells, and sassing our teachers.

Only when I was asked to edit the nominations for Tina and another classmate, Nanan Jacinto, for the Amazing Alumna Achievers Award did I get to know what happened to Tina in the years after we left our idyllic campus along Katipunan Avenue. And even then, it turns out, it wasn’t even the full story, for Tina kept a lot of crucial details to herself.

Now those details are out in public, forming part of the book “Subversive Lives: A Family Memoir of the Marcos Years.” For one thing, I finally found out the identity of her slain first husband. He was Ishmael “Jun” Quimpo Jr., whom she met while they were student activists at UP.

Jun’s (and Tina’s) story is part of the “family memoir” of the Quimpos, who paid an extraordinary price in the struggle for freedom during the Marcos and immediate post-Marcos years. Even at a time that called for enormous sacrifices from all Filipino families, the Quimpos it seems were singled out for special punishment—or honor, if you choose to view their fate that way.

Read full article @ opinion.inquirer.net

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

« Older Entries