Tag Archives: HumanRights

[Video] #SanaAllDapatAll Pantay at Patas | #WokeDTalk2021 Episode 1

#HumanRights #IntlWomensDay2021

WELCOME PO SA WOKE D’ TALK 2021 EPISODE 1Ang title po ng Episode natin ay #SanaAllDapatAll​ PANTAY AT PATASAng mga topic po ng usapan ay iinog sa usaping Diskriminasyon at ang International Women’s DayAng Episode po na ito ay LIVE-STREAMED nitong March 6.

Ka-Talk at ka-game po natin si Atty. Virgie Suarez Pinlac ng KAISA-KA Follow and like KAISA KA sa FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/KAISAKA​

—-WOKE THE TALK is a LIVE game and talk show for the youth. To be Live-streamed, 4pm to 5pm, trice a Month. Fun, interactive and informative discussion LIVE streamed on Facebook and will be cross-posted to other Facebook pages of TFDP’s network. Showcasing the talents of the youth while discussing human rights basic concepts and current events through different interactive segments.

—Pls like us at:

Youth for Rights (Y4R) FB Page: https://www.facebook.com/Y4Rofficial​

lIKE AND FOLLOW TFDPonline:
TFDP FB Page: https://www.facebook.com/TaskForceDet…​
SAYRI KO FB Page: https://www.facebook.com/sayriko10520​
PULSO SA KATAWHAN KATUNGOD FB Page: https://www.facebook.com/PulsoSaTawha…​

Twitter: @TFDPonline

Instagram: @TFDPonline

Youtbe Channel: TFDP online

Submit your contribution online through HRonlinePH@gmail.com
Include your full name, e-mail address, and contact number.

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos, etc.

[Statement] Philippine Movement for Climate Justice to Philippine Government: Declare a Climate Emergency Now!

#HumanRights #ClimateEmergency Philippine Movement for Climate Justice to Philippine Government: Declare a Climate Emergency Now!

With just mere days in between, the Philippines was struck by several strong typhoons–Typhoon Molave (Typhoon Quinta), Typhoon Goni (Typhoon Rolly), dubbed as “the strongest typhoon of 2020,” and Typhoon Vamco (Typhoon Ulysses). Together with Typhoons Siony and Tonyo, the series of five typhoons has been unprecedented as devastations already covered six regions in the whole island of Luzon. The scope and coverage are almost equal to Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan) in 2013.

Sixteen people have died in the devastation following Rolly, and 37 people have died in the floods and heavy winds carried by Ulysses–both storms affecting almost millions of families, communities. Just in Bataan alone, a whopping 89 million pesos worth of damages for agriculture and 24 schools rendered unusable. While data has still to be aggregated for these 4th quarter typhoons – data for the two typhoons, Rolly and Ulysses already have a combined Php 19.2 Billion of damages in agriculture and Infrastructures as of November 14. In its aftermath, Typhoon Ulysses has sunk the provinces of Isabela and Cagayan, as residents are bracing for more floods when massive water will be released from Magat Dam.

These scales of destruction and deaths could have been avoided knowing the Philippine record and experiences with strong typhoons and climate impacts. However, the Philippine government never learns from the past as scales of destruction and deaths have never been avoided or minimized. As strong weather events have battered the country, typhoons are not only the killers but also flooding and landslide, which accompany them. Destruction and death would not have been worse if the government’s readiness is at the scale of the understanding of the science of climate impacts and its seriousness in the protection of watersheds, ecological recovery of river basins, and the termination of all destructive activities. Mining, quarrying, property development in protected watershed areas, and constructing large dams destroy the watersheds’ ecological purpose. The flooding of Marikina, Isabela, Cagayan, and the towns of Infanta and Nakar in Quezon province are prime examples of the continuing policy mistakes the government refuses to rectify. While it is not yet late, the government must stop its plan to construct the Centennial Kaliwa Dam Project and all other major dams in the pipeline.

For years, the Philippine Movement for Climate Justice has been calling for the government to declare a climate emergency and has repeatedly warned about the impacts of the climate crisis. Still, these have never get traction within the Duterte Administration. The senseless neglect of the calls for urgent climate action in the governance finds the Duterte Government itself in a cyclical pattern of abandonment of its obligation, which ultimately points to the denial of climate deaths and destruction worldwide and dismissive of science.

With two remaining years of its administration, PMCJ challenges President Duterte to place climate action at the center of its government’s policy by declaring a climate emergency, allocate funds for adaptation, address past climate impacts, and lead and prepare the Filipino people in building safe, sustainable, resilient communities. PMCJ likewise demands accountability on the Duterte administration for its failure to prepare and anticipate these impacts as these are already qualified and known and for putting the lives of the people at risk. It is about time that the people demand justiciability not just for those governments responsible for global warming but also for the Philippine government’s failure to address past and current impacts and prepare the country for the climate crisis.

DeclareClimateEmergency

ClimateJusticeNow!

Source: facebook.com/ClimateJusticePH/

Submit your contribution online through HRonlinePH@gmail.com
Include your full name, e-mail address, and contact number.

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos, etc.

[Statement] Indigenous Women Speak out: Anti-Terrorism Act is a direct threat to us as rights defenders -LILAK

Indigenous Women Speak out: Anti-Terrorism Act is a direct threat to us as rights defenders
7 August 2020

Indigenous women speak out and stood up against the Anti-Terror Act. They filed a petition before the Supreme Court questioning the constitutionality of Republic Act 11479.

Surmounting the challenges and difficulties of fulfilling technical legal requirements, Teresa dela Cruz, an Aeta Abelen from Zambales, and Nora Sukal, a B’laan woman from Tampakan, South Cotabato, are two of the petitioners of the IP-MORO petition led by the Atty. Tony La Vina and Atty. Efrenita Taqueban as co-counsels. Other petitioners are leaders, mostly women, of indigenous communities from Cordillera and Mindanao, as well as from the Moro communities of BARMM. LILAK (Purple Action for Indigenous Women’s Rights), a collective of feminists and women activists advocating for the rights and empowerment of indigenous women, is also one of the petitioners. This comes two days before the celebration of the International Day of Indigenous Peoples (Aug. 9).

In a time of pandemic, the Duterte government railroaded a bill that would neither combat COVID-19 nor better the situations of many Filipinos suffering from the pandemic. The year 2020 has seen worsening poverty, unemployment, and hunger while Duterte strengthens the military and police to battle against what it considers terrorism – the growing anger, disgruntlement and resistance to its violent, corrupt, anti-people governance.

The vague definitions of terrorist and terrorist act in ATA endanger indigenous peoples who, for years, have been threatened, harassed, terrorized and red-tagged as they assert their rights to their ancestral lands. Even before the introduction of the Anti-Terrorism Bill, the Duterte government has accused indigenous leaders – who are defenders of the environment and natural resources – of being enemies of the state.

According to the UN Human Rights Office, 248 activists were killed from 2015 to 2019, Global Witness tagged the Philippines the most dangerous country for environment and lands rights defenders. They counted 133 killings during Duterte’s presidency; 46% of the cases are believed to have been perpetrated by the Armed Forces of the Philippines; 44% occurred in Mindanao; and 22% of the victims were indigenous people. A large percentage of the killings were related to land-grabbing of agribusinesses, plantations, and mining companies and state-sponsored development projects such as mega dams and power plants. These are from killings which were reported. There are more acts of violence and killings within their ancestral domains which are not officially documented and reported.

Teresa and Nora are indigenous women who are in the frontlines of their communities’ struggle against large scale mining within their ancestral domains, and land grabbing. They themselves are victims of different forms of harassment and threats; and they fear that they are the targets of the law. According to Teresa, “Kami na mga naninirahan sa bundok, at doon nagtatanggol ng aming karapatan para mabuhay, ay nangangamba na kami ay matuturing na terorista. Dahil sa ilalim ng pamahalaang ito, ang sino man ang di payag o di sang-ayon sa kanilang gawain ay tinuturing na kaaway (We who live in the mountains, where we fight for our rights to live, are afraid that we will be considered terrorists. Because under this administration, whoever is against of their actions are considered enemies)”.

The ATA is an obvious weaponization of the law aimed to silence dissent. It is a violation of human rights and a mockery of the Philippines’ legal systems. The Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC) that has the power to permit arrests, surpassing the power of the judiciary, will consist of presidential appointees, Duterte’s loyal “yes men”.

LILAK will continue to support indigenous women and their struggles, as we join hands, and link arms in our collective defense and assertion of our rights against Duterte’s fascism, impunity, and misogyny.

For more information please contact,
judy pasimio – 09175268341 | judy104@lilak.net
Shar Balagtas – 09771966122 | sharbalagtas.lilak@gmail.com

Submit your contribution online through HRonlinePH@gmail.com
Include your full name, e-mail address, and contact number.

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos, etc

[Press Release] Militant Labor scoffs at “Good Job” self-rating by Congress and Senate -BMP

Militant Labor scoffs at “Good Job” self-rating by Congress and Senate

“A cruel and sick joke on taxpayers,” this was the reaction of a militant labor group to statements by the House of Representatives and the Senate today that praised both chambers for the “good work done in the past year”. Speaker Feliciano Belmonte and Senate president Drilon issued virtually the same statements as the legislative adjourned for its Christmas break.

bmplogo

Gie Relova, Bukluran ng Manggagawang Pilipino (BMP) spokesperson said, “Our legislators have outdone themselves. They still have the gall to praise themselves for a job well done even if the legislative, especially Congress, always scores the lowest rating in surveys. To the Filipino public, the Congress and the Senate – commonly parodied as a pigsty – are the most untrustworthy institutions of the bureaucracy”.

Accomplishments in 2014 according to Rep. Belmonte and Sen. Drilon

The Speaker cited the P2.6 trillion national budget for 2015, and the P22.4 billion supplemental budget for 2014, the full entry of foreign banks, promoting job generation and providing for mandatory health insurance coverage for all senior citizens as among the lawmakers’ accomplishments.

Meanwhile, the Senate president cited the nine percent improved approval ratings of the Senate from a mere thirty-three percent in June as a basis of its accomplishments. Among the Senate’s bragging rights include the Iskolar ng Bayan Act and the Open Distance Learning Act.

Pork still in 2015 Budget

“Sorry, but we won’t buy it”, says Relova. He added, “Pork remains in the 2015 budget. Our lawmakers are patting each others’ backs for cleverly hiding the nefarious Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF), which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 2013″.

The labor leader explained, the 2015 budget may appear to have abolished lump sum and discretionary for each legislator. But a further examination of allocations for departments and line agencies would reveal that each legislator has inserted projects and programs for their respective districts, not in the genuine interests of their constituents but to strengthen the patronage of their political dynasties”.

Congress and Senate represent Big Business, not the People

“The full liberalization of the banking industry, without amending the Charter, is contrary to the protection of the Filipino economy against foreign interests. The entry of large multinational banks, which are larger than all the existing local banks combined, would force the mass layoffs and retrenchment in the banking industry,” Relova explained.

Pro-People, Pro-Labor Reform

“If both Congress and the Senate truly represents the will of a people now disgusted over the pork barrel, the lack of transparency in government and in the budgetary processes, they should have urgently passed political reforms such as the FOI (freedom of infomation) bill and the anti-dynasty bill,” he expounded.

“Proposed measures such as these (FOI and anti-dynasty bills) could be found at the backburners of various House and Senate Committees, with our legislators literally ‘sitting on their asses’ to delay the legislative processes,” Relova stressed.

The labor leader concluded, “Aside from political reforms, workers are also demanding the immediate passage of reforms to protect the Constitutional rights of labor. We have every right and reason in their demands for a living wage and for security of tenure, not only because such rights are mandated by the highest law of the land. More so, our legislators and their retinues must realize that their salaries, perks and allowances came from the collective toil of millions, whose starvation wages are still slashed with withholding tax deductions and indirect taxation.

Press Release
19 December 2014
Reference: Gie Relova 0915-2862555
Bukluran ng Manggagawang Pilipino

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Resources/Campaign] What is torture?

 

“In 1987, the Convention against #Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment came into force. It was an important step in the much-needed process of globalising #humanrights and acknowledging that torture, and all forms of inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, are absolutely and universally illegal. In 1997, the United Nations General Assembly decided to mark this historic date and designated 26 June each year as International Day in Support of Victims of Torture.”
torture copy

 

[Press Release] Groups accuse MMDC of new violations -ATM

Groups accuse MMDC of new violations

Anti-mining Coalition in Cantilan, Nagpakabana Na CarCanMadCarLanon (NNC), once again declared battle against MarcVentures Mining Development Corporations (MMDC) for the company’s alleged violation of the Mines and Geosciences Bureau’s (MGB) stoppage order issued on April 22, 2014.

atm-logo

According to NNC, MMDC has been doing full mining operations in Cabangahan, Cantilan, Surigao del Sur since May 12 despite the stoppage order.

In a letter to MGB Director Leo Jasareno, NNC condemns MMDC’s operations, pointing out that the company violated the stoppage order which states that MMDC is only allowed to do remediation activity in Cantilan, and not extraction and disposition of mineral ores.

NNC’s letter to MGB also requests for MMDC’s Mineral Production Sharing Agreement (MPSA) to be cancelled for the ‘serious violations’ it allegedly committed.

The claim was supported by photos and videos that show an array of heavy equipment including backhoes and dump trucks in the mine site and remains of bulldozed trees in the head waters of Carac-an Watershed Forest Reserves.

Chito Trillanes, Spokesperson of Vicariate Social Action Center(VSAC) said that “MMDC is clearly using the remediation activity as a front to their illegal mining activities.

He also added that, aside from this violation, “MMDC is also defying the Temporary Environmental Protection Order (TEPO) issued by the Regional Trial Court (RTC) in Cantilan that prohibits them to perform mining operations in the Watershed Forest Reserves in Cantilan, Carrascal and Madrid.”

On a follow up communication, Trillanes called MGB Caraga Officer-In-Charge, ENGR. NOLI N. ARREZA, to bring to his attention these alleged illegal extraction activities performed by MMDC. Engr. Arreza told him that they already called the resident manager of MMDC who denied the accusations.

“MMDC can not deny their violations. We have proof that they are violating the stoppage order MGB issued. Said Emma Y. Hotchkiss, NNC Chairperson.

Hotchkiss asserted, “We demand the urgent issuance by MGB of a cease and desist order against MMDC with a directive to immediately stop its activities and to remove all its equipments from the mine site in Cabangahan, Cantilan, Surigao del Sur.”

 

Meanwhile, Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM), a partner organization of NNC expressed its full support on the group’s actions against MMDC.
“If MMDC thinks they can get away with this, they have never been more wrong. We are ready to take every possible legal step to make sure that justice will be served.” said Jaybee Garganera, ATM National Coordinator.

###

Nagpakabana Na CarCanMad CarLanon (NNC) is an alliance of different sectoral groups and civil society organizations dedicated to protecting the environment in Surigao del Sur. Baywatch Foundation and CARCANMADCARLANPAR Social Action Center (VSAC) are members of the coalition.

Alyansa Tigil Mina is an alliance of mining-affected communities and their support groups of NGOs/POs and other civil society organizations who are opposing the aggressive promotion of large-scale mining in the Philippines. The alliance is currently pushing for a moratorium on mining, revocation of Executive Order 270-A, repeal of the Mining Act of 1995 and passage of the AMMB.

For more information:

Emma Hotchkiss, Baywatch Foundation Chairperson, 09054935061 <emma.hotchkiss@gmail.com>
Chito Trillanes, Vicariate of CARCANMADCARLANPAR Social Action Center Spokesperson, (0919) 962. 5131 <chitotrillanes@yahoo.com.ph>
Jaybee Garganera, ATM National Coordinator, (0917) 549.82.18 <nc@alyansatigilmina.net>
Check Zabala, ATM Media and Communications Officer, (0927) 623.50.66 <checkzab@gmail.com>

ATM Press Release
June 7, 2014

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Statement] CSO Recommendations for the ASEAN Secretary-General and the ASEAN Secretariat

The 2013 Dialogue between the ASEAN Secretary-General, the ASEAN Secretariat and the Representative of Civil Society Organizations

Regional CSOs. File photo by Forum-Asia

Regional CSOs. File photo by Forum-Asia

Note: Based from the information shared by our source…

On Friday, 1 November 2013, in Jakarta, Representatives of Civil Society Organizations (Including the source, a representative of FORUM-ASIA) attended the 2013 Dialogue between the ASEAN Secretary-General, the ASEAN Secretariat and Civil Society Organizations.

The meeting was organized by HRWG (Human Rights Working Group), CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies), and Indonesia Representative to the AICHR.
In the meeting CSOs presented the statement to the ASG and ASEAN Secretariat, which was drafted during CSO meeting on 31 October 201.

According to the source, Ambassador Le Luong Minh (the ASG) gave speech in the meeting but unfortunately, there was no question and answer due to other agenda of the ASG and the scheduled flight to Tokyo at the same day.

In the afternoon, there was a dialogue with ASEAN Secretariat, represented by H.E. Dr. AKP Mochtan (Deputy Secretary General (DSG) of ASEAN for Community and Corporate Affairs Department) and Ms. Leena Ghosh (Assistant Director on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights).

Civil Society’s Recommendations for the ASEAN Secretary-General and the ASEAN Secretariat, submitted in Jakarta, Indonesia on 1 November 2013

1. We, civil society organizations, peoples’ organizations, think tank, and young people from Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao P.D.R., Malaysia, Myanmar,the the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam, have gathered in Jakarta, Indonesia for the 2013 Dialogue between the ASEAN Secretary-General, the ASEAN Secretariat and the Representative of Civil Society Organizations, organized by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) and the Human Rights Working Group (HRWG) on 31 October – 1 November 2013, to provide feedback and recommendations to the ASEAN Secretary-General and the ASEAN Secretariat to further improve the involvement of civil society in building an ASEAN Community and strengthen the efforts to promote and protect human rights in the region.

ASEAN-Logo

ASEAN Community and Human Rights

2. We recognize that ASEAN is currently pursuing its goal of building an ASEAN Community by 2015. We are, however, alarmed that human rights is not mainstreamed in the three ASEAN Community Blueprints. We are concerned that there has been no synergy displayed among the three ASEAN Community Pillars that further negatively impacts on the rights of the ASEAN people.

3. We would like to call for renewed efforts in addressing our pressing concerns regarding the political,economic, social development and environmental degradation in the region. We are united over these concerns and their implications towards the fulfilment of social justice and our rights. Urgent to our agenda are labor migrant issues and free trade; trafficking in persons, particularly women and children; rampant discrimination against persons with disabilities, ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples as well as person with different sexual orientations and gender identities; continuing disregard for refugees, political prisoners, and other marginalized groups.

4. We support a general call for access to justice as a framework and tool of ASEAN toward social justice to guarantee effective resolutions of injustices committed against the poor and the powerless.

5. We urge the ASEAN Secretary-General to encourage member states to adopt and ratify international human rights conventions.

6. We stress our view that it is our right to monitor the implementation of ASEAN agreements. To this end, we call for the guarantee of the freedom of expression and the right to information in ASEAN.

7. We also encourage the ASEAN Secretary-General to initiate discussions amongst stakeholders on the establisment of an ASEAN Human Rights Court.

8. We reiterate our recognition of the role of the ASEAN Secretary-General as well as the ASEAN Secretariat as important channels for civil society to hold ASEAN Member States accountable to their international and regional obligations to promote, protect and fulfill human rights as enshrined in the ASEAN Charter.

Civil Society Engagement

9. We appreciate the commitment shown by the ASEAN Secretary-General and the ASEAN Secretariat to continue the engagement with civil society in the region. Considering that establishing a culture of dialogue in ASEAN as a prerequisite to building an ASEAN Community, we urge, ASEAN Secretary-General to institutionalize the engagement with civil society, with the involvement of the ASEAN Secretariat, such as this meeting, to be annually organized.

10. We are concerned that there has been no institutionalized access for civil society to engage ASEAN at all levels, despite one of the principles of ASEAN “[t]o promote a people-oriented ASEAN in which all sectors of society are encouraged to participate in, and benefit from, the process of ASEAN integration and community building”.

11. We urge the ASEAN Secretary-General to recognize civil society platforms such as (and not limited to) the annual ASEAN Civil Society Conference/ ASEAN Peoples Forum (ACSC/APF), ASEAN Youth Forum, and ASEAN Disability Forum.

12. We call for the ASEAN Secretary-General to institutionalize civil society’s engagement with ASEAN organs and sectoral bodies, i.e. ASEAN Ministers Meeting (AMM).

The Review of the Terms of References (TOR)

13. We request the ASEAN Secretary-General and the ASEAN Secretariat to facilitate the process of the TOR’s review and the participation of civil society groups, national human rights institutions, and broader stakeholders. The process of review should be transparent, accountable to the people and ensure substantive participation.

14. We envision that the review of TOR leads to strengthening the ASEAN human rights mechanisms with a dedicated secretariat, stronger protection mandate covering all rights under international standards, and independent and qualified Representatives through open selection processes, accountable to the people.

ASEAN Secretariat

15. We are on the view that the capacity of the ASEAN Secretariat needs to be strengthened, especially on engaging the stakeholders, public outreaching, updating information in the website to make it accessible to different needs, such as providing multiple languages and disabled-friendly.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

Iboto ang iyong #HRPinduterosChoice para sa HR WEBSITES.

Iboto ang iyong #HRPinduterosChoice para sa HR WEBSITES.

HR WEBSITE LOGOAng botohan ay magsisimula ngayon hanggang sa 11:59PM ng Nov 15, 2013.

IKAW PARA KANINO KA PIPINDOT? Simple lang bumoto:

  • pindutin ang inyong napupusuan sa poll button sa ibaba ng post na ito
  • i-LIKE din ang thumbnail/s ng iyong mga ibinoboto sa HRonlinePH facebook, i-share at ikampanya.
  • Most number of the combined likes sa FB at sa poll buttons ang magiging 3rd HR Pinduteros Choice na kikilalanin sa 2013 HR week celebration.

Makiisa sa pagpapalaganap ng impormasyon hinggil sa karapatang pantao. Pindot na!

WHAT IS 3RD HR PINDUTEROS CHOICE AWARDS? https://hronlineph.com/2013/10/01/3rd-human-rights-pinduteros-choice-awards/

————-

FINALISTS FOR HR WEBSITE

1. http://clrdc.wordpress.com

CHILDREN’S LEGAL RIGHTS AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC.

1 CLRD

is a non-stock, non-profit legal resource human rights organization for children committed to advancing children’s rights and welfare through the provision of its services based on human rights developmental framework approach and methodologies.

2. http://philrights.org

PHILIPPINE HUMAN RIGHTS INFORMATION CENTER

2 PHILRIGHTS

PhilRights envisions a just, democratic, peaceful and prosperous Philippines founded on a culture of human rights and gender equity. It envisions a society where each individual is able to fully realize one’s potential as a human person, to participate effectively in the economic, political and cultural life, and to share equitably in the benefits of economic progress.

3. http://phildeafres.org

PHILIPPINE DEAF RESOURCE CENTER

3 PDRC

To serve as a nationwide center for the Filipino Deaf community, and its individual and collective stakeholders, in the various needs, challenges and issues that concern it, by:

Encouraging, conducting and commissioning RESEARCH, particularly on sign language linguistics and interpreting, employment and livelihood, education, health and counseling, policy-making and legislation, media and technology, and Deaf culture and the arts;

Gathering and providing INFORMATION through the development of materials, and their publication and dissemination by print or electronic means; and

serving as a NETWORKING support for caregivers of the Deaf, advocates for the community, and Deaf organizations.

4. http://ctuhr.org

CENTER FOR TRADE UNION AND HUMAN RIGHTS

4 CTUHR

CTUHR is committed to the cause of advancing genuine, democratic, nationalist and militant trade unionism. It is against all forms of deception and coercion that seeks to derail this cause. The Center believes that repression can and has taken on different and subtle forms like labour legislations, and flexible employment schemes, amongst others and therefore devotes herself to exposing these devious moves.

5. http://find.org.ph

FAMILIES OF VICTIMS OF INVOLUNTARY DISAPPEARANCE

5 FIND

FIND untiringly searches for the disappeared and fights for justice through participative empowerment of its members. It upholds and actively works for the protection of human rights, particularly the protection of persons from enforced or involuntary disappearance, and links arms with local and international groups working for justice and peace in the spirit of respect, trust and mutual cooperation.

6. http://amnesty.org.ph

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL

6 AIPH

is a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights to be respected and protected for everyone.

7. http://philippinehumanrights.org

PHILIPPINE ALLIANCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCATES

7 PAHRA

PAHRA envisions a just, democratic, and peaceful Philippines founded on human rights culture. It envisions a society where there is gender equity, recognition of multiculturalism, environmental protection, and sustainable development. As such, all individuals and peoples are able to fully realize their potentials, participate and contribute in the economic, political, social and cultural life of society, and share equitably in the benefits of economic progress.

8. http://alyansatigilmina.net

ALYANSA TIGIL MINA

8 ATM

The Alyansa Tigil Mina was born out of the collective concern of Non-Government Organizations, People’s Organizations and other Civil Society Groups against the impending threat of the revitalization of the mining industry in the Philippines. In mid-2004, NGOs/ POs, decided to disengage from a series of consultations convened by the DENR regarding the revitalization of the mining industry.

9. http://humanrightsdefenderspilipinas.wordpress.com

HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS–PILIPINAS

9 HRD

HRDP was born-out from the series of campaigns of civil society organizations against the rising phenomenon of extra-judicial killings of human rights workers and activists in Philippines in 2006. This was highlighted with the official visit of the UN Special Rapporteur onSummary Execution Prof. Phillip Alston in March 2007; and, its subsequent report and recommendations on the Philippines at the UN Human Rights Council.

10. http://balayph.net

BALAY REHABILITATION CENTER

10 BALAY

The word balay, in many dialects in the Philippines, means a house, a shelter or a home. The name itself depicts protection, safety, and nurturance of well-being. In the course of the organization’s existence, the word balay have also signified a space where the people can work towards empowerment and development.

[Press Release] Civil Society Organisations demand meaningful engagement with ASEAN human rights bodies

Civil Society Organisations demand meaningful engagement with ASEAN human rights bodies

Civil Society from a number of ASEAN countries have just convened at the 6th Regional Consultation on ASEAN and Human Rights in Jakarta from 1-2 October 2013. Over 80 participants from more than 59 organizations, both within and outside the ASEAN region gathered to discuss a range of issues, including strategies for bringing about meaningful engagement with ASEAN human rights mechanisms. The Consultation was co-organized by the Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA), a regional human rights organization, the Commission of the Disappeared and Victims of Violence (KontraS), and a network of ASEAN civil society – SAPA Task Force on ASEAN and Human Rights.

ForumAsia Logo

The Consultation was encouraged by the efforts of individual members of AICHR to turn it into an independent body actively protecting human rights and applying international human rights standards, but regretted that AICHR as a whole has remained closed to dialogue and has achieved little, not least because it is paralysed by political interests and the veto powers that every member state has through decision-making by consensus only. In comparison, the ACWC is much more open to dialogue and cooperation with civil society.

Evelyn Balais Serrano, the Executive Director of FORUM-ASIA, explained: “We hope that the Regional Consultation on ASEAN and Human Rights continues to be used as a platform for dialogue, cooperation and coordination for ASEAN civil society’s regional human rights work and for engagement with AICHR and ACWC.”

The two main issues discussed during the Consultation were the review of the AICHR Terms of Reference (TOR) which should commence in 2014; and the issue of business and human rights in ASEAN.

The current AICHR TOR does not provide a detailed protection mandate protection that would explicitly enable it to respond to human rights violations and issues in the ASEAN region. Speakers and participants of the Regional Consultation discussed the need for the AICHR to receive a stronger mandate when the TOR is reviewed. However, the existing TOR has already provided a range of opportunities for protection work. Dr Yuval Ginbar, a Legal Adviser for Amnesty International stated: “So far during their first term, both the AICHR (2009-2012) and ACWC (2010-2013) have adopted a narrow interpretation of their protection mandates. the AICHR has not seized these opportunities to protect people from human rights violations. Even pending the revision, the AICHR should broaden its understanding of its protection mandate, as well as fully implement its current mandate including in fields such as encouraging ratification of human rights treaties and obtaining information on human rights from Member States”.

A Philippines participant, Ms Sunshine Serrano of the Task Force Detainees of the Philippines said: “As part of our commitment to ensure promotion and protection of human rights in ASEAN regional, we (civil society) want to continue our efforts to engage with the AICHR, even when currently most of the communications with them is a one-way traffic.”

Having two bodies working on human right in ASEAN, civil society views the importance for the AICHR and the ACWC to work together and engage with civil society. Muhammad Jailani of the Child Rights Coalition Asia (CRC Asia) commented: “The AICHR and the ACWC, have to develop open discussion with civil society and the people of ASEAN as a whole, including children.”

The Consultation also identified the lack of support from member states of ASEAN to the AICHR and the ACWC. Joseph Wah from Burma Partnership emphasised: “In order to be able to work effectively, governments of ASEAN must provide the AICHR and the ACWC with sufficient human and financial resource, and also independent secretariats”.

The 6th Regional Consultation on ASEAN and Human Rights concluded that the review of the TOR should be carried out in a transparent way, with participation of civil society. Chalida Tajaroensuk, the co-convenor of SAPA TFAHR hope that the review of the TOR will ensure engagement with civil society. “Engagement means not only regulations providing for meetings with civil society but a meaningful engagement, where the collective voice of civil society is considered when the AICHR does its work”

Evelyn Balais Serrano also reiterated: “We welcome the AICHR’s effort to finalize the Guidelines on Relations with Civil Society Organizations and call on it to ensure that the Guidelines facilitate meaningful and mutually beneficial engagement while respecting the independence of CSOs”

Jakarta, 2 October 2013

For further information please contact:

Evelyn Balais-Serrano (Executive Director of FORUM-ASIA; evelyn@forum-asia.org )
Chalida Tajaroensuk (Executive Director of People’s Empowerment Foundation – Thailand; chalida.empowerment@gmail.com
Haris Azhar (Coordinator of KontraS; harisazhar@kontras.org )
Atnike Nova Sigiro (Program Manager ASEAN Advocacy of FORUM-ASIA; atnike@forum-asia.org )

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[From the web] Address trafficking for better handling of human rights -Forum-Asia

Address trafficking for better handling of human rights
The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
October 02 2013

Addressing problems of human trafficking and migration within Southeast Asia is a realistic way to improve regional cooperation on human rights despite the principle of non-interference of ASEAN, a leading activist said.

ForumAsia Logo

Thida Khus, a leader of the Women’s Caucus in Southeast Asia, told The Jakarta Post on Tuesday that the 10 government members of ASEAN were more open to discuss cross border issues on illegal immigrants and human trafficking, compared to other more “political” issues.

“We wouldn’t be interfering [into states’ sovereignty] because the issues are cross border in nature,” Khus said.

Speakers at the two-day 6th Regional Consultation on ASEAN and Human Rights raised the “sensitivity” of several member states including Myanmar.

Hundreds of the Rohingya ethnic minority have fled to Indonesian waters, saying they are persecuted by the Myanmar government. Indonesian undocumented migrant workers in Malaysia also remain an unresolved issue.

Khus, also a leader of Silaka, a women’s NGO in Cambodia, was one of the speakers at the talks, which involved several NGOs as well as the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR).

Next year ASEAN is scheduled to review the commission’s terms of reference, which limit the body’s mandate to request information from member states “on the promotion and protection of human rights.”

Khus proposed that the commission work together on trafficking and migration, for instance, with the ASEAN Commission on the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Women and Children.

As the commissions largely included government representatives, speakers warned that the ASEAN bodies, especially AICHR, lacked transparency.

More cooperation between the commissions would encourage ASEAN to address issues such as trafficking, Khus said.

The regional association, representing some 600 million people, is still widely criticized following the signing of the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration in Phnom Penh in November 2012.

Indonesia’s representative to the AICHR, Rafendi Djamin, said exposure to human rights violations was still new to most ASEAN countries, which includes new democracies, monarchies and socialist states.

However, Rafendi said he tried to “push existing opportunities” since the commission’s establishment in October 2009.

I Gusti Agung Wesaka, directorate general of ASEAN Cooperation at the Foreign Ministry, said the government fully supported efforts to improve the association’s handling of human rights.

Evelyn Balais-Serrano, executive director of Forum Asia the co-organizer of the talks, had raised the recent conviction of activists in Myanmar who protested against the Shwe Gas Pipeline Project in Arakan.

With strong pressure to create an ASEAN Economic community by 2015, Serrano said, talks on corporate social responsibility and human rights in the region would be increasingly relevant. (url)

Link: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/10/02/address-trafficking-better-handling-human-rights.html
Atnike Nova Sigiro
ASEAN Advocacy Programme Manager
Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)
Jalan Borobudur No. 14, Menteng, Jakarta Pusat
13510 – INDONESIA
Email: atnike@forum-asia.org
Telp: +62-21-31922975

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Event] Red-Baiting Forum 2013 -IPON

Red-Baiting Forum 2013

As a follow-up to our 2012 Red-Baiting Conference we cordially invite you to our
Red-Baiting Forum 2013

(on October 4th at UP Balay Kalinaw, Quezon City)

Based on the talks and results of the two previous forums, objective of the Red-Baiting Forum 2013 is to bring together Philippine state actors, international actors and national/international CSOs/NGOs to gather ideas and recommendations on a “Guideline to AFP ground line personnel on the prevention of Red-Baiting/Red-Labeling of HRDs and/or their legal organizations in conflict and non-conflict situations”.

IPON logo

Red-Baiting in the Philippines can be described as a political strategy to accuse, denounce and persecute individuals and groups as members of communist organizations like the CPP-NDF-NPA in order to obstruct their work. The most forceful and extreme examples of Red-Baiting related violations of human rights are enforced disappearances, torture and extralegal killings.

Funded by the German Federal Foreign Office, IPON emphasizes this crucial issue that deals with threats to the existence of civil society organizations and their members in the third year.
Among the victims of Red-Baiting, human rights defenders are particularly endangered. They become victims of physical and legal harassments because of their peaceful engagement in their demand for human rights. Therefore it is the responsibility of the Philippine state to particularly take measures to protect human rights defenders and provide a situation in which they can peacefully strive for their rights without any kind of repressions.

Together we want to share perspectives, find common grounds and work out practical steps towards possible solutions. We sincerely hope that you will support us with your expertise and knowledge in this important policy design process.

Please feel free to contact us in case of further inquiries.

Nina Johnen
(Country & Project Coordinator)

R.S.V.P. (until Sept 30th), n.johnen@ipon-philippines.org, +63 (0)92 797 016 75

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Press Release] Special Meeting of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights 2013 -Forum Asia

Special Meeting of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights 2013

ForumAsia Logo

The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) convened a Special Meeting on 14 to 16 August 2013 in Ha Noi, Viet Nam. The Special Meeting was chaired by H.E. Pehin Dato Dr. Awang Hj. Ahmad bin Hj. Jumat, the Representative of Brunei Darussalam and the Chair of the AICHR. The Meeting had a full agenda, taking focus on the implementation of the AICHR’s Priority Programmes and Activities 2013. Several concept papers for upcoming workshops and trainings were adopted; among them were the Workshop on Combating Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children which is expected to be conducted in November 2013, the Training of the Trainers on Human Rights for public prosecutors and police officers to be conducted in mid-November, as well as the AICHR Regional Workshop on the Promotion of Maternal Health and Reduction of Maternal Mortality also expected to be conducted in November 2013.

The Meeting also discussed the preparations of the launching of the book of the translations of the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (AHRD) and the Phnom Penh Statement on the Adoption of the AHRD. The book is a compilation of the translations of the two documents into the national languages of the ASEAN Member States. The book will be launched in conjunction with the ASEAN Day celebrations on 23 August 2013 at the ASEAN Secretariat. The AICHR will be partnering with the Committee of Permanent Representatives (CPR) to hold a panel discussion at the launching on the AHRD and the ASEAN Community Building 2015.

The Meeting was presented with the Summary of the Human Rights Dialogue, organised by the Government of Indonesia for the AICHR Representatives. The AICHR appreciated the initiative by the Government of Indonesia to convene the Human Rights Dialogue which supported the work of the AICHR.

The Meeting expressed their appreciation to the Representative of Viet Nam and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam for the hospitality and excellent arrangements. The AICHR plans to conduct another meeting in November 2013 in the Philippines

Link: http://aichr.org/press-release/press-release-special-meeting-of-the-asean-intergovernmental-commission-on-human-rights-2013/#more-1174

ASEAN Advocacy Programme Manager
Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)
Jalan Borobudur No. 14, Menteng, Jakarta Pusat
13510 – INDONESIA
Email: atnike@forum-asia.org
Telp: +62-21-31922975

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Statement] Civil society rejects flawed ASEAN Human Rights Declaration

Civil society rejects flawed ASEAN Human Rights Declaration

Phnom Penh, Cambodia — 62 grassroots, national, regional, and international civil society groups are calling upon ASEAN Member States to postpone the adoption of the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration, which is not worthy of its name.

The organizations vow to reject the Declaration if it is adopted with its current text. Instead, they urge ASEAN Member States to send the draft back to the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) with instruction to revise it so that it accords with international human rights law.

The Declaration as it stands now unquestionably fails to meet existing international human rights standards, let alone add value to them. It flies in the face of the international consensus on human rights principles that have been in place for more than six decades. Of utmost concern are specific provisions in the Declaration’s General Principles, which tear at the heart of long accepted human rights precepts. Under these provisions, the enjoyment of the rights provided in the Declaration is to be “balanced with the performance of duties” (GP 6), subjected to “national and regional contexts” and to considerations of “different cultural, religious and historical backgrounds” (GP 7). Moreover, all of the rights provided in the Declaration would be subject to restriction on a wide array of grounds including “national security” and “public morality” (GP 8).

No other universal or regional instrument applies a “balance” between the enjoyment of rights and freedoms against duties and responsibilities. On the contrary, these instruments are founded upon the idea that human rights are the birthright of all persons, not some kind of commodity that must be earned. International law and practice do not permit such broad restrictions that could, in effect, serve to excuse the violation of the rights guaranteed elsewhere in the Declaration. Finally, international law imposes on all ASEAN Member States the duty, regardless of their “national and regional contexts,” to respect and protect all human rights and fundamental freedoms.

Civil society groups have repeatedly expressed grave concerns over both the drafting process and the substance of the Declaration since the initiative began. The AICHR met with regional civil society only towards the very end of the process and ignored most of their recommendations. Some individual AICHR representatives held consultations with civil society groups nationally, but such meetings were mostly ineffective. In some countries, no consultations were held at all. Most of the drafting process was conducted in secret and texts were rarely shared and never publicized.

For the Government of Cambodia, the adoption of this fundamentally flawed Declaration during the 21st ASEAN Summit in Phnom Penh will reflect negatively on its role and legacy in building the region’s human rights system.

The AICHR should also conduct a drafting exercise in a transparent manner and invite grassroots, national, regional, and international civil society to participate meaningfully in the process.

If the ASEAN Member States decline to continue the drafting process and proceed with the adoption of the Declaration in its current form, the organizations will reject the Declaration and condemn its adoption. The people of the region and the international human rights community and stakeholders will continue to rely primarily upon existing international instruments for human rights protection in the ASEAN.
Endorsed By:

1. ASEAN Watch, Thailand

2. ALTSEAN-Burma

3. Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)

4. ASEAN LGBTIQ Caucus

5. Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact (AIPP)

6. Asosiasi Kewirausahaan Sosial Indonesia (AKSI)

7. Amnesty International

8. ASEAN Disability Forum (ADF)

9. Bank Information Centre (BIC)

10. Boat People S.O.S.

11. Burma Issues

12. Burma Partnership (BP)

13. Cambodian Food and Service Workers Federation (CFSWF)

14. The Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)

15. The Cambodia Youth Indigenous Association (CIYA)

16. Coalition to Abolish Modern-day Slavery in Asia

17. Community Management Centre (CMC)

18. DEMA Malaysia

19. Dignity International

20. ELSAM Papua

21. Focus on the Global South

22. FONGTIL – The NGO Forum of Timor-Leste

23. Housing Rights Task Force (HRTF)

24. Human Rights Foundation of Monland (HURFOM)

25. Human Rights Watch

26. IMPARSIAL- The Indonesian Human Rights Monitor

27. Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)

28. The International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC)

29. Indigenous Peoples Task Force (IPTF)

30. Indonesia for Humans

31. International Commission of Jurists (ICJ)

32. International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)

33. Institute for Essential Services Reform (IESR), Indonesia

34. Knowledge and Rights with Young People through Safer Spaces (KRYSS)

35. Land Reform Chiang Mai

36. Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Yogyakarta

37. Migrant Forum in Asia

38. Nationalities Youth Forum

39. Palaung Women’s Organization

40. Peace Way Foundation

41. People’s Empowerment Foundation

42. People Like Us (PLU)

43. Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates (PAHRA)

44. Philwomen on ASEAN

45. PT Foundation

46. Rainbow Rights Project Inc.

47. SAMIN Indonesia

48. Sayoni

49. Seksualiti Merdeka

50. Shwe Gas Movement

51. Southeast Asia Committee for Advocacy (SEACA)

52. Solidaritas Perempuan

53. Southeast Asia Women’s Caucus on ASEAN

54. Task Force Detainees Philippines (TFDP)

55. Taxi Network Thailand

56. Thai Transgender Alliance

57. The Commission for the Disappeared and Victims of Violence (KontraS)

58. Towards Ecological Recovery and Regional Alliance (TERRA)

59. Disabled Persons International (Asia-Pacific)

60. Peace and Conflict Studies Center (National University of Timor-Leste)

61. People’s Empowerment Foundation (PEF)

62. Urban Community Mission Jakarta

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Event] Forum on Fighting Corporate Power and Impunity of TNCs -NAGKAISA

We are inviting social movement activists to participate in the following NAGKAISA-sponsored events in during the 5th World Social Forum on Migration:

1. Forum on Fighting Corporate Power and Impunity of TNCs, 26 November 2012, 1-6 PM, SDC Conference Hall, Ateneo de Manila University. The forum is part of the global campaign for a binding treaty that would make TNCs accountable for violating workers’ and people’s rights with impunity. You can find more information about the campaign in http://www.stopcorporateimpunity.org.

2. Asian Social Movements’ Assembly, 28 November 2012, 9AM-6PM, SDC Conference Hall, Ateneo de Manila University. This is the 4th open meeting of various Asian social movements aimed at building solidarity and coordination of actions that would address economic and climate crises and fight for systemic changes.

To register, please email your name and organization to josua@apl.org.ph or send an SMS to 0917 794-2431.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Statement] ASEAN Human Rights Declaration Limited by ‘morality’ -Southeast Asian Women´s Caucus on ASEAN

ASEAN Human Rights Declaration Limited by ‘morality’
Say Women’s Organisations

The   Southeast Asian Women´s Caucus on ASEAN has expressed disappointment in the final version of the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (AHRD) adopted by ASEAN leaders on 18 November 2012.

The Women´s Caucus said that the Declaration has too many limitations and loopholes to be useful. “The Declaration has failed to uphold international standards” said the Caucus. “The Declaration makes rights subject to national laws, but national laws may discriminate against women and may not be fully compliant with international human rights standards. The Declaration also states that rights need to be ‘balanced’ with responsibilities which undermines existing commitments that ASEAN states are party to” she added.

The Caucus particularly denounced the inclusion of general limitations on rights premised on ‘public morality’, as being restrictive and a failure to uphold existing international obligations as well as other ASEAN declarations. “The idea that human rights can be limited to protect ‘public morality’ is really concerning” said Kate Lappin from the Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development.” There is no definition of public morality in the Declaration to ensure it is interpreted progressively. Women in ASEAN still live in unequal societies, where culture and tradition dictate a lesser and differentiated status for women. Thus, notions of morality are most commonly used against women, to control women’s bodies and sexuality” she added.

Women’s rights and legal experts were consulted in the lead up to civil society submissions and all agreed that the subjective term ‘morality’ is an unnecessary and dangerous basis for limiting rights to be included in international law and is most likely to be used to limit the rights of women and marginalised groups[1].

Women’s groups campaigned to have the reference to public morality removed from the draft declaration. Numerous international human rights groups and experts agreed that the public morality clause is an anachronism that doesn’t belong in a modern declaration on human rights.

It appears that the majority of the ten member states agreed with the women’s rights activists and supported its removal. However a few states one being Malaysia, a member of the Human Rights Council strongly disagreed and insisted on the retention of the clause. “Allowing some states´ out dated concerns to prevail reduces ASEAN to a body striving for the lowest common denominator” said Ivy Josiah, Executive Director of Women’s Aid Organisation. She further added “consensus has its perils when the national interests of one member state triumph at the expense of universal human rights”.

The Women’s Caucus calls on all ASEAN states to ensure that the Declaration is interpreted progressively, without undermining the established universal principles and standards of human rights. ASEAN states will be held accountable in ensuring that the spirit and principles of the Declaration in no way negate the human rights and fundamental freedoms of the peoples of ASEAN as stated in Article 40 of the Declaration

_____________________________
¹ The report containing the opinions of experts consulted can be accessed at http://www.apwld.org

19th November 2012
Chiang Mai, Thailand

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Statement] JOINT STATEMENT OF the 2nd ASEAN Civil Society Conference/ ASEAN People Forum (ACSC/APF) 2012 Phnom Penh, 16 November 2012

JOINT STATEMENT OF the 2nd ASEAN Civil Society Conference/ ASEAN People Forum (ACSC/APF) 2012
Phnom Penh, 16 November 2012

Preamble

The ASEAN Civil Society Conference/ASEAN People‟s Forum (ACSC/APF) 2012 took place on the 14-16 November 2012. The event, attended by over 500 delegates, included not only participants from ASEAN member states but also representatives invited from African Union, European Union and a delegation from the USA.

A key discussion that took place over the course of the event was ASEAN member states‟ failure to produce an ASEAN Human Rights Declaration that matches or even exceeds existing international human rights standards. As such, we the delegates of the ACSC/APF, refuse to endorse the Declaration and instead, will continue to use standards set in international human rights instruments, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to measure progress in the region.

ASEAN professes to be people-centered, however, the conduct of the Cambodian government in response to ACSC/APF has demonstrated that this principle has not been translated into action. As a result of intimidation by Cambodian authorities, two venue hosts reneged their agreements, in an attempt to curtail the constitutionally-guaranteed rights to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.

ASEAN member states, in particular, those that do not currently hold elections, must commit to periodic free and fair elections with the presence of both citizen observers and international observers. Only then can we begin to fulfill ASEAN‟s potential to promote good governance, democracy and rule of law.

ASEAN is not just made up of governments but the people they serve. We the people take this role very seriously, because it affects our lives and the lives of future generations. Realizing the objectives laid out in the ASEAN Economic Blueprint has been the priority of ASEAN, which has been moving ahead with little regard to the citizens who will be most affected by it. ASEAN needs to open space, including genuine freedom of association and speech, for citizens to participate, take ownership and lessen the impact of negative consequences. ASEAN must embrace the key principles of the respect for human rights and the international human rights standards that all ASEAN countries adhere to. Sustainable and equitable economic development will only be achieved if ASEAN transforms into a genuinely people-centered community. That is why we are here today. Therefore we urge the adoption of the following recommendations:

ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT

Food security, land and ocean grabbing
Ocean Grabbing and Food Sovereignty

The dominant model of development for economic growth has led to an agricultural crisis and natural disaster in developing countries due to lax natural resource management and the lack of sustainable development principles.. Local producers are threatened by unfair competition from imports. Land and ocean grabbing is likely to increase with ASEAN economic integration in 2015.
The 90 million workers in the fishing industry remain among the most poorly remunerated workers in the production sectors. National policies, such as large-scale subsidies, favor big vessel operators and fishpond owners. Privatization of coastal resources worsens the trend towards resource grabbing. Furthermore, poor enforcement of fishery laws and corruption within implementing agencies has led to the rise of illegal fishing.

These trends have not only threatened the livelihoods of poor fishers in the region but also led to massive over-fishing and destruction of water bodies such as lakes, rivers, mangroves and coastal resources.

In view of this, we call for the following:

1. Review the economic model being pursued by ASEAN which emphasizes more trade liberalization and increased investment by corporations in the fishery, coastal and agriculture resource industries. ASEAN should consider pursuing a model which protects and recognises the resource rights of vulnerable farmers and fishers.

2. Stop land, ocean and other resource grabbing in the region. ASEAN and national governments should adopt regional agreements and policies that reduce widespread private investment in and privatization of land, coastal, freshwater and fishery bodies;

3. For the governments of ASEAN member states to adopt policies that give farmers and fishers secure tenure, ownership, control and management of their land, freshwater and coastal/fishery resources.

4. For all fishers to be able to participate actively and substantially in decision-making in agriculture and fishery policies and specifically in the negotiations of the Food and Agriculture Organization instrument on fishery resource access, including the Fishers Code of Conduct.

5. For the governments of ASEAN member states to support programs of community management of coastal, freshwater and other fishery resources.

Natural Resources
Extractive Industry

Revenue from extractive industries is the foundation for the development of the economy and the huge driver toward poverty alleviation of the ASEAN member states. Extractive industries, if accountably and transparently managed, can avoid the so-called resource curse. It is of great importance that civil society organisations (CSOs) are given enough space for public engagement in the development of the extractive industry‟s legal framework to help promote just, accountable and inclusive policies. CSOs are relentlessly campaigning for ASEAN countries to adopt the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI).
Recommendations:

1. ASEAN member states should adopt the EITI;
2. ASEAN should create a legal framework on extractive industries;
3. All ASEAN member states should adopt access-to-information laws;
4. Develop multi-stakeholders mechanism to promote good governance and transparency in extractive industries and natural resource management.
5. Guarantee transparency through frequent, perhaps monthly, financial and progress reports by the extractive industry.
6. To ensure transparency in oil, gas and mining revenues, countries should develop and adopt a legal framework and policy for domestic and international investment companies.

ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint and Regional Integration and its Implication for Women from a Gender Perspective

Many ASEAN documents state that the three ASEAN pillars must be viewed as “closely intertwined and mutually reinforcing”. In fact, the contrary is true. The pillars have been formulated in isolation without consideration of their collective impact. The political emphasis has been on the economic community/blueprints, which pose huge threats to people‟s access to their means of subsistence. Without mechanisms to include serious participation by its people, ASEAN can expect increasing violations of fundamental human rights, women‟s rights, environmental sustainability, social injustice and gender injustice and inequality.

We recommend ASEAN member states adopt mechanisms to:

1. Ensure that the voices of those affected are integrated into the collective policy of the ASEAN communities.
2. Ensure all measures and policies of member states protect human rights, women‟s rights, indigenous people‟s rights and the rights of marginalized and vulnerable peoples.
3. Uphold the principle of non-discrimination for age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, race, class, nationality, religion, ability or any other distinction.
4. Adopt the ASEAN Framework Instrument on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers, which protects all migrant workers, skilled and unskilled, documented and undocumented, and their families.
5. Ensure that economic and investment policies do not result in land grabbing that uproots lives, especially those of women and the marginalized, through forced eviction and involuntary resettlement.
6. Provide effective remedies for violence against women. Protect sexual and reproductive rights, the right to a healthy environment and other rights guaranteed by international treaties and standards.
7. Ensure that women are involved in all levels of decision-making nationally and internationally.
8. Adopt and ratify the ILO Convention 189 on Domestic Workers.
9. Guard against extensions of intellectual property rights in national or regional trade agreements that restrict access to medicines and undermine public health.

Trade Unions, Labor Rights and Workers
Labor Trend on ASEAN

The labor issue in the ASEAN region has become an increasing priority due to the upcoming economic integration in 2015. There has been significant movement of workers from developing member states of ASEAN to the more developed states. There are three main points in relation to labor issues that needed to be considered by ASEAN and its constituent members, and upon which we have based recommendations:

Recommendations:
1. Protect workers’ rights in ASEAN
 Ensure decent salaries for workers and employees;
 Ensure occupational safety protection for workers in construction and other sectors;
 Workers should work no longer than 8 hours a day and 5 days a week.
 Ensure the rights of trade unions to be able to negotiate collectively
 Reduce the prevalence of short term contracts and sub-contractors
 Ensure migrant workers are protected by relevant laws and related agencies.
2. Implement a mechanism to ensure risk prevention and prevent other related violations against employees and migrant workers
 The promulgation of a new labor law within ASEAN;
 The implementation of policy, legal framework and others mechanisms in relation to this topic.
 All ASEAN member states must adopt a Memorandum of Understanding to protect migrant workers who work within their countries.
 ASEAN member states must guarantee the rights of migrant women, including marriage migrants, and put in place mechanisms to ensure women‟s empowerment.
 ASEAN member states must include protection mechanisms for women and families abandoned by migrant workers.
3. The creation of a legal framework within ASEAN
 Set up a transparency committee, sector, and adopt a transparent approach to all sectors;
 Create a national and regional migration protection law to ensure the safety of migrants; and
 Provide a mechanism for the people of ASEAN members to raise concerns within the region in relation to labor issues.

SOCIAL-CULTURAL
Labor and sex trafficking
Modern-day slavery in and from ASEAN

Human trafficking within and from ASEAN remains a serious problem. Laws, policies, and practices by ASEAN member states often fail to protect millions of migrant workers, and often contribute to or are complicit in their enslavement, facilitating brokers, recruitment agents, labor export companies, outsourcing companies and unscrupulous employers to profit from the exploitation of migrant workers both in sending and receiving countries.

Notwithstanding efforts by civil society to highlight these cases to national governments for further action, these perpetrators continue their exploitative practices with impunity. The coordination between national ministries and across ASEAN member states to work collaboratively and in a coordinated manner is inadequate and sometimes even exacerbates the problem by detaining and/or otherwise punishing the victims – sex trafficking victims as well as workers who have been held in debt bondage or slave-like conditions – rather than the perpetrators.

Although ASEAN member states earn profits in the billions of US Dollars from facilitation of migration, both from recruitment fees, levies and other government charges and from labor that sustains their national economies, ASEAN member states demonstrate a high degree of reluctance to provide sufficient resources towards combatting human trafficking in the areas of prevention, protection and prosecution of this trans-national crime.

We recommend that ASEAN member states:

1. Enact national anti-trafficking-in-persons laws and policies that meet international standards including the Palermo Protocol;
2. Provide sufficient resources for the investigation, prosecution, and conviction of perpetrators, especially in cases where such perpetrators are corrupt government officials or their accomplices;
3. Discontinue labor export and recruitment policies and practices that facilitate human trafficking;
4. Engage with and provide resources for CSOs to provide services and protection for victims of sex trafficking as well as workers who have been held in debt bondage or slave-like conditions (labor trafficking);
5. Enact immigration and labor laws that provide victims, especially migrant workers, with the right to reside and work legally until such time as they are willing and able to be repatriated safely;
6. Embark upon robust nation-wide campaigns to bring awareness about human trafficking, targeting factors that are likely to lead potential victims into trafficking as well as prejudicial and stereotypical views about migrant workers;
7. ASEAN should ensure that both sending and receiving countries be held jointly responsible to promote and uphold the rights of women migrants of due recognition to their contribution to the respective countries‟ development.

Human Rights
A Review of the Terms of Reference (TOR) of ASEAN Inter-Governmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR)

The review of the Terms of Reference of AICHR process in 2014 under Myanmar‟s chairmanship will provide an opportunity to identify challenges and opportunities and a plan for the future. Civil society organizations and others want ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) to evolve into a credible, independent, responsive and accessible regional human rights mechanism in ASEAN.

Recommendations:

1. There should be more transparency in the recruitment for AICHR. To reflect this transparency, the term inter-governmental within AICHR should be changed to independent. Principles of the TOR concerning non-interference and sovereignty should be changed. The principle of impartiality should be adopted.
2. AICHR needs to have a human rights protection mechanism, as well as a mechanism to engage all relevant stakeholders, in particular CSOs, in ASEAN.
3. CSOs need to have a clear idea of what AICHR should achieve in the next three years and bring it to the attention of the foreign ministers of each member state.
4. CSOs need to be more creative about how they lobby for change. AICHR must increase public awareness so that everyone in the region understands its role.

Indigenous and ethnic minority and human rights
IP/EM in ASEAN community: Promote and Protect rights to Land, Territory, Natural Resources and Development of IP/EM

The Indigenous Peoples and Ethnic Minorities (IPs&EM) in the ASEAN community are distinct peoples with their own unique identity. They call on member states to recognize their rights through the implementation of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and other international instruments. They have a right to free, prior and informed consent on any laws, policies, and programs that affect their communities and nations. Their right to customary laws and self-governance should be respected in relation to sustainable management of lands, territories and resources.

Recommendations:

1. ASEAN member states should establish and reinforce effective redress mechanisms and access to justice for damages from past and current projects in which indigenous peoples were not consulted. This should include legal pluralism approaches rooted in traditional cultures
2. Local, national and regional governments should establish mechanisms by indigenous peoples participate in all decision-making processes including in matter of governance of state.
3. ASEAN member states need to ratify and immediately implement the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) and International Labor Organization Convention 169. They must reviewing and repealing national laws and policies that discriminate against IPs&EM.
4. Each member state should immediately implement its Universal Periodic Review recommendations regarding IPs&EM. In the second cycle, IPs&EM should be included in preparation of the state report as key stakeholders. States should also accept recommendations relating to IPs&EM.
5. To build an ASEAN community by 2015 that is consistent with UNDRIP, member states should designate an indigenous peoples focal person within the AICHR to set up a working group for the respect, promotion and protection of indigenous peoples.

Sex Worker Rights
Sex worker-ASEAN

ASEAN plans to promote tourism in its member states. Despite their important contribution to this industry, the region‟s 1.2 million sex workers remain undervalued. They encounter serious and systematic discrimination in the application of immigration law. Because their work is criminalized, they are denied visas, work permits and all other protections and benefits that are applied to recognized workers, forcing them to deal with the risks of extortion and exploitation. Contrary to ASEAN‟s stated obligations, sex workers are routinely denied the legal protection and benefits offered to others. Corrupt police and other authorities systematically exploit, coerce and abuse the basic human rights of sex workers with impunity. Economic, religious and cultural considerations continue to hinder public health programs to fight AIDS, so the infection rate remains unacceptably high in the sex worker community.

Sex workers call on ASEAN governments to:
1. Guarantee that all ASEAN peoples can migrate and travel safely, with equal access to services including health and legal services, regardless of occupation. This must include an end to discriminatory immigration policies and practices that restrict the movement of sex workers.
2. Ensure sex workers receive equal protection and benefits under the law; and freedom from abuse by police and other state and non-state actors, including religious bodies.
3. Reform public health programming to provide sex workers with the highest standards of health services, especially HIV prevention.
4. The ASEAN Tourism Plan proposes to offer education and skills to tourism workers. Sex workers call on ASEAN Tourism Ministers Committee to create a fund available to sex workers and their organizations for education, skill training and other opportunities for other non-direct sex-related vocations.

LGBT Rights

Inclusion of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) issues and Rights in the ASEAN Civil Society Conference (ASCS)/ASEAN People’s Forum (APF) and in the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender/Transexual, Intersex and Queer (LGBTIQ) persons have documented and explicitly presented evidence of extensive human rights violations that occur throughout the ASEAN region. Hence they are incensed by the exclusion of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) in the draft of ASEAN‟s Human Rights Declaration. It is a blatant manifestation of discrimination against LBGTIQ persons. The LGBTIQ movement will never accept discrimination, abuse and violence as part of their existence by the denial of their rights and their humanity.

It is in this spirit of pride and dignity that we reclaim our rightful space in our respective countries and in our region, and demand our governments to:

1. Include SOGI provision into the ASEAN Declaration on Human Rights, specifically inclusion of reference to „gender identity‟ and „sexual orientation‟ in Article 2.
2. Immediately repeal laws that directly and indirectly criminalize SOGI, recognize LGBTIQ rights as human rights, and harmonize national laws, policies and practices with the Yogyakarta Principles.
3. Establish national-level mechanisms and review existing regional human rights instruments (e.g. AICHR, ACWC) to include the promotion and protection of the equal rights of all people regardless of SOGI with the active engagement of the LGBTIQ community.
4. Depathologize SOGI and promote psychological wellbeing of people of diverse SOGI in accordance with World Health Organization (WHO) standards and ensure equal access to health and social services.

Youth and Development
Young Volunteers in Southeast Asia: Immense Passion and Selfless Practice towards Positive Change

Volunteerism has always been one of the core values of social movements. Indeed, learning through direct acts of volunteerism will educate ASEAN‟s young generation. They can learn how to care, share and help each other. In that way, they can make their region more peaceful and its development more sustainable. However, society currently lacks a culture of volunteerism for many reasons. Youth who want to volunteer in other ASEAN member states face obstacles that need to be removed. They lack the financial backing and logistical support from their home governments.

Recommendations:

1. Promote volunteerism to all sectors in ASEAN community.
2. Have youth volunteer policies; provide more opportunities and strengthen the volunteer network for youth to contribute to society.
3. Provide both financial support and effective mechanisms.
4. Include volunteerism in the curricula of ASEAN educational institutions.
5. Establish a volunteer visa service for those who want to volunteer in Southeast Asia.

POLITICS AND SECUIRTY

ACSC Workshop: Solution for crisis in Arakan State: Strategy to be pushed forward by ASEAN
Continued sectarian violence between Rakhine and Rohingya communities in Arakan State, Myanmar, which started in June 2012 has resulted in hundreds of deaths and tens of thousands of internally displaced persons (IDPs). Renewed violence in October 2012 has disproportionately affected the Rohingyas, who forms the majority of IDPs and compound the problems they already experience as stateless persons.

Irresponsible reporting of the conflict which frames the issue as a religious conflict between Muslims and Buddhists misrepresents a complex reality and risks exacerbating the situation, as violence towards other Muslim ethnic minorities has occurred and is spreading beyond Arakan State so that the whole country has been affected by the conflict. Rather than preventing violence, local authorities have been responsible for perpetrating human rights violations.

Any measures to resolve the crisis must be conflict sensitive and take into account the perspectives of both the Rakhine and Rohingya communities. A solution to the problem must be developed as part of a national initiative. The national government needs to play a key role in addressing the issue rather than allowing the humanitarian situation to deteriorate. International humanitarian aid has not been allowed access to the area. The investigation commission set up by the government in response to the crisis is currently preparing a report of its findings which will be released in December 2012.

Recommendations:

1. The government should review the 1982 Nationality Law in consultation with both Rohingya and Rakhine communities to develop a mutually agreeable solution.
2. The government should take appropriate action to establish rule of law to stop the violence, and in such a way that does not violate human rights.
3. The government should allow humanitarian agencies unfettered access to affected Rohingya and Rakhine communities and internally displaced persons in Arakan state.
4. The government should allow foreign journalists access to Arakan state.
5. National media should refrain from inflammatory reporting and provide objective coverage of the situation.
6. All victims of the violence in Arakan state should receive treatment for trauma and extensive measures should be taken by both state and non-state actors to ensure restoration of lasting peace, security, livelihood and development.

ASEAN Free and Fair Elections

Elections are a pre-condition to democracy and as they promote social, political, and economic development, all ASEAN member states, particularly those that do not currently hold elections, must commit to periodic, free and fair elections. Only then can we fulfill the potential of ASEAN and ensure it empowers its citizens and remains people-centered.

We encourage all ASEAN member states, their Election Management Bodies (EMBs) and civil society members to endorse the Bangkok Declaration on Free and Fair Elections. Created by civil society members and EMBs from across Asia, the declaration addresses, in a practical way, many of the challenges concerning elections in the ASEAN region. By endorsing and then implementing the Bangkok Declaration‟s principles by 2015, ASEAN governments can prove their full democratic legitimacy to become of the people, by the people and for the people they serve.

To hold a free and fair election, countries must, in the context of their own country and its unique challenges, nevertheless meet some specific criteria:

1. Have a complete electoral/legal framework that ensures universal participation of citizens and functional independence for Election Management Bodies.
2. The framework should empower minorities, marginalized citizens and other people with special challenges while promoting the full participation of women in elections and facilitating voting for citizens living abroad.
3. Systems for Electoral Dispute Resolution must ensure that all complaints and electoral disputes are settled in a timely and impartial manner with adequate investigation and neutral resolution mechanisms.
4. Voter lists must be accurate so as to ensure the right to vote for all citizens. Voter registration must be simple, convenient, accessible, available and conducted in a timely manner that results in an accurate, complete voter list.
5. The electoral campaign should be peaceful, free and fair. Media should be impartial.
6. There should be proper oversight of parties‟ campaign finances and no misuse or abuse of government resources or interference by security services.
7. Fair voting operations must include professional polling station management.
8. Both citizens and election officials must have adequate training and education to perform their roles reliably and responsibly.
9. Citizen Election Observers should be fully recognized, accredited, and included in elections.
Citizen observers can promote the integrity and transparency of the entire election process.
We urge ASEAN and/or its member states to utilize and benefit from the rich electoral experience found across Asia. We recommend they turn the documents into action and work together to build and ensure free and fair elections across the region.

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[From the web] Human Rights Day 2012- Your voice, your right. Your #VoiceCounts -OHCHR

Human Rights Day 2012

Where we come from does not determine who we can become. What we look like places no limits on what we can achieve. We should all have the right to express ourselves, all have the right to be heard, all have the right to be what we can be: To reach for the sky and touch the stars. No matter who we are, no matter whether we are man or woman, or rich or poor:

My voice, my right. My voice counts.”

Desmond Tutu, a key figure in the defeat of apartheid in South Africa, Nobel Prize Laureate, first black Archbishop of South Africa.

Inclusion and the right to participate in public life

Everybody has the right to have their voice heard and to have a role in making the decisions that shape their communities. Each one of us should be able to choose those people who will represent us in all governance institutions, to stand for public office, and to vote on the fundamental questions that shape our individual and collective destines.

The return on that investment is a society tuned to the needs and aspirations of its constituents. Where this fundamental right is respected, each and every one of us is offered the opportunity to join in the debate, to offer ideas, to campaign for change – to participate.

Fulfillment of the right to participate in public life is fundamental to the functioning of a democratic society and an effective human rights protection system. Inclusion of ALL in decision-making processes is an essential precondition to the achievement of both.

Millions of people have gone onto the streets in the past few years to have their say, to protest the unyielding, unresponsive governments which have shut them out. They have demanded and continue demanding respect for their fundamental human rights, including their right to have a voice and for that voice to count.

Elsewhere, many remain silent, unable to take any part in the public lives of their communities. Often they cannot stand for office, vote for public officials or in referenda: at times they are prohibited from expressing their views at all.

Women, people with disabilities, individuals belonging to minorities and indigenous peoples, the poor, those with little or no education, remote rural communities, continue to be disenfranchised in many places, sometimes even prohibited from participation in public life or excluded on the basis of discriminatory laws or practices or because there is no appropriate infrastructure which would facilitate their inclusion.

The focus of this year’s Human Rights Day refers directly to the articles in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which provide for the right to freedom of assembly and association, the right to take part in elections, in public life and decision-making institutions and the right to freedom of expression and opinion.

These values, endorsed by the international community, are legally binding obligations upon the 167 States Parties to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which stipulates that the right to participate in the conduct of public affairs applies to “every citizen without exception”.

In the face of the extraordinary contemporary challenges for democracy, climate change, globalization, the on-going economic and financial crises in many countries, and the explosion of global web-based communication, among others, participation and inclusion are critical in the development and implementation of durable, workable policy solutions.

Your voice, your right. Your voice counts.

On Human Rights Day 2012, you are invited to reaffirm your right to voice your opinion and to take part in public discourse and decision-making processes without shame, threat or fear.

Source: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Day2012/Pages/HRD2012.aspx

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Press Release] ASEAN Human Rights Declaration Refuse to Protect LGBTIQ Rights!

ASEAN Human Rights Declaration Refuse to Protect LGBTIQ Rights!

This week November 18, 2012 at the ASEAN Summit in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) heads of state adopted the first ever ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (AHRD). To the grave disappointment of representatives of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ) peoples through out the region, the declaration did not include protections for this highly vulnerable group.

We, the ASEAN LGBTIQ Caucus[1] are outraged and disappointed by the decision of the ASEAN Head of States to adopt the AHRD that excluded sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI). Despite countless attempts and demands by the members of civil society, including LGBTIQ groups, to push for its inclusion, ASEAN have remained reticent to the attempts. This AHRD not only shows a lack of respect to LGBTIQ people but also makes a mockery of the international human rights values and principles that all nations and citizens abide by and are held accountable to.

“Evidently, the numerous failed attempts to engage with AICHR and the recent adoption of ASEAN Declaration with no mention of SOGI, sends a clear message that the human rights of LGBTIQ people are irrelevant to them,” explained Vien Tanjung, founder of Her Lounge.

All 10-member countries of ASEAN have ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), which have specific provisions of non-discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, and are therefore, obliged to protect and promote the rights of LGBTIQ people in the ASEAN region.

“Malaysia is a member country of the UN Human Rights Council and Malaysia was re-elected for the second term this year. It is shocking that ASEAN with such collective expertise and knowledge on human rights; discrimination is still persistent in this region. This is evidenced by the exclusion of SOGI in the AHRD,” said Thilaga, an LGBTIQ activist.

In order for the AHRD to be a relevant and credible human rights tool that protects and benefits the ASEAN community as a whole without discrimination as it aspires to be, the declaration has to be consistent with existing international human rights laws.

Jean Chong of Sayoni from Singapore also expressed her disappointment to the exclusion of SOGI in the AHRD. “No ASEAN citizen can aspire to her/his fullest potential as a citizen in their respective country with the tunnel vision and self serving approach of their governments.”

“We encourage everyone to publicly denounce support and legitimacy of the ASEAN Declaration. The priority of this declaration is not human rights, but economic and political interests of the ASEAN states at the expense of the ASEAN peoples,” explained Ging Cristobal, International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC)

BACKGROUND
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is a regional organization established in 1967 that comprises of countries in the South East Asia region. In 2009, the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) was formed to promote and protect the human rights of people in the region and was tasked to formulate the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (AHRD), which aimed to standardize all human rights of all people in the Southeast region of Asia.

All submissions are republished and redistributed in the same way that it was originally published online and sent to us. We may edit submission in a way that does not alter or change the original material.

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Event] Takbo ‘Te: Run for Equality

The Proud to be LGBT Campaign, the UPD College of Human Kinetics Student Council, and Take Back the Tech PH bring you

Takbo ‘Te: Run for Equality

In cooperation with UP Phi Delta Alpha Sorority, Bukluran Students’ Alliance, Queer Archers, and UPD SPECTRUM

Also brought to you by the League of Varsity Leaders in UP and the UPD University Student Council

| Registration fees: PHP 350 for 3k, PHP 400 for 5k and PHP 450 for 10k.

Limited stocks for singlets, so register now!
Singlet sizes (Chest circumference-Length from shoulder): XS (33-23), S (34-24), M (35-25), L (36-26), XL (37-27)

Satellite registration booths: Moonleaf Maginhawa, Moonleaf Katipunan, and the CHK Student Council Office (UP CHK Gym)

Note: Once you have registered, you will be asked for your preferred mode of payment through text. Payments can be made through bank deposits, satellite registration booths, or the on-site registration booth. Complete race kits may be claimed starting November 12.

Event page: http://tinyurl.com/takbote
Online registration form: http://tinyurl.com/ptbltakbote
Proud to be LGBT page: https://www.facebook.com/ProudToBeLGBT

See you there!

Get ready to RUN FOR YOUR RIGHTS! 🙂

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

[Petition] Demand Inclusion of LGBT Rights in the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration!! -ASEAN LGBT

Demand Inclusion of LGBT Rights in the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration!!

Target: ASEAN Heads of States
Sponsored by: ASEAN LGBT Caucus and the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC)

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is a regional organization established in 1967 comprised of countries in the South East Asia region. In 2009, the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) was formed to promote and protect the human rights of people in the region and was tasked to formulate the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (AHRD), which aimed to standardize all human rights of all people in the Southeast region of Asia.

As it is, LGBTIQ persons in this region are subjected to systematic discrimination and violence endorsed by the state. We are concerned that the lack of protection and recognition of LGBTIQ persons in the AHRD will further exacerbate (or deteriorate) the rights of LGBTIQ people in their respective countries.

Read full article and sign petition @ www.thepetitionsite.com

Human Rights Online Philippines does not hold copyright over these materials. Author/s and original source/s of information are retained including the URL contained within the tagline and byline of the articles, news information, photos etc.

« Older Entries